BattleBrat
Active Member
FLAC, using DB poweramp, it would be converting not encoding but eh."Encode" CDs? Do tell.
FLAC, using DB poweramp, it would be converting not encoding but eh."Encode" CDs? Do tell.
Please stay on topic, don't know, nor do I care, CD's are on the way out too.That's a transcode, isn't it?
1971 Ford Mustang with a 428 SOHC
So is Vinyl - they lower the bass output, compress the dynamic range and, decrease stereo separation. NOT ALL CD's are done that way, not even most.
Sure it is. ANY new VINYL is mastered Brickwall if it is from a digital master and that is cheaper to do. It is how it is done now. And most remastered vinyl is also brickwalled if they use a digital system. That is how it works.
You need to not lecture people and lose your attitude buddy....You really need to read more and not assume things.
Ummmm the SOHC "Cammer" was a 427 and was never used in Mustangs.......71 Mustangs used the 429 in CJ or SCJ config. 428s were used in 69-70s
Once it is brickwalled it can't be undone. Sorry. Most brickwalling is done during recording.
Well, you are just expanding a compressed copy - tells you absolutely nothing.
Try this CD - The Pizarelli Boys - Sundays at Pete. A most amazing new CD.
I am not presuming that Ford did not make a SOHC 428 as they did not, the Cammer was a 427......and it was one of the most rare and expensive race engines of the time.Wasn’t referring to a stock vehicle....just like how most vintage turntables on this site are not stock !!!! My turntable is not even stock as it was out of the box..... I put a 428 OHSC into a ‘71 Mercury Cyclone Eliminator and had pieced cars together for decades. Interchangeablity my boy.....interchangeablity !!!
Your presuming again......
Wasn’t referring to a stock vehicle....just like how most vintage turntables on this site are not stock !!!! My turntable is not even stock as it was out of the box..... I put a 428 OHSC into a ‘71 Mercury Cyclone Eliminator and had pieced cars together for decades. Interchangeablity my boy.....interchangeablity !!!
Your presuming again......
I am not presuming that Ford did not make a SOHC 428 as they did not, the Cammer was a 427......and it was one of the most rare and expensive race engines of the time.
my old man had a SCJ in one, but it wasnt stock. huge highrise, braces everywhere, 2 4bbls, 8000rpm limit. 4mpg. rusty as fords of old were in the pitt area. if you are an old timer, you saw it at quail or read about it...it got to the point he worried about flooring it and leaving a significant portion of the car behind....Wasn’t referring to a stock vehicle....just like how most vintage turntables on this site are not stock !!!! My turntable is not even stock as it was out of the box..... I put a 428 OHSC into a ‘71 Mercury Cyclone Eliminator and had pieced cars together for decades. Interchangeablity my boy.....interchangeablity !!!
Your presuming again......