I've been listening to mine in the downstairs system, turntable ( in sig) to an AVA Super Pass III, to a DIY P-P 6550/KT88 amp and indignias. Its taken a little time to aclimate to them, having been used to much larger higher efficiency speakers. They are located in a room that normally where my A7s are, so it may be a little large. I have them closer together than the A7s, and sitting position is much closer.
Like many have already said, they have mini monitor imaging, which is a good thing. Measuring with a rat shack sound level meter, they seem to play best in the mid to high 80 db zone. This is at the listening position, by the way.
When increased to the 90's, they begin to show some strain. Again, the room is a little large for these personal scale speakers. Also, this is with a turntable which with these speakers there is a little woofer dance, so may be cleaner at higher volumes with cds, or utilizing a subsonic filter. I am currently listening to a few disc that I am very familiar with, to get a good working knowledge and familiarity with their sound. Once this is done, I got some comparing to do!
I have two speakers, both DIY projects I intend to make the comparisons with. First is a very similar speaker in terms of cubic feet, my clone of the JM Labs Micron. I built these after a very favorable review done by Stereophile
in the 90's. The review revealed the Cu Ft of the box, as well as the tuning frequency. Also revealed was th emodel number of the focal drivers that were used. At the time, Focal sold these drivers to the DIY crowd, but has since severly limited what it sells part wise. Kimon from Focal America was kind enough to send me the crossover schematic. A friend and I constructed boxes from a double layer of 1/2 mdf, and they are bi wireable. Tweeter is a one inch inverted dome, with titanium dome. The woofer is a double voice coil 5 1/4 inch driver, cone is made of neoflex.
These drivers were considerably more expensive than those used in Indignia,
but I dont anticipate that Indignia and its less expensive drivers will be embarrassed by any stretch. anywho, I think it will make for an interesting comparison.
The second comparison speaker is another a DIY effort from the 90's, the Aria 5. This is a design of Joseph Diappolito, and also uses two focal mid woofers and a one inch titanium inverted dome tweeter, but this is a slightly newer driver than the one in the Micron clone. Its dome is treated with titanium dioxide, which leaves it a dark grey/black color. It also has some sort of a small lens in front of the dome. The woofers are 2 to the side, in "Diappolito" alignment. The woofers have kevlar cones, and are also 5 1/4 inch in diameter. Again, these are considerably more expensive drivers than used in the Indignia, and it will also be a good comparison for a little more upscale (pricewise) speaker.
The Aria 5 speakers are usually positioned to either side of my flat screen, so are in constant use. The microns dont see that much use, so will need to be "broken in" just a little.
What do I anticipate? I think Indignia is not going to be embarrased in this comparison at all. Performance between Indignia and Micron should be similar, Micron may take higher power a little more gracefully, but we will see.
The Aria will be a little more intense of a comparison, and a little less fair. While Indignia was less than 300 in 2009 dollars, I spent in the neighborhood of 850 1990's dollars building the