marantzfan
...
Why oh why isn't this a sticky?:sigh:
Why oh why isn't this a sticky?:sigh:
Really, how many AK member owners can there be out there?
I take comfort that it pops up pretty high on google.
Does the lower mid cone transmission line vent out the back? Is the other black circle the woofer port? I've never seen the back of a QLS1 before. They look awesome. I just did my first refoam ever too my poly Watkins and they came out just fine. I also used Rick Cobb's kit.
I just wanted to be sure the the woofer did use the entire cabinet.
That's a very large amount of cubic feet for that woofer in the QLS1 compared to the Q2, 1.5, 2.5 and 4.5. What is the optimal amount of cubic feet for the Watkins woofer? In other words, which of the Infinity models cubic feet measurements should I use for best sound using the Watkins woofer?
Since I am building these cabinets I can modify the design and still end up with a cabinet that looks like a QLS1 or Q2 but maximizes the performance and sound of the woofer.
Please explain?If you don't use a turntable you won't need to use the low frequency cutoff circuit.
I read that link on Line Source speakers and it helped explain it in an easy to understand explaination. But I wonder just where the rear drivers of the QLS line up might interfer with the concept of the line source design. Since in the explaination of the line source advantages it tells the story of confusing the ear by reflecting sounds from walls and floors. Since the QLS uses rear firing drivers for the EMIT and mid bass it kind of screws up the concept of a true line source. Mcintosh made some pretty nice line sources which do not use di-pole designs, I wonder if they sound better.
bump to keep it easy to find!
Why not just and it to your favorites? That's how I find it easily. :yes: