Heard several 200-500K systems over the years and only one person had it right: Albert Porter and his system sounded perfect to me. He's also the only person that I've met that had a perfect system and he's a true music lover with a very nice LP library,master tapes, and Tape Project tapes. Most of those people that had grandiose systems usually had a very limited music libraries yet they want to give advise to everyone else as to what to buy and what sounds right and what doesn't. They also tend to change components as often as they change clothes- too much money and too much time on their hands.I've always been a fan of smaller yet well made setups.
-Greg
I recently listened to systems that I would estimate cost at least $50k and was less than impressed. One setup was a Mark Levinson/Aerial Acoustics combo sourced with a VPI Classic TT. The second was a McIntosh setup with a Sooloos music server (what a rip off) running a pair of new B&W 802 D3s. My big take away was that after years of listening to vintage audio equipment and old jazz recordings, my listening preferences lean HEAVILY to the warm side. I appreciate resolution but YIKES. Both systems were physically impressive and had their sonics merits, but I could never live with a system that didn't allow me to enjoy music regardless of recording quality.
We're all heavily biased. Our systems are a reflection of our preferences. I'll be the first to tell you that it can be hard to listen to an audio system you've never heard before without prejudice. Money and performance are not nearly as directly related as one may think. So there you are in a showroom listening to a system that costs more than your home - do you really think you can just enjoy it for its presentation versus thinking, "it should blow my mind as it costs more than my home"?
I've visited hundreds of audio dealers when I was a sales manager in the audio industry. I've heard some spectacular systems and some not so spectacular ones. Cost was never a guarantee of performance. The systems that impressed me the most were the ones at which the operator knew how to utilize the media to showcase its strengths based on my taste in music. Just because some audiophile recording is perfect in every way does not mean that I'll like the music. I've actually been told, "I could never play that on this system" when asked what I may like to hear. How silly - as if the song I wanted to hear would cause the components to become damaged in some way.
My last trip to a super high end dealer was mixed as all of the music I listened to on the various systems was FLAC from an in store server. Finally I asked the salesperson if he had a turntable in any of their demo rooms. He sat me down in front of an all Linn system with an LP12 as the source and played something I was familiar with. That was the system that sounded to my ears better than all the others. Funny how that works ...
No it isn't. I have heard a surround system with 5 German Physics speaker 3 subs and all the equipment to support it - the speakers were 1 million dollars alone. Did it sound any better? It just sounded different. Would I want it - NO - I actually preferred my modest surround instead - just me though.
I have also heard a system consisting of:
Wilson Alexadria XLF's
2- Wilson Thor's Hammer subs
Dan D'Agostino pre and monoblocs
2 Parasound JC1's (for the subs)
dcs Vivaldi Playback Stack
Brinkman Spyder TT with 2 arms (One stereo - one mono)
D'Agostino phono Pre
All TOTL Transparent cables
If that isn't a serious system - I don't know what is. Unless YOU are defining 'Serious' is and the problem there is each of us have a different definition of what 'Serious' is.
Not everyone wants State Of The Art sound. So let's get rid of those who don't first. If you are happy with what you have, no matter what you have: GOD bless you. Happiness comes from within. Not from a sound system. A trillionaire may not be happy with the world at his feet and all possible advantage coming exactly when and how he needs it. Whilst a begging mendicant monk may be the possessor of the highest bliss possible despite all possible difficulty and all possible opposition being faced. Happiness does not respect outward circumstance. So let's divorce the following from all those who might say "I'm happy with my ________ ". There does exist strata of sound quality and truly obscenely great sound quality matters to some people
because it is a priority to them. They value the qualities that incredible reproduction of recorded sound brings to them and are prepared to
learn what it is, how to attain it and what factors mitigate against it. One of the thing they learn is:
High price is no guarantee of great sound. Getting off your listening chair and listening in person to some high priced systems is a very educational lesson.
What money cannot buy is the ability to optimise what has not been optimised, the ability to determine what needs to be optimised and the insight into the competing offerings on the market to seek out what might be able to optimise the sound. What is between a set of ears determines whether a system succeeds or fails. Not the fullness of the wallet. Having said that, aside from the second hand market, diy, and miracle purchases - State Of The Art sound for a complete system will rarely be available for a week's salary at the minimum wage. First if one wants either SOTA sound or somethings approaching it, one needs to have heard it or something approaching it. Experience. That intangible stuff between the ears that money can buy, but in the absence of unlimited cash reserves, can also be obtained by persistent searching. Second, in the absence of unlimited cash reserves to allow one to buy and sell everything to get that first hand knowledge, the understanding of the concepts which underpin great sounding equipment and underpin the assembling of great sounding systems.
Lack of understanding the concepts which underpin great sounding equipment often leads to leaping upon misguided trends which can sweep the media and the public. There are a mountain of concepts which need to be understood which underpin great sound. Many do not wish to take the time to investigate them. Lack of understanding the concepts leaves one vulnerable to falling victim to opinion, fashion, marketing or lies. Opinion, fashion and marketing needn't be misleading. They may be in particular times and circumstances, correct. There are however plenty of lies. Along with misguided opinion, fashion and marketing. This is why conceptual understanding of what underpins great sound can enable one to navigate through the maze of opinion, fashion, marketing and lies. In order to discern which are valuable and which are dead ends. An open-mind is required. Time spent investigating and researching is also required. One may be seeking the 'voice in the wilderness'. Most truly great sounding equipment sounded great because the manufacturer grasped something that other manufacturers had either overlooked or didn't consider sufficiently. Mavericks can be a blessing in Audio. Persistent sifting of concepts will be necessary.
Lack of understanding the concepts which underpin the assembling of great sounding systems leads to a revolving door of adequate but not great resulting systems. Here the danger becomes one of having acquired magnificent components which do not work well together or which are being utilised in such a manner as to fail to attain the greatness that they are truly able to ascend to when utilised by one with the requisite understanding. A trap which many dealers and purchasers fall into. They have either Golden components which fail to make Golden systems or they have Golden systems and fail to have The Golden Touch to bring the best out of the Golden system.
The most valuable thing that a seeker after spectacular sound quality can possess, after unlimited cash reserves, is experience. Too many lack both. Most who had unlimited cash reserves would never be called upon to expend them in the search, if they had a similar fund of the necessary experience.