As far as the foam on the tweeter baffle...has anyone attempted to use something of more substance like nonsynthetic felt , i.e. wool? Would it net different results than the foam? The reason I ask is because I have seen felt used in other speaker designs as a means to control edge defraction.
You can see from the measurements using foam that the results are not uniform across the bandwidth, and would require re-optimization of the filter(s). I view redesigning the speakers themselves as beyond the scope here, though I may yet try a reticulated foam pad in the grille. It's apparent, as Ray observed, that there's a mess of stuff going on between the baffle and the grille.
Stuffing - anyone care to comment on what to stuff them with and how if in fact they need to be stuffed?
It's polyester in the ones I have, and for the closed-box version, at least, fiberglass may be a better choice. I will try that.
Cabinet - anyone care to comment on what to use to dampen the metal cabinet or is it a nonissue?
Resonance certainly was an issue when I altered the balance with BSC, which likely means it's there, but less audible, all the time. There are well-known means available to treat that, but precious little room inside the box to apply them. A wood veneer on the outside like the Cantons would be a good option, in my view.
OBTW, I have been following the Econowave project with an area friend and we may tackle that one too. I find NE Winter days go by much faster when you establish projects to accomplish.
That's a worthy endeavor, as well, I would say....
My original PB-1 mod was designed to provide flat response in the tweeter passband, ignoring the 3.8 K peak (which as I recall is less above the tweeter axis), with some lift above 10 K to compensate for the narrowing dispersion of the tweeter.
It's easy enough for me to do some rudimentary polars here, Pete, and I will do that, also.... :yes: