fisher 400 review (1963)
- Thread starter radioactive
- Start date
Register to hide this ad
radioactive
tube gear fanatic
me either, and your right its fun to read the reviews and i enjoy posting them.
chris
radioactive
tube gear fanatic
not a problem
radioactive
tube gear fanatic
ask and you shall receive .it'll be posted shortly.the review was actually from march of 1962.
chris
radioactive
tube gear fanatic
back by popular demand
radioactive
tube gear fanatic
hi snapper,
once a year:scratch2: i used to post them quite often. heres a list of some of the reviews i posted here on ak but beware some of them were lost due to a server crash awhile back but if theres any that you want let me know as i do have them somewhere either on the computer or the mags themself which i got them from.http://audiokarma.org/forums/search.php?searchid=1504164&pp=25&page=2
once a year:scratch2: i used to post them quite often. heres a list of some of the reviews i posted here on ak but beware some of them were lost due to a server crash awhile back but if theres any that you want let me know as i do have them somewhere either on the computer or the mags themself which i got them from.http://audiokarma.org/forums/search.php?searchid=1504164&pp=25&page=2
David K
Shake it Shake it Sugaree
Hey Chris,
WOW, you appear to be quite a resource for many vintage reviews. I, am most grateful for your review on the Fisher 400.
AK people need to remember "Search, Key word:review, Posts made by :Radioactive" to enter in their search parameters to locate a wide array of vintage reviews that you have taken the time and trouble to provide for us.
Best,
David
WOW, you appear to be quite a resource for many vintage reviews. I, am most grateful for your review on the Fisher 400.
AK people need to remember "Search, Key word:review, Posts made by :Radioactive" to enter in their search parameters to locate a wide array of vintage reviews that you have taken the time and trouble to provide for us.
Best,
David
mhardy6647
Lunatic Member
Funnily enough, I don't own a 400 either 
I do own a 500C, but I think I've preferred the sound of the 400's I worked on. Not that I ever A-B'd them, though.
A gratuitous aside for Snapper's benefit (?): In the not-too-distant past, and for a long time, I ran a glycoprotein carbohydrate analytical laboratory for a large biotechnology company. A colleague, knowing I was a Dead fan and a carbohydrate biochemist of some repute, dubbed our group the "Sugarees".
I do own a 500C, but I think I've preferred the sound of the 400's I worked on. Not that I ever A-B'd them, though.A gratuitous aside for Snapper's benefit (?): In the not-too-distant past, and for a long time, I ran a glycoprotein carbohydrate analytical laboratory for a large biotechnology company. A colleague, knowing I was a Dead fan and a carbohydrate biochemist of some repute, dubbed our group the "Sugarees".
digtubeess
Active Member
Could we discuss the article?
Interesting points may be the graph that shows,
zero distorion up to 7 watt.
the statment about extreme attenuation for bass , looking at the graph seems to me bass is cut before the 50 cps? and lastly the riaa is excellent wonder which cart/deck they used to test it.
very nice find saved it to the docs, could i ask what publication is it?
Interesting points may be the graph that shows,
zero distorion up to 7 watt.
the statment about extreme attenuation for bass , looking at the graph seems to me bass is cut before the 50 cps? and lastly the riaa is excellent wonder which cart/deck they used to test it.
very nice find saved it to the docs, could i ask what publication is it?
fisherlover
Active Member
hopefully my fisher 400 will be done by this weekend
she's singing again, thanks to mhardy6647 for posting great pictures and answering all of my questions
thanks radioactive for the reviews
i will surely print and frame the reviews
she's singing again, thanks to mhardy6647 for posting great pictures and answering all of my questions
thanks radioactive for the reviews
i will surely print and frame the reviews
radioactive
tube gear fanatic
hi digtubess ,
the review came from high fidelity magazine.most of the reviews that i posted came from either "high fidelity" or "audio" mags from the 50's and 60's.
fisherlover ,
your welcome i enjoyed scanning them and posted them.
the review came from high fidelity magazine.most of the reviews that i posted came from either "high fidelity" or "audio" mags from the 50's and 60's.
fisherlover ,
your welcome i enjoyed scanning them and posted them.
Ballylongford
Bailey ; He's a great guy
Thanks for the review; my Fisher 400 is one of my favorite pieces of tube gear, and I like the sound of it a lot more than the several 500cs I've owned
radioactive
tube gear fanatic
hi bally,
thanks.i'd love to try a fisher receiver oneday.of all the gear thats passed through here i never have had any fisher gear except a tuner that needs work.mabe oneday ill have one.
chris
thanks.i'd love to try a fisher receiver oneday.of all the gear thats passed through here i never have had any fisher gear except a tuner that needs work.mabe oneday ill have one.
chris
