SoCal Sam
Lunatic Member
...I don't know if things have changed on the Cutting Edge, but that view used to be seen as heresy on that forum. What got me kicked out was insisting that people could perceive the sound to be better simply because they like the look of the equipment better, even if objectively the sound is the same. To me this seemed obvious, but simply expressing that view was seen as insulting and unacceptable in the Cutting Edge. Again, that might have changed, but I know this was the situation a few years ago.
WTF? This is why I never visit The Cutting Edge. IME flipping gear and talking to buyers, I have come to accept psycho-acoustics as a real phenomenon. Psycho-acoustics triggers buys especially when the science behind the product is shaky or non-existent. The idea that something looks better suited for the task or simply looks more aesthetically pleasing leads to expectation bias and the perception of better sound. The most shocking and discrediting aspect of all this is that the cable cabal consistently denies science and now psycho-acoustics! (Mention Roger Russell in any cable thread and those who howl are guaranteed to be industry advocates.) Don't get me wrong, cables look cool and if of the right gage and size, serve a function.