67dylan
Active Member
The OP's complaint was rogue speed (100 rpm?).
That happened to me once with one of the cheapo Pio's (PL-300) someone left for me to "see what I can do" and never bothered to phone about it since. The feather weight platter was going so fast I was worried it'll go air borne and chop my neck. It only had 9 lytics on it, all cheap Nippon Chemi's and Rubycons from the 70's. I tested only the PS cap for ESR and it was way off any of my older charts. I didn't bother with testing the rest, most were low voltage low capacitance EC's so it was a five bucks worth of a complete recap. But that wasn't the end of it. I gave that abandoned TT to a forum member who was sold on the quartz lock drive and expressed interest in fixing it, as it was. He just replaced the two trimmers that probably developed dead spots, and that, plus the earlier recap, did the trick.
The PL4 and PL300 are different beasts. IMO very different. Parts, IC's, and operations aren't even close. Comparing the repair of one doesn't mean that fix will repair the other.
A dead spot on a pot will still allow more/less speed than an estimated 100rpm depending on the rotation of the pot. The dead spot would have no rpm. That is not in his description of problems he's encountered. He can always check the output of the pots if he has the know how and a MM. Now consider the IC's. There is a reference v on one and Hall element on the other. A bad cap on either of those will do what?
Now granted I'm taking a guess based on no real technical data from the original t-shooting. We're all giving info and he should start out with the simple stuff...like deoxing ALL switches/pots & checking voltage input/output. Then go from there. Otherwise, we're all blindly shooting darts