No not walsh...Ohm Walsh speakers, I'm broke lol
Funny this thread just came up, as it's (sort of) what I am trying to do with my next system. From conversing with other AK members, and a little research of my own, this is what I have come up with:
For media, I have to cheat a little and use what I already have, which comes to under $500;
Technics QD33 with Ortofon 320P
Generic tablet with PowerAmp and a 1TB HDD connected via FX Audio DAC X6
Now on to the FUN stuff!
Tekton Double Impacts $3000
DartZeel NHB108 "copy" $700
Kondo M77 "study" $600 (Hope it's not considered cheating to build a kit)
I'm hoping to get away with 12AX7's in the M77 clone. I can get an octet of Gold Lion reissues for $265
Total comes to $4665. That leaves $300 for the Tekton cap upgrade for the DI's.
While it might not best a $50k system, I bet it would qualify for the "Damn, that sounds pretty good!" category.
I haven't seen those same comments. Are they really saying that $5000 will buy all the performance available in today's market, or are they thinking that $5000 will buy enough performance that anyone should be willing to be satisfied with it?Hi all. I am guilty of watching youtube videos about audio.
I have seen several comments saying things as to the effect of, speeding anything over $5000 is a waste of money. One thing I do not see is anyone explaining how they have assembled a complete system with in that budget that competes with the mega dollar systems.
Rega Planar 6 with Exact 2 cartridge ($1995)This is purely for discussion.
Let's say the room is 14x18 feet with 8 foot ceiling,sheetrock,carpet flooring with normal furniture. Room treatments consist of 2 bass traps.
To make this easier budget does not have to cover tax or shipping. Budget doesn't have to cover basic cables of the non exotic nature. Pricing does have to reflect current prices though,So no Krells found at goodwill!
I hope this makes for a fun topic
It's espoused a LOT over on the Reddit audiophile forums. They are pretty much of the opinion that all amps sound the same and the flatter the speaker the better. And that all that can be achieved with DSP so anything over $5k for a DAC, amp, and speakers, is a waste of money. Of course, a few people pop up who have actually SPENT more than that, and they insist it's$10k where you really are just splitting hairs above.I haven't seen those same comments. Are they really saying that $5000 will buy all the performance available in today's market, or are they thinking that $5000 will buy enough performance that anyone should be willing to be satisfied with it?
Rega Planar 6 with Exact 2 cartridge ($1995)
Rega Brio integrated amp ($995)
Dynaudio Emit M10 speakers ($799)
Dynaudio Stand 10 ($399)
Differing opinions are what make a hobby forum fun. My own bias is continuing to agree with what Martin Colloms once wrote for Stereophile, "From my experience of more than 250 digital products, coherent, expressive, naturally explosive dynamics and the ability to present good musical pace and a confident, upbeat rhythm are areas in which digital is surprisingly weak." A digital source or introducing digital processing can only lessen the quality of sound I expect. Of course, people can make of my opinion what they will. . .It's espoused a LOT over on the Reddit audiophile forums. They are pretty much of the opinion that all amps sound the same and the flatter the speaker the better. And that all that can be achieved with DSP so anything over $5k for a DAC, amp, and speakers, is a waste of money. Of course, a few people pop up who have actually SPENT more than that, and they insist it's$10k where you really are just splitting hairs above.
It's mostly a case of; "About double what I have now is the limit of what anyone should spend".
But then, they also crap on the idea of anybody using vinyl because "it's against the principals of audiophilia, as it's choosing a lesser format based purely on nostalgia".
So make of their opinions what you will.
I won't comment on the rest, but on that one... They're right.... they also crap on the idea of anybody using vinyl because "it's against the principals of audiophilia, as it's choosing a lesser format based purely on nostalgia".
I like vinyl because it is almost another hobby. Cleaning and handling records, setting things up, etc.I won't comment on the rest, but on that one... They're right.
That is the gist of it. Please keep in mine this is not my personal quote. I don't know if it could be done.I have heard a few systems at and above 50,000. My system already past the $5000 point is not in the running.I haven't seen those same comments. Are they really saying that $5000 will buy all the performance available in today's market, or are they thinking that $5000 will buy enough performance that anyone should be willing to be satisfied with it?
I understand, and fully appreciate the joy vinyl users get from the whole experience. But I think vinylophiles should be distinguished from audiophiles. It's possible to be both, of course, but it's hard to argue that one can be both for the same reason: best possible sound.I like vinyl because it is almost another hobby. Cleaning and handling records, setting things up, etc.
Weeeeeel, not to start the same sort of debate that happens over there with annoying regularity, but there are a number of releases where, despite it's archaic and limited technical prowess, vinyl tends to get a better mastering due to the fact that sound engineers KNOW that people who buy vinyl are prone to sit with intent, and sometime worrying, expressions on their faces as they fiercely listen for ANY deficiency, due to the nature of how much they spent and how much time they put into their vinyl setup. This can give the person in charge of the mastering process pause when it comes to hitting the compression button on the computer and heading home to bed.I understand, and fully appreciate the joy vinyl users get from the whole experience. But I think vinylophiles should be distinguished from audiophiles. It's possible to be both, of course, but it's hard to argue that one can be both for the same reason: best possible sound.
removed this part to avoid a flame war...I understand, and fully appreciate the joy vinyl users get from the whole experience. But I think vinylophiles should be distinguished from audiophiles. It's possible to be both, of course, but it's hard to argue that one can be both for the same reason: best possible sound.
Weeeeeel, not to start the same sort of debate