Looks like an M97xE to me. Facing the front of the cartridge, if you look at the body low and to the right, you should see it labeled "M97 x".Not sure but it looks exactly like this one.
In that case, it would be helpful to know the input capacitance of the internal phono pre in the AU-7900. Maybe another member would know. If it’s on the high side (>250 pf) the M91 would be a better choice. If it’s closer to 100 pf, either would work because it’s easy to add capacitance with cables. Removing internal capacitance is more difficult.I don't have a phono pre, I'm running it through the phono of my Sansui AU-7900 amp.
"M97 x" is on the spot where you mentioned, so it's definitely an M97xE. I don't like bright sound either find it fatiguing. Thanks for your detailed response.Looks like an M97xE to me. Facing the front of the cartridge, if you look at the body low and to the right, you should see it labeled "M97 x".
Shure designed the V15VxMR and M97xE with what they called a "softened" high end, this in response to audio critics who found the earlier V15V-MR a bit harsh in the high end. The M97xE's response curve at TNT Audio certainly shows a nice downward slope of 2 or 3 dB between 2 kHz and 6 kHz, leveling off after that. In any event, I consider the M97xE to be absolutely perfect for my current system, and it pains me that Shure is no longer in the business. I can't trust that aftermarket styli are going to sound anything like the original; the few reviews I've read all remark that the aftermarket replacements sound brighter than the original, and avoidance of bright sound is one of the things that make the M97xE so special to me (I also credit the aluminum mounting block, that seems to mate so well, so rigidly to the headshell as I bear down on the stainless steel mounting hardware, for providing me with much better resolution and dynamics than I got with the older Shure VST III).
Whether you keep the M91ED or the M97xE, you're going to have to rely on companies other than Shure for your replacement stylus needs, and there's no predicting what options will be available in the years ahead. If it were me, and since you have both cartridges at hand, I think I'd just try both in the ELAC and keep the one you like best.
I know this isn't exactly what you mean but I have phono pickup load settings on the back. This is a picture I got off the web.In that case, it would be helpful to know the input capacitance of the internal phono pre in the AU-7900. Maybe another member would know. If it’s on the high side (>250 pf) the M91 would be a better choice. If it’s closer to 100 pf, either would work because it’s easy to add capacitance with cables. Removing internal capacitance is more difficult.
,Went to my local store and picked up a generic Pfansteihl stylus DE-4761. Just wanted something so I could play my vinyl and it sounds OK.
View attachment 1349429 View attachment 1349430
I know this isn't exactly what you mean but I have phono pickup load settings on the back. This is a picture I got off the web. View attachment 1349604
I live in Halifax, NS on the east coast of Canada. I must admit I was surprised they had it too, thought I'd have to order it off Amazon. Taz Records is the biggest record store here, they have a lot of products for the vintage audio enthusiast.While I am not a fan of generic styli, I am very curious to know where the heck you live that a local store stocks them. I live in Brooklyn, where one can get anything. No one has this stuff.
,
Thanks I'll keep it on the lower setting, not a fan of brightness.That is different. It’s resistance, rather than capacitance. However, you could add a little brightness by going to 100k or decrease brightness by reducing to the 30k setting. This would give either cart a little more flexibility. 47k (50) is the manufacturer’s recommendation.
...Shure designed the V15VxMR and M97xE with what they called a "softened" high end, this in response to audio critics who found the earlier V15V-MR a bit harsh in the high end.
While I like them both I would pick the M91ED. It was my "go to" cartridge for years and I still have a fondness for it. The M97xe is a V15III wanna be and I'll take the V15III every time.
It’s nothing like a V15-III. Modeled more like the V15-VxMR. Has the damping brush. Of course it falls short on performance relative to the VxMR due to the stylus.
My experience with the M97xE was been underwhelming. I think I had a bad stylus, it wore fast and I never liked the high freq roll off very much.
I put a LPGear Vivid Line on it and it’s now very enjoyable.
The M91 is a vintage crowd favorite. I have an M75 that I like too.
I just checked Google, your right on the money it's 866 miles. It is quite nice here, Halifax is a major seaport and the city is very scenic and not much snow yet, get most of it staring in January. Very small city compared to New York about 450,000 people.You must be at least 700 or 800 miles north of NYC. When did it start snowing? September maybe? Regardless of your latitude, that place looks like Shangri- La compared to NYC.
Thanks I love the base as well and think the TT looks and sounds amazing. I am keeping the M91ED.The 97 is very blah! Keep the M91ED. Sold many Miracords with that cart. It will out perform the 97! That is a cool looking base. Never seen that one. Great table.
Eric
It’s nothing like a V15-III. Modeled more like the V15-VxMR. Has the damping brush. Of course it falls short on performance relative to the VxMR due to the stylus.
My experience with the M97xE was been underwhelming. I think I had a bad stylus, it wore fast and I never liked the high freq roll off very much.
I put a LPGear Vivid Line on it and it’s now very enjoyable.
The M91 is a vintage crowd favorite. I have an M75 that I like too.