• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

My new antenna project... (yet another ant thread)

Update

Hi Asha..
Thanks for the well wishes! It really means a lot.

I'm affraid it is going to be a while.
Hopefully not to long.
Apologies for getting everyone excited then not being
able to deliver.

Hi Paul..
Thanks for "stopping in", and for the input!
I know your FM issues are long solved, but you might
be interested in knowing how this turns out.
-------------------------------------

As far as my situation:
Doc yesterday discovered its kidney stones.
Not just one tho...
"You hit the jackpot" he said...
Heh.. my luck is like that.
Its been non stop intense agony..
Funny tho.. the last few hours there's been a lul.
I just feel lousy overall, for the moment.

Doc wanted me to go to his recommended urologist
at 8AM this past morning, for a procedure.
Problem was... said urologist was getting on a plane
at 11AM.
Doc called around to other uros, and they were all long
gone outa town for the holiday.

The reason he felt it so urgent... is that there are
also stones in the ureters.. which, if they get blocked
could cause the kidneys to back up and fail.
I'm told That can even be life threatening.

Bottom line is..
As long as I'm able to P... as opposed to "blowing up like
the Michelin man".. :yikes::

its just the pain to contend with till after the weekend.
:jawdrop:

So far, so good.. and we remain hopeful.
Emergency room is the only option.

Should make for a lovely Thanksgiving:sigh:

Greg
 
Oh man Greg - I'm sorry to hear about the kidney stones. They CAN be very serious, so don't rule out the emergency room if it comes to that. And for it to happen over a holiday weekend makes it worse. Please take lots of pain killers!

I've had friends and relatives go through stones. Most were very painful - some of the worst pain they'd ever experienced, so I'm very sorry you are going through that.

I had a large stone a few years back, but you don't want to hear my story. They caught it early - no blockage - no pain - and they had me in the operating room within two days to blast it with sound waves. I got lucky - next time I probably won't.

Oh, and what I had said in my initial post about getting better FM reception "naturally". I just assumed (like you said - lol) that your goal was to build the very best antenna possible without electronic help. Kinda like the "flat vs. equalizer" debate among people. So I apologize, cuz I am all about getting better reception ANY way I can.

Rob
 
Oh man Greg - I'm sorry to hear about the kidney stones. They CAN be very serious, so don't rule out the emergency room if it comes to that. And for it to happen over a holiday weekend makes it worse. Please take lots of pain killers!
I've had friends and relatives go through stones. Most were very painful - some of the worst pain they'd ever experienced, so I'm very sorry you are going through that.
Hi Rob...
Sorry for the delay in replying... I guess its obvious why.

Thanks so much for the kind thoughts!!! They help more than one
would think!
I had a large stone a few years back, but you don't want to hear my story. They caught it early - no blockage - no pain - and they had me in the operating room within two days to blast it with sound waves. I got lucky - next time I probably won't.
Sure, why not... This has turned into a kidney stone thread anyway.
For the moment at least.
Besides, the more I hear about it, the more I understand.

Incidently, there are preventative measures one can take. You
might not have to go thru it at all!
Oh, and what I had said in my initial post about getting better FM reception "naturally". I just assumed (like you said - lol) that your goal was to build the very best antenna possible without electronic help. Kinda like the "flat vs. equalizer" debate among people. So I apologize, cuz I am all about getting better reception ANY way I can.
Naah... I use and believe in RF amps.
Tho I do have one of those Archer boxes, I'm currently using a
Magnum Dynalab "Signal Sleuth" and highly recommend it!
I've no alegience to that company whatsoever. It just works as
claimed... Very well.
I'd have no decent reception at all without it.

I think what happened is something like this:
We read lots of things written by folks with strong opinions based
on their own experience and/or conventional wisdom they've
heard/read.
Then when we think we get a whiff of that we react to it.
Its up to us to sample opinion, experiment, then make our own
conclusions.

In my personal experience...
I've had and used the Archer.. I like it fine.
The conventional wisdom is that they amplify the noise.
What I've found is:
They don't ALWAYS.
With a good antenna, they don't in a particularly noticeable way,
or at least they pump up the signal so much more that the tuner's
quieting yields a big gain in S/N ratio!

With an antenna thats inadequate to the situation, they DO
increase the noise more than help the signal.
Due to the fact that they amplify the average... of both signal and
noise.

When I mainly used my Archer (for many yrs, 70s/80s) it was
connected to a roof-mount yagi on a hill with an unobstructed
view of the Twin towers/Empire state bldg, with all of NYCs
broadcasting antennas.
S-meter pegged with the Archer. Only difference compared to w/o
the Archer was the little bit of noise without was gone almost
completely.
I could barely tell the difference between FM and albums, and I
was probably the luckiest guy around.

Now, at a better location than this, I use the Archer with my lil MD
"Silver Ribbon" antenna.
A good match given that it has a one foot or so twinlead comming
out of it, and the Archer input is 300ohm.
(kinda odd that its 75ohm out)
That location is better in most ways.... including the fact that its
a private home with a mast. (broken coax at the moment)
However its all concrete construction including the roof tiles.
The Silver Ribbon/Archer combo doesn't work very well.
The Silver Ribbon is inadequate... as expected and advertised.
Adding the Archer just increases the noise with no difference in
signal.

A standard wire-dipole "as found in the box" doesn't work at all
in either location. Whether taped to a window or anywhere else.
I've tried it.
If it IS working for you, woohoo! You've found your solution.
You must be in a better position in relation to the transmitters you
want to receive.
My situation is more challenging... in this location at least.
In the other... the TV yagi on the pole works fine. Just needs
new coax.

What I've learned is this:
Its not a matter of improving reception "naturally'.
Its just that a sound antenna based on sound theory is a prerequsite
for good reception.
An amp, can only help give a bit more.
One piece of conventional wisdom IS true... as confirmed by
my experience.
An amp can't put signal where it aint.

I won't weigh in on the equalizer debate so as to not make this
post EVEN longer... lol.
Since I'm very opinionated on the matter.

-------------------------------------------
As far as whats going on with me:
I have (finally) a Doc appmt tomorrow with a specialist.
I bet I get the sound wave blasting... (kinda ironic for an AK member
when you think about it).

I do understand that it can be serious and didn't rule out ER, but..
things have changed a bit.
Late in the day on thanksgiving eve, the pain seemed to stop all
of a sudden... for the most part at least.
Just a smidge, and it stayed that way all thru thksgvng day.
VERY lucky for that!
Next day too.
Since, its been on and off. When on, not at bad as those first few
days, tho fairly bad at times, and moderate on those days when
its not so bad.

I can tell the stone in question moved... could tell day by day, actuallly.
Started out right rear, and worked its way to under the navel area.
Wierd...
Seems like its trying to pass... a good thing.. though I didn't think
it possible days ago and neither did the doc.

Drastic measures haven't been nescessary, tho action is definately
nescessary.

My B-day was tues, and it was a fairly bad day.
All in all, I'm not complaining, considering Thanksgiving went so
well.
Besides... I got a digital cam! ...so now I can start taking pics,
including of this ill-fated antenna project, once I get back to it.

Anywho...
Where the project stands is this:
Needless to say, I haven't moved forward at all.
What I need.... All I need, is a torch to solder the few remaining
joints at a few of the elbows, and to solder the heavy coax to
the copper tubing.
That, and a drill bit to drill a hole in the PVC cap for the female
F-connector I'm going to use.

When its done and I have pics, that'll make sense.

Sooo....
Its not all that far off, nor all that difficult.
Wouldda been conqured long since if I were 100%.
Shouldn't be long now.

With this condition, its not only the pain, which is totally overwhelming
at its worst, and debilitating when moderate.
Its also an awful overall malaise thats almost constant.
The doc gave me anti-nausea pills and I'm takin em:puke:

Even on the best days, I find myself holding my belly when walking
cuz of pain due to jiggling..:gigglemad:

When the 'ol lady goes over speed bumps... :yikes:
 
Glad to hear your Thanksgiving was alright after all. Hopefully the appt. tomorrow with the specialist will yield answers / treatment in the near future. Considering the amount of pain, I hope you don't pass the stone - major pain. Hopefully, it will stop moving around and find a resting place that doesn't block anything or cause a lot of pain. I'll cross my fingers.

As for the FM reception, I've wanted to try different antenna configurations in the bedroom to see (hear) what's possible, but I've been side tracked by cassettes. I received some in the mail from a friend of an AKer, and they sound GREAT. They were recorded using dbx noise reduction - something I hadn't tried before. So with metal tapes, dbx, and some of my favorite records, I'm making killer sounding tapes. This should keep me busy for a while - lol.

How's that for straying off topic? I am anxious to see pics of your project, and the results you achieve. Keep us posted on that - AND your stone removal journey.......we all like happy endings.

Rob
 
Thanks again Rob... it really does mean a lot!

To blazes with the topic.. its long screwed anyway.
I'll likely start a new thread when its completed and I have
results anyway.

As for the cassettes... :)
Thats what I got my deck for back in the day... making tapes for
the car and for friends... and playing tapes friends made for me.
Vastly increased my library and cheap.
Haven't used it in eons tho...

DBX, eh? hmm..
Another old electronic friend of mine, along with the Archer amp.
I use my DBX 119 daily with my bedroom receiver.
(bought new in 1973)
Makes radio more listenable while getting ready in the AM.
Used to use it for NR, making R2R tapes waaay back before cassette
was stereo.
Still have the tapes and the R2R.
In addition, I just got.. and FOR FREE!!! a Tandberg 64x R2R in
super mint condition, but thats another story for another thread.
While mint, its not usable... its tubed and hasn't been turned on in
many yrs, and the belts are all stretched out anyway.
Needs cleaning and lubing too..
My next project after the antenna.

I also have a 3BX that has one channel out... in the repair que.

Does your deck have DBX built in? What deck is it?
If not, how do you decode (expand) the DBX?

Re: the antenna...
Plz just indulge me with a bit of time..
I WILL complete it. :)
 
About the cassette decks with dbx built in, I have a Technics RS-B57R and an MCS 3590 (Technics built). They are almost identical, but the MCS has two dbx buttons. One for playing back dbx encoded tapes, and one labeled 'disc' that I just found out is for monitoring the playback of dbx encoded LP's (?).

Anyway, I know so little of the science behind dbx magic, I just know that it makes the tapes come alive with depth - great low end, and near silent s/n ratio. Hard to describe, but much better than Dolby B or C. I never liked Dolby - I would encode the tape when recording, then play it back without the Dolby - it sounded better that way (obviously an issue with the deck?).

If I playback a tape encoded with dbx, it sounds completely awful without engaging the dbx button. Like I said, I don't know the science behind it, I just recently discovered how it improves my tapes - now that I have two decks with dbx.

Oh, and take your time with the antenna project - you have bigger fish to fry right now....

Rob
 
Success!!!

Well, it does work.
Fairly well at that.

I'll cut to the chase then tell the back story and details about performance.
First off though, bear in mind the following.
Results are just preliminary.
I just slapped it together to see how it would perform.
There's still work to do to finish it, and that likely affects performance.
I've only just begun to mess around with placement... but I can
already tell its VERY critical, for those last few DB of signal.

Comparisons are to the MagnumDynalab ST-2 base loaded whip,
which worked better than anything else tried, but not very well at
all.
It only worked decent at all when out the window horizontally.
I'm in a ground floor appartment.
The quad has so far stayed indoors and only vertical.

On the very strong nearby stations (which I have no interest in)
it performs the same.
That is to say, that they come in at slightly more than a 4 on
a 5 scale tuning meter (MD FT-101 tuner).
4.5 is the real-world max ie: S9.
So, certainly no worse. They seem somehow more "solid" tho. <shrug>

On to the difficult stations which I DO want to get, and thats what
the whole thing is about.
ALL of them come in now, with between 1/2 and 1-1/2 points more
on the meter, depending.
Ie: if it was a 2 before, now its around a 3, etc.

Next. it IS a quiet antenna. Very noticable compared with the others.
Kinda like Noise Reduction.
Not so much the background hiss, but thats a good bit less too...
Mostly the hashy grunge that was equal to or just below signal
level on the weaker stations, but also considerably lower on the
stronger of the stations I'm trying to get.

Thats a BIG help in giving me that margin I need for stations to
be listenable quality.

All these advantages/improvments are ONLY in effect when its
pointed in the right direction.
It IS very directional... for those needing.

Its more sensitive on one side than the other, but just a bit.
Also, sometimes, if you turn it a tad past where the S is highest,
you find a spot where the S is lower but so is the noise!
Loops are wierd that way.
I noticed that since I'm alone today and have had to turn/move it
by ear, as I can't see the tuner from there.
When I'd go look at the tuner, it was half point or so lower, but I'd
placed it for lowest noise.
Its quieter at night.. but I'm sure thats cuz the neighbors insist on
using apliances that wipe out reception on both AM & FM on
Sundays when I listen.. :gigglemad:nono:

Height matters... more than I would've thought.
Since its on a microphone stand, its easy to move up and down.
When I first tried it, it was randomly around mid-height.
Later, I thought to raise it... to where the top was about 10" below
the ceiling.
The perf actually dropped off!
Slid it up and down and found an ideal point.
Somewhat lower than that high position yet above mid level did
best.
Again, I'm doing this all by ear.

Multipath is actually a bit worse.
It must be said though, I haven't tried it horizontal though, and the
ST-2 really only worked horizontal... it was much worse than the
quad vertical.
Also, I live in multipath hell here, with the sides of the building
right along the LOS to the signals I want to get.
This is inside an apartment too, remember.
When you zero in on the best direction for the signal, the multipath
drops to almost nil.

Oddly, sometimes the best angle isn't towards the transmitter.
In those cases, somewhere between 90 and 45 degrees off works
best.
Loops are wierd that way too.
I'm fairly sure its because of being in multipath hell that I'm experiencing
this.
The side nulls likely are canceling out the multipath.
That might be helpful those who live in a multipath hell of their own.

Now for the REALLY Wierd part...
It SOUNDS better!
For the life of me I can't understand why... but I'm certain theres
better/deeper bass..
Even moreso, I immediately noticed a much better sense of 3D.
Spatiality or whatever you wanna call it. Imaging/staging/placement
etc. Sounds like surround sound, whereas with the other antennas
it sounded "painted on the wall".
I'm sure I'm hearing it, its not a subtle difference.
I can't for the life of me understand or explain it.
I always thought a better antenna gives more signal QUANTITY,
but not QUALITY!
I'm stumped, but its definatly there.
I first noticed it on a weak station, and its the same on all, weak,
strong and medium, so its not an improvement just due to more
signal.
Its most noticable on the one station that was already a strong one.
Go figure.

Its big and its ugly.
Top-heavy and ungainly.
You won't want it in your living room.. not if made this way at least.
I wouldn't do it using the 1/2" copper tubing if doing it again.
Its just to heavy and ungainly.
Its really mainly about the mounting though, and copper tubing
is strong, self supporting, and integrates somewhat with PVC
couplings and tubing which makes figuring out mounting easier.
One of the big problems regarding that, is that it needs coax cuz
its 75ohms, and the coax has a mind of its own that makes it dang
near impossible to turn and maintain position.

I would definately use RG-59 in the future since RG-6 is just to
hard to work with.
Whatever little loss there might be with 59, particularly with my short
run of 25-30ft. or so, is a small price to pay.

