8080/9090 Turner is good, slightly better than 7070, as would be expected for upevel models. I've found the 5000/A/X to be surprisingly good when aligned correctly, considering the vintage. Will concur with Kev on the G9000, have not had the privilege of auditioning a 22/33000 so can't speak to it personally. G-9700 seems to be a really good one too, based on my limited exposure to one a few years back, when I owned one briefly.
Interestingly, the QRX-8001/9001 have tuners that are average despite being top of the range receivers. I think they omitted a high performance tuner on those models (not that it is bad, but not quite what one would expect) due to cost constraints mostly.
Needless to say, the top end tuner performance usually was found in the separates, starting with the TU-9900, then the TU-919 and pretty well peaking with the TU-X1. I don't know where you are located, but I have to say the St. Louis, MO radio market is terrible these days.
We have one jazz/blues station run by a nearby university with marginal reception for most of STL proper, and a low power FM translator for an HD radio classical station that is well programmed, if you can actually pull it in. An outside antenna is almost required to do either of these justice. We have KSHE-95 FM which is a legendary long time classic/album oriented rock station (50 years and running) that is sometimes listenable, but often intolerable due to heavy repetition and too much new rock in the playlist.
Outside of that, both the AM and FM bands here are generally a wasteland of conglomerate corporate radio with voice tracking shallow, predictable playlists and 20+ minutes of commercials an hour. I point this out only to convey why I no longer much concern myself with tuners, even though I own some very nice ones. A damn shame what has become of terrestrial radio here, really. Hopefully you have something better In your locale to make a nice tuner worthwhile.