ateal
Super Member
Why must it be so damn hard? And mjw21a only scratches the surface (an apt but unfortunate metaphor when discussing LPs). I know it's part of the appeal to many, and the famous cartoon says it well "What draws me to vinyl is the expense and the difficulty" (a poor paraphrase from memory). But the mere thought of what's required to wring the best from my MC201 — and only then know if I like it — makes me think lovingly of CDs.
I only have 7 tonearms currently, ranging from ultra-light to fairly heavy; only 4 SS phono preamps and 3 tube; and a meager 3 MC step-ups, one the AI SUT discussed here, superb but, according to Ateal, lousy for the 201; one the MC stage in a fine Tandberg full-function preamp; the third an EMT/Thorens active head-amp — yet the possible combinations, not to mention loading possibilities, amount to - - I'll leave that to a mathematician. And the time it will take to try them all, I'll leave to a mortician.
I remember when a Garrard changer with a nobody-knew-what cartridge sounded sublime, and Mom blissing out on her plug-n-play KLH 20, playing everything from Shostakovich to Purple Haze. "Progress" has made almost everything easier, and the progress in vinyl playback has been astonishing. But what happened to the easy part?
I see young newbie hipsters at GW buying stacks of Al Martino records so badly scratched they'd rip my Gyger out of its tiny laser-drilled socket, and they don't know scratches matter, and I'm sure they love them totally, "so much warmer pop-tic-scrunch than my MP3"... and I envy them.
Sorry for the length of this pointless cri de coeur.
I hope you didn’t think from my posts that I was denigrating the MC 201 or the 40 Ohm version of the AI SUT as that wasn’t my intention.
I think it was clear that I have not experienced the MC 201 through the AI SUT so I cannot even comment on that combo, let alone state it is lousy. I can only report a disappointment I had in the MC 201 when using an Audio Technica SUT some years ago and also a disappointment i had in using the FR1 with a 40 Ohm tap on an SUT.
I think mjw21a has something with the whole tonearm mass thing. I am using the MC 202 with a tonearm which has an effective mass of 21g, including headshell but excluding cartridge weight.
I think what we need is for mjw21a to give the FR1 and MC 201 a test drive through the 3 Ohm tap of his FRT4 and report his findings.