Me personally ... no. But just to clarify your speaking of the 629-DE that started this thread?
I don't know if it helps or hinders, but there's a thread somewhere on here (or perhaps vinylengine) with a reported email conversation with a rep at Jico regarding their Shure m91ed vs. m91e styli, where the rep stated they even though they are spec'd for different tracking forces, they are exactly the same, other than colour and of course price ($56 vs $33).
I would expect as well that a $12 generic stylus would have a far larger variation in compliance, related to QC during the manufacturing process, that you would have seen with the originals. I'm not sure I'd trust results of one random test ... or even a couple (just remember the often-heard comment on the Pfanstiehls ... and less frequently on the EVGs ... regarding mixed results).
Of course buying a NOS styli should get you something that is actually matches specified compliance .... except of course you would be dealing with aging of the suspension. So ...
Makes sense. Yes I was referring to the stylus discussed in this thread. I have a few of them myself but no test record. I've got a couple of different tables with different effective mass arms so I'm curious how the compliance match is on each.