PDA

View Full Version : A Couple of Marantz Receivers


SoCal Sam
09-22-2008, 11:12 AM
Here are my Marantz 2500 and 2285B receivers. One sounds better than the other...

legal eagle
09-22-2008, 11:58 AM
Ehhhh,
That big one takes way too much space at your place, and I can't just sit here and watch a fellow AKer agonize over that lost space.

:sigh:

You know the rest :smoke:

I'll charge you actual shipping. :scratch2:

Yggdrasill
09-22-2008, 12:34 PM
Here are my Marantz 2500 and 2285B receivers. One sounds better than the other...

So which one IS it!? :scratch2:

Seriously, how would you describe the sound differences between the two?

I have a 2270 and 2238b; I like them both but they're remarkably different sounding. The 2270 has more presence and warmth, the 2238b has finer detail and a more sensitive tuner.

Cheers,

Thor

Sage
09-22-2008, 03:04 PM
WOW! I never realized the size difference before until seeing them side by side. The 2285B is itself a stout little package to pick up and carry around. That 2500 must be a back breaker!

My own 2285B sounds better than almost everything else in my collection. So my guess is the mighty-mite 2285B.

jeff105
09-22-2008, 03:23 PM
I own the 2285b......... 2 of them actually.
In my opinion, one of the better sounding Marantz receivers of all time.

SoCal Sam
09-22-2008, 04:01 PM
Ehhhh,
That big one takes way too much space at your place, and I can't just sit here and watch a fellow AKer agonize over that lost space.

:sigh:

You know the rest :smoke:

I'll charge you actual shipping. :scratch2:

Deal!:D But first, I need your help with some bank deposits I have in Nigeria...

SoCal Sam
09-22-2008, 04:03 PM
So which one IS it!? :scratch2:

Seriously, how would you describe the sound differences between the two?

I have a 2270 and 2238b; I like them both but they're remarkably different sounding. The 2270 has more presence and warmth, the 2238b has finer detail and a more sensitive tuner.

Cheers,

Thor

Both have the signature smoothness. The 2500 is supremely powerful and the difference is noticeable, kind of like a V8 and a 4 cylinder. The 2285B is finely resolved and nuanced in such a way the 2500 is not. It seems to be much faster and quieter than the 2500. The 2500 is still a great receiver but side by side, my preference is clear. The 2285B is more engaging and ultimately, more satisfying.

SoCal Sam
09-22-2008, 04:04 PM
WOW! I never realized the size difference before until seeing them side by side. The 2285B is itself a stout little package to pick up and carry around. That 2500 must be a back breaker!

My own 2285B sounds better than almost everything else in my collection. So my guess is the mighty-mite 2285B.

You know, I didn't realize how much bigger and heavier the 2500 is. Size doesn't always matter...

SoCal Sam
09-22-2008, 04:05 PM
I own the 2285b......... 2 of them actually.
In my opinion, one of the better sounding Marantz receivers of all time.

Great idea! I'll get a backup 2285B one of these days.