If you stay away from the super desirable models that people will go into a bidding war over, there are still good turntables like that one on Ebay that can be had for a reasonable price. The only down side is that you are at the mercy of the person packing it for shipping. That can turn out to be a disaster. I went through that once already.Go on eBay, try and get something like this nice little Sony, an inexpensive phono pre and you're all set.
View attachment 1166079
And that's why there are so many of them cluttering up the thrift stores, CL, and the landfills. People that don't know any better see them cheap, buy them, figure out how bad they suck (or they just quit working in short order), and then they dump them. Some items just aren't worth buying no matter how low the price tag is. I've learned that the hard way with certain things.
I suspect a lot of non-audiophiles hear people talking about "how great vinyl sounds." They go out and buy a cheap Crosley all in one, get it home, and wonder what all the hype about vinyl sound is about and risk damaging their records.However, that upper end Crosley does seem to be in a category outside the normal Crosley line.Yuuup. Little secret....I knew better but I bought one early this year as well. I think it was the catalyst for my re-entry into the HiFi hobby. I bought a nostalgia wood set (at a bargain price) from Marshalls...I think it was on clearance. I already had my old system in the house from years ago, yet I wanted a little thing for the bedroom corner. Well long story short, the Crosley was so cheap it went beyond my tolerance for equipment quality. I can tolerate the old BSRs because of their rock solid dependability, but I won't tolerate cheapness and disfunction. The Crosley wouldn't play on one channel, and when I'd wiggle the stylus it would play for a little while, then fade out again. It had a CD recorder (which was what attracted me) and a playback cassette deck, but the sound quality was lower than some alarm clocks that I owned, and if you sat by the unit closely enough then perhaps you could hear it play. I returned that thing a few days after, and thus my journey back into HiFi began!
So tell us how good your first record player was, and where did it end up?And that's why there are so many of them cluttering up the thrift stores, CL, and the landfills. People that don't know any better see them cheap, buy them, figure out how bad they suck (or they just quit working in short order), and then they dump them.
I suspect a lot of non-audiophiles hear people talking about "how great vinyl sounds." They go out and buy a cheap Crosley all in one, get it home, and wonder what all the hype about vinyl sound is about and risk damaging their records.However, that upper end Crosley does seem to be in a category outside the normal Crosley line.
I own 3 vintage tables and that is my go to for vinyl. IMHO, If you want a table that doesn't require some "fiddling," avoid vintage. Unless fully restored, they will likely need a little attention, at which point you won't get them super cheap. I got lucky on a couple Kenwoods, but even they needed pots cleaned, etc. The work was all doable with help from the internet, but if you are hesitant to 'crack' the case, vintage probably isn't for you.
Although I don't own one, I have been following the UTurn Orbit's development, and customer comments, etc. For the average person entering vinyl, I recommend the Orbit if you want an inexpensive, solid performer with great customer support.
My first was likely a Fisher Price or something with a BSR changer. I don't remember (or care) at this point.So tell us how good your first record player was, and where did it end up?
You seem surprised that people outgrow an affordable, basic first record player. But isn't that the whole point of them? If it wasn't for the Crosleys and other cheap record players, the entry into the vinyl hobby would be much more expensive and more difficult, and a lot fewer people would bother with it.
To put things in perspective, 89% of all new turntables sold cost less than $250. The average selling price is under $80, and the top-selling brands are Victrola, Audio-Technica (thanks to the LP60), Crosley, Jensen, and Sony (thanks to their LP60-based PS-LX300USB).
Very much agreed with malden here (he may be shocked to hear this!) although I'd say it doesn't ncessarily have to be fully manual and it's worth splurging for the $49 ART DJ Pre II preamp if you can.The best "bang for your buck" is going to be a 1970's or 1980's fully manual Japanese turntable. They were well built and reliable. Don't get hung up on any particular brand. Regarding craigslist, you have to be somewhat patient, you can also check ebay for listings in your area.
Pfantone, Realistic, Olson, etc. "phono pre-amps" are available on ebay for $15.00 to $25.00. If you're patient and smart, you'll be able to do this for your $150.00 budget...
That's selective memory -- just like people who say that music from [insert decade here] was better than today's music. They're forgetting all the garbage that was forgotten forever as soon as it dropped off the Top 40 chart. (Disco Duck, anyone?)I'm not surprised that people outgrow their first record player. It's the fact that a lot of the offerings today are such piss poor quality garbage that aren't hardly worth owning at any price.
I'm fully aware that low end products have always been around, and have seen those acoustic kiddie record grinders. I'd gladly take a Wildcat or Swingmate over a POS Crosley Cruiser or Jensen any day, though. I know neither is good for record life or sound, but I sure know which is built better. I do honestly believe that older music was better overall, too.That's selective memory -- just like people who say that music from [insert decade here] was better than today's music. They're forgetting all the garbage that was forgotten forever as soon as it dropped off the Top 40 chart. (Disco Duck, anyone?)
A GE Wildcat or Emerson Swingmate from the '60s or '70s may have been heavier and contained more metal parts than a Crosley Cruiser or Jensen JTA-230 or today, but that doesn't necessarily mean they sounded any better or were any gentler to the grooves.
In fact, if you want to talk about a record player that literally did ruin records in just one play, the kiddie toy acoustic phonographs from the likes of Vanity Fair hung around a lot longer than they had any right to:
No offense, but I've been playing with records, record players, and other electronics since I was old enough to walk, basically. You're not likely to tell me much I don't already know. I'm not some newbie looking for advice on Youtube.
Feel free to use the ignore button if you don't like what I have to say.
I though saying I had a selective memory was fairly personal, but whatever.I thought we were having a respectful discussion. No need to get personal and escalate things so quickly.