If you were to duplicate this, It'd be better on a mast outdoors,
otherwise find a different way to make it, so its smaller and lighter.
I'd hoped to come up with something better than the crummy coax
version in the article/pic at the beginning of the thread.

I don't regret it, but its not livingroom material.

Wow! I just tuned in the only strong station of the ones I'm interested
in cuz the 8PM program I like just came on.
Its MUCH much less noisy!!!
This station was always good.. just a bit of background noise.
Very little actually. Combo of hiss and hash.
NOW.. I hear virtually none! Just a very tiny bit of residual hiss.
Comprable to groove or tape noise.
Thats a BIG and important improvement for me!!
HUGE 3D sound too... MUCH moreso than before!!!
Damned if I can figure out why on that though.


:worthless

Awrite Awrite.. I'll go take some. BRB.
I'll post more details and the back story then too.
 
Glad to see that you're up and about again, Muzak.

From my point of view, I judge your antenna project a great success! It's interesting, too, that you mention the 3-D improvement in the sound. With my almost 6-ft dipole project, that was one thing I noticed, too. Maybe the larger antennae "catch" the signal more completely or something.

I may try your project or some variation of it now. I live on the 2nd floor and there is an attic (well barely more than a crawlspace, really) just above me. If I can convince my landlord to let me drill a small hole to pass some coax thru, I could try and mount it up there. Of course, it would be a pain to have to get up there and re-orient the antenna constantly, so I'd probably still keep my silver ribbon for the stations I can already pull in.

Can't wait to see the pix.

Congratulations! :thmbsp:
 
Hi Mike!
Welcome to another Fla AK'er..


I would luv to make a multi element version!
Seen the javascript calculators on the web.

Permit me to humbly suggest... that you come up with
one and let us know how it works. :smoke:

Some gain is definately what I need.
Quieter is also a BIG plus, in my situation.
Thanks for yet some more affirmation that this approach
is the way to go!

First of all a cubical quad is inherently quieter than a yagi and you get more gain compared to the same amount of elements in a yagi. I have made a few 4 and 5 element quads out of wire for the elements and I use dowel pins as the spreaders for 2 meters on a 2x2" boom(144-148megz) and they work rather well indoors. The problem is that they have a footprint and you need to have about 4 foot of room for them. I will made a beam and test it against my 6 element yagi I have on the roof top sometime soon, thanks for the Idea for FM use as it should help out with my HD Sony receiver I have on the Luxman 1070!

-Mike
PS. I'm near Yankeetown- Crystal River area. And I hope your better soon as I type this I have a rotor cuff tear and the pills only take the edge off.
 
Pic

Here's the pic:

watermark.php


Forgive the messy living room... I'm in no condition.
Besides.. you don't wanna sound like a nagging wife, DO YOU?!:whip:

More later (if I'm up to it)
 
I may have missed it, but I don't think it was stated what the exterior of the Condo was covered with? IF stucco, it will most likely be over mesh. That's an RF blanket. It does two things, it keeps stray Rf inside the building and blocks external signals. Your base loaded whip outside, horizontal and working seems to suggest wall blockage? Also, the comment about "too high" seems to indicate the same - you're getting up above the window into the header area where the exterior stucco/mesh may be too?

OBTW- I have hereditary kidney stones (from dad). Now days they say to take meds and drink plenty of fluids to help them pass (yeah sure :(). In the old days, they'd say buy a case or two of beer and pi** that bugger out now !!
 
Ever since I saw that episode of Deadwood, where "Swearjin" had to deal with stones, I can't think about it without wincing severely.

I hope everything "passes" as painlessly as possible and soon, too.
 
Here's the pic:

watermark.php


Forgive the messy living room... I'm in no condition.
Besides.. you don't wanna sound like a nagging wife, DO YOU?!:whip:

More later (if I'm up to it)

As you have found out the cubical quad is directional and putting it near that window looks to be your best bet. So my question is How Does it SOUND???


Expiring minds need to know:yes:

-Mike
 
Hey all!

First off, I forgot to mention last evening..
After a first listening, I snapped a ferrite core on the coax as close
to the antenna as possible
It made a big reduction in noise.http://www.parts-express.com/pe/showdetl.cfm?Partnumber=110-452
110-452_s.jpg

In fairness, I did the same thing on the ST-2 whip last weekend
with the same result. (that was about all I could do that weekend)
(heh)
So I highly recommend trying that no matter what antenna you use.
Haven't tried it with twinlead, but thats worth a try for those using.
It really was a big reduction in noise.... which is not to say that
the quad didn't already majorly reduce the noise level by itself.

Also, thanks again to all for the well wishes and kind thoughts!!!
Its surprising how much better it makes ya feel.
I still feel bad for turning this into a medical thread.
I was thinking... maybe I should ask the owner to change the name
from AK to AudioGeriatrics or Medical Karma or similar.

Now for the backstory:
Fri was a rough day. Some are better than others tho a pattern
seems to be emerging... early in the day isn't to bad, but evening
the major pain sets in.
On fri, I had a migrane type headache on top of the rest.
Dunno if its related or not. The rest involves being nauseaus
to some degree all the time and just feeling generally weak and
lousy.
Fri was a get nothing done day. Sat morning was better... but if
ever there was a day ya wanted to just sit around, that was it.
In the AM it wasn't so bad so I got all ambitious. Put it in my head
that a quick trip to 2 local stores was do-able.
So I forced myself late in the day. Evening actually, by the time I
got out.

First RatShack... to return/exchange the microphone boom which
they mistakenly gave me instead of the stand.... back on the day
when the stone-pain started.
Come to think of it, it alllll started right there in RS that day.
Hmmmmm...
So there I was in R/S.. waiting for the return to be processed,
holding my gut and trying to fake a smile... lol.

Next stop... Lowes.. for the Propane for the torch.
The main thing needed for joining the last few copper elbows
to the copper tubes, and the coax to the copper tubes...
and a couple of other odds and ends, including a couple of copper
pipe clamps.
(I guess I saw the wrighting on the wall)

After barely making it home, I realized that was it... I really couldn't
get it done.
At least not that night, and in time for sunday listening.
Sunday is radio-music listening day begining with a great blues
show from 10AM-1PM.
Later, I'm going to mention the stations I'm trying go get, because
the situations are so diverse, it may help to understand better
the improvements the quad makes vs the challenges I'm trying to
overcome.

Sooo... obsessed with finally getting this thing done, I set about
trying to do what I could.
It pretty quickly became clear that setting up the mic stand and
stripping/pigtailing the coax was about all I was gonna be able to
get done b4 bedtime.

I knew that the quad structure would hold together... just barely
without completing the soldering..
(about half of it got soldered up successfully previously)
(heh.. thats when the pain first hit in a big way 2 weeks ago)
It would be real rickety, but if careful it might be good enough to
try it out.
Indeed it has been.
Since I now had the mic stand... and one end of the coax pigtailed,
all that was left to do, for it to pass signal to the tuner..
was to connect the coax to it.
Thats where the copper pipe clamps come in..
Glad I had the foresight to grab em.
Obviously the bare coax ends are clamped to the copper tubing
for now.

The point is..
Surely there'll be a better connection when the coax is soldered
on, and the pipes are soldered together.
That might yield a bit more signal at the tuner's terminal.
Also, since its so rickety, I could only turn it and move it around..
but not turn it sideways (for horizontal polarization) or put it out
the window, or even move it to every possible spot.

It did let me try it out... to see if its even worth the effort to complete.
It is.
Now, I can take my time to make it solid and pretty(er).
What should've been a one day project is something I can now
finish when I feel up to it, without keeping you all waiting for results.
Maybe I'll post a new thread (minus the kidney stones) that would
be more concise, when its in a finished state and I have more certain
data.
----------------------

The stations I want to get are as follows:
Nothing above 92.0.
ALL commercial garbage... both in content and SQ.
But....
Several nice things below 92, particularly on sundays.

There's a full-time 24/7 jazz station at 88.9
Its the most challenging to pull in, (it figures) but way worth it cuz
its good, and would give me listening pleasure not just on
sundays.
Its WDNA.org. Only 6KW, 47miles away almost directly to the south, over the horizon.
The side of the building parallel with my window is slightly in the
way of LOS.
Its so low power since it might interfere with TV ch-6.. heh.
Its further hobbled by the fact it shares the freq with a strong
NPR to the north only slightly further away... and another
broadcaster in the tampa area causing the FCC to make them
point the radiation pattern downwards in my direction.
Totally figures... the only 24/7 jazz station in the area, and a good
one.. hobbled in every way possible.

FM-Fool.com (a fantastic site btw) has it listed as -72.9DB down
at my location, and recommends a 10.2 ant height above average
terrain.
The real strong stations (which suk) are listed in the low to mid
-30s DB down.
Those you can pick up on a tooth filling... even in my RF-Hell here.

This station is the "holy grail" for me.
It even has decent SQ. Probably due to being so low budget that
they can't afford all the fancy modern digital junk.
They play CDs and some LPs.

With the ST-2 whip... noise level equal to or worse than signal..
fades in and out, with the NPR to the north fading in about a
quarter of the time.(muting off and filter-narrow)
So... unlistenable.
On the other hand... with the quad...
Still noisy... to noisy to listen to it as a "serious" source in the main
system, but noise lower than signal.
Good news is... with the tuner in mono... it sounds fine! (quad ant)
About a 3 to 3-1/2 on the meter when boosted with the MD "Signal-Sleuth".
Totally listenable with practically no noise if you listen in mono.
I could live with that if I have to... but if only I could get that lil bit
more for stereo.....
With the ST-2.. unlistenable is even with it out the window, in mono,
and with the Sleuth.

Next is the (1 year old) 24/7 classical station.
Its nowhere near as hobbled, and same distance away.
WKCP 89.7.
100KW (almost) from a 1000ft tower.
Over the horizon, at -59.4DB, (same transmitter site I think)
13.7ft recommended receive ant height here.
This one is still a challenge.
With the quad, it comes in at around a 3 on the meter, and 3-1/2
with the Sleuth engaged.
With the ST-2, it was about one point lower on the meter.
So.. its still a bit noisy. To much so to be a good source.
But now, the noise is in the background, rather than competing
with the signal... and theres less hashy noise (mainly just hiss)
then with the ST-2.

Next on the challenge list is:
WXEL 90.7, to the north.
30kw at 1000ft. 29mi, -62db.
I guess its bad terrain between, why the -62... so its a challenge.
Its LOS though.
Its an NPR with decent but variable SQ. Divided between talk,
Varied classical and to a lesser extent, jazz-type programing.
On sundays, they relay a great program called Music by the sea.
http://yachtamusic.com/
Its a real nice sunday afternoon show, featuring "Great American Songbook"
music. Ie: Swing/bigband/vocal.
Its streamed for those interested, and I really enjoy it.
Decent SQ... he plays about 50% CDs and 50% LPs!
...and brags about the "brand new audio chain".

This station was barely listenable with the ST-2, with the noise level
high enough to make it unplesant to listen.
(also partially blocked by the building side parallel)
On days with bad weather, much worse.
Mono didn't help much.
2 on the meter, 2-1/2 with sleuth engaged.
Now... with the quad.. 3 on the meter, 3-1/2 or a bit more with
sleuth. A bit more occurs with careful ant placement.
I didn't really feel up to experimenting to get every last bit.
Its now very listenable... bearable hiss in the background.
Didn't even feel the need to try the mono switch.
That gives me one more station as an option much of the time.

My tuner needs a 4 for good quieting.. 4-1/2 is dead silent.
(well almost)(not a "black background but like an LP or R2R)

Next is WKCP.
A highschool station. Well Board of Ed technically.
Mostly junk, but that GREAT blues show on sun mornings.
http://www.blueatheart.com/home.html

This one is a good news story.
With the ST-2... to noisy to enjoy.
Even with the Sleuth engaged.
Heavy hiss, competing with the signal...
Worse yet, very suceptible to the grungy-hash from the neighbor's
appliance... whatever it is, they insist on using all day every sunday.
A digital TV or computer, probably... I think its the upstairs neighbor
and whatever it is wipes out all RF reception.
This station is located due west, and most of my apartment and
the neighors are in that direction...
So, lots of noise between the ant and that station.
The best reception is near the windows for all the other staions
which are all north or south.

Its a 3kw station, 5mi away with a 100ft ant height, on top of the
school bldg. (lol)

With the ST-2, veeerry hard to listen to. To bad too, since the SQ
is good and the content is great... from 10AM till 1 PM.
With the quad... with some work at placement...
IT COMES IN GREAT!!!! WooHoo!! :thmbsp::ntwrthy::beerchug::nutz::rockon:

That leaves the only other station I care about:
WLRN 91.3, due south/south-east with less bounce of the bldg..
13.3mi, 1000ft tower-LOS. 50kw -38.4db here.
This one was never a problem to get.
With the ST-2.. about a 4 on the meter, 4.5 with sleuth.
Even upright/indoors it worked fine, only with a tad more multipath
and some more noise, compared to out the window horizontal.

This station has great SQ all the time... in fact I can't believe its FM radio.
They don't play files.. mp3 or any other type from servers.
Its all CD & LP. I wouldn't be surprised if they also have/play
DVD-A and/or SACD.
In any case, they have damn good sounding CD players.
There's a decent "mainstream" jazz show each night from
10pm-1am thats fairly decent.
On sunday nights though, there's a wonderful show called Night Train.
Hosted by a real old timer who has incredible knowledge.... and taste.
Its a somewhat historical show, with a 1 or 2 hour feature.
The feature is usually educational and fascinating.
There's the monthly installment of the Glenn Miller story
(or whatever he calls it) mainly during the war years.
Besides good music, its filled with stories and anecdotes of that
time.. like the difficulties the band members faced... for instance
after the fall of Paris, the men had families and couldn't send home
enough $$ to support them, and had to moonlight in the Cafes
of Paris... where ppl like Django Reinhardt would come and sit in.
Naturally he plays the recordings of that..
Or, the Tensions between the BBC and the U.S. Armed Forces
Radio ppl before D-Day, when BBC handled technical stuff and
A&R stuff.
There were conflicts in both technical matters, since the 2 organizations
just did things differently... and in artistic matters, like when the
BBC honchos forced Miller to incorporate. local talent... vocalists,
when
he rarely used them.
There was even a lengthy description of the vast directional antenna
arrays built along the British coast, to beam in the music to France
and Germany, as an important propaganda effort.

Other times, its historical stuff and accompanying music of other
important musical figures of the 20th century.
All with a swing/jazz focus.
The rest of the show, before and after the feature is incredibly
tastefully chosen jazz.
He plays about 50% LPs! ...particularly since much of this material
was never put on CD.. and likely will never be.
Including some radio transcriptions during the historical segment.

I hate missing this show... soooo much better than watching TV.

Sorry for the digression!
Its streamed from WLRN.org for those who may be interested.
-----------

This is another success story for the quad antenna, but for a
wierd
reason, and one I just can't figure out.
While it came in fine with the ST-2... just a small amount of background
hiss..
The sound is WAY better with the quad!!!
HUGE 3 dimensional enveloping sound.. Precise placement too.
Better bass too.
I just can't believe it.
As mentioned in yesterdays post, its the same on weak stations too.
So its not just the tuner working "better" due to more signal... or
even less noise.

I can't for the life of me figure out why this would happen, but I'm
SURE it is.
I'm a skeptic on that kind of thing too.. so at first I thought it was
just my ears or some such.. but its not.
Its real.

On this station... that was ok before... now its tremendous, and in
a SQ way!
I'd love to know why this is...
You'd think more signal would just help with quieting... not do
anything to the SQ... particularly since its an RF signal.
Go figure.

So thats the backstory, and the details promised last night.

Greg
 
About the cassette decks with dbx built in, I have a Technics RS-B57R and an MCS 3590 (Technics built). They are almost identical, but the MCS has two dbx buttons. One for playing back dbx encoded tapes, and one labeled 'disc' that I just found out is for monitoring the playback of dbx encoded LP's (?).
Hi Rob..
Very interesting...
I was only barely aware that they began incorporating DBX into cassette decks around
the end of the cassette era.
Do they have Dolby as well, or just DBX?
Anyway, I know so little of the science behind dbx magic, I just know that it makes the tapes come alive with depth - great low end, and near silent s/n ratio. Hard to describe, but much better than Dolby B or C. I never liked Dolby - I would encode the tape when recording, then play it back without the Dolby - it sounded better that way (obviously an issue with the deck?).

If I playback a tape encoded with dbx, it sounds completely awful without engaging the dbx button. Like I said, I don't know the science behind it, I just recently discovered how it improves my tapes - now that I have two decks with dbx.
First off, the way they basically work is this:
Dolby uses a HF boost and cut on encode/decode.
This is IIRC and I might have that backwards...
Its been since 1977 since they taught us this stuff at recording engineering school.
...and no, I'm not a recording engineer.
I did however learn it.
It was a "mid-term" program during college.
The month of January, 8hrs/day (sometimes more) followed by an optional 6 month
aprenticeship, which I did.
It was fantastic.
Some details are foggy now though.

DBX instead, uses dynamic range manipulation.
Compress on encode, expand on decode.
It makes it possible to gain more headroom on tape.. allowing a "hotter" avg level
on the tape.
It somehow works somewhat without encoding too.
For example, I use my dbx119 with my bedroom receiver daily.
Thats "decode" (expand) only.
On heavily compressed radio, it keeps the noise way down.
You hear the noise come up with the voice/music, but silence
in between.
Works rather well, as the noise is less annoying when you hear it only
during "activity".
You get this effect with tape too, in addition to the encode/decode advantage.

My DBX119 manual recommends recording with 1.4:1 encode compression,
and 1.4:1 decode expansion for live recordings... and 1.6:1 decode expansion
for pre-recorded material, ie: LPs and such, which are somewhat pre-compressed
for regular folks close-n-play recordplayers and systems.
That gives a bit more of that positive effect, along with making the music
a bit more punchy.

That worked great for me back in the early 70s for making R2R
tapes before cassette was stereo

The only drawback with DBX is mainly that you can hear it "breathing".
It really only happens with extreme compression/expansion ratios of
like 1.6:1 and more.
Not really applicable to built in DBX NR.

Dolby instead, messes with freq response, which can cause all sorts of
probs..
It needs calibration, via a calibration tone. Most decks don't have that and
are inacurate.
It causes freq response anomalies.
Thats as best as I can remember anyway.
Somehow or other, the noise doesn't come back on the decode.

That why your Dolbized cassetes sound better, is just cuz the HFs get boosted
on the encode side...
No different than turning up the treble knob.
 
Glad to see that you're up and about again, Muzak.

From my point of view, I judge your antenna project a great success! It's interesting, too, that you mention the 3-D improvement in the sound. With my almost 6-ft dipole project, that was one thing I noticed, too. Maybe the larger antennae "catch" the signal more completely or something.

I may try your project or some variation of it now. I live on the 2nd floor and there is an attic (well barely more than a crawlspace, really) just above me. If I can convince my landlord to let me drill a small hole to pass some coax thru, I could try and mount it up there. Of course, it would be a pain to have to get up there and re-orient the antenna constantly, so I'd probably still keep my silver ribbon for the stations I can already pull in.

Can't wait to see the pix.

Congratulations! :thmbsp:
Hi Asha..
Thanks for the kind wishes and the congrats..

I'm not sure its a *great* success.. I was hoping for even more,
but I think my expectations were unreasonable.
I live where I live, and it is what it is... I guess this is about the
best it can get.

Having said that, I am convinced it is a success... this is a good
type of antenna for FM and maybe the best type period.
Both indoors and probably up on a mast too.

I hope someone more knowledgable weighs in on why the SQ improvement...
Danged if I can figger it out... but hey, whatever works.

Heres a suggestion on your attic/landlord dilemma:
First off, if you have a coax wallplate for cable tv... you *might* be able to
just get a dual F connector wall plate, and run coax up into the crawlspace
with a snake parallel to the coax thats already there.

For mounting, if there's adequate height, you might use one of those
tripod mounts made for room mounting. It might work.

As for turning it..
Theres always the rotator option...

I do hope you try making a quad... I'd luv to hear if your results are similar.
I strongly suggest, however, you make it as simple as possible at first,
to see if it works for you.
 
"Hi Rob..
Very interesting...
I was only barely aware that they began incorporating DBX into cassette decks around
the end of the cassette era.
Do they have Dolby as well, or just DBX?"

Hey Greg - my two decks with dbx also have Dolby B & C (mid 80's models without HX PRO or Dolby S), and your explanation does sound right - from what little I've read about it. Hotter recordings can be made with dbx - when I switch it on - red fluorescent segments in the meters appear that go up to +18db!

Your antenna project sounds like a success. I'm sure I will attempt something like this one day - fearing my stucco covered building will wreak havoc. I'll cross my fingers.

I'll pick up a ferrite core, also - anything to reduce noise - and the price is right.

Thanks for the update on your health - you can never be too careful...

Rob
 
First of all a cubical quad is inherently quieter than a yagi and you get more gain compared to the same amount of elements in a yagi. I have made a few 4 and 5 element quads out of wire for the elements and I use dowel pins as the spreaders for 2 meters on a 2x2" boom(144-148megz) and they work rather well indoors. The problem is that they have a footprint and you need to have about 4 foot of room for them. I will made a beam and test it against my 6 element yagi I have on the roof top sometime soon, thanks for the Idea for FM use as it should help out with my HD Sony receiver I have on the Luxman 1070!

Hi Mike...
First off, why is it that a quad is inherently quieter than a yagi?
I forget the theory now..

I'm reeeeally anxious to see what you come up with, particularly how you
put together a multi-element quad..
...and give details I can copy. hehe..

I wouldn't mind later on, making one thats real sturdy/durable for long term
mounting on the mast at the home I'll be moving into in a few months.
As you have found out the cubical quad is directional and putting it near that window looks to be your best bet. So my question is How Does it SOUND???
Expiring minds need to know:yes:
As mentioned in the above posts... it sounds phenomenal.
I'm kinda hoping, with your RF knowledge, you might be able to explain how
this is possible!
I can only figure that it should improve noise and such due to greater signal,
directionality/nulls, and being a quieter antenna type.

PS. I'm near Yankeetown- Crystal River area.
And I hope your better soon as I type this I have a rotor cuff tear and the pills only
take the edge off.
Wow.. we seem to have a large Fla. contingent.
Its such a big state though.. and lengthwise, that things up your way
are totally different than down here.
Maybe there's some things in common though.

Sorry to hear you're having the rotator cuff prob...
I hear its right up there with kidney stones pain-wise.
Man... this really is the geriatric ward thread.
The pills definately only take the edge off... and with so many drawbacks too.
I've had to work around the euphoirc stupor when they kick in,
to be able to get anything done.
Its why I don't really wanna solder with a torch just now..:lazer::yikes:
 
"Hi Rob..
Hey Greg - my two decks with dbx also have Dolby B & C (mid 80's models without HX PRO or Dolby S), and your explanation does sound right - from what little I've read about it. Hotter recordings can be made with dbx - when I switch it on - red fluorescent segments in the meters appear that go up to +18db!
Wow.. interesting.
+18db is a LOT of extra headroom! No wonder if makes such a big imrpovment.
Wish I wouldda picked up one of those decks back in the day...
Have you ever tried the DBX and Dolby together?
You might try getting the Dolby calibrated, if thats the issue.
It might get better still!
Your antenna project sounds like a success. I'm sure I will attempt something like this one day - fearing my stucco covered building will wreak havoc. I'll cross my fingers.
I hope you do... I think you'll be impressed.
I think these bldgs are stucco covered and its working good here.

You might also want to consider doing the simple coax version of the quad
in/around the window you have the dipole in (IIRC), which seems to work for
you.
I'll pick up a ferrite core, also - anything to reduce noise - and the price is right.
Definately!
Don't expect miracles though... but it is noticible.
Especially when every bit counts ....noise-wise. Signal to noise ratio-wise.
Thanks for the update on your health
- you can never be too careful...
You know... its amazing how kind and caring folks on AK are.
Maybe thats why they call it audio-Karma.

As far as the condition goes....
The doc appmt las fri wasn't real good news.
Seems I've got multiple stones... in both kidneys.
Something on the order of 7 or so each...
Some small and at least 2 per kidney LARGE.
To large to ever pass... or so the Doc says.
Worse yet, there's at least one large one in the
ureters.. the tubes connecting kidneys to bladder.

Thing is... they can't bust em up when they're in the tubes.
AND... that can block them so the kidneys get backed up.
If that happens... its way serious. The kidneys fail.
If both kidneys get blocked at the same time.. yer a gonner.

Sooo... the procedure is, they go in... um.. thru yer willie..
with a tool and a stent.
They push the stones back up into the kidney... easier than
pulling em out..
then they bust em up with pounding ultrasound.
The stent is left behind for a week or so... allaway
down thru willie...
so the busted up stones can flow out.
Heh..

Only one kidney can be done at a time, about 30days apart.
So you have to go thru this twice.

Doc says, in the long term its gotta be done lest the stones
grow even bigger causing kidney failure..
Then its 24/7 dialisys... or worse.
In the short term.. its just a matter of how long do you wanna
live this way.

Problem is... total cost is around 10 grand.
Guess who doesn't have that laying around...
Paying it off... assuming I have that option, will take
many many years.
I have no insurance..

This is the first serious medical thing I've ever faced.

Well.. at least I have my quad project and AK to distract me!

Greg
 
Back
Top Bottom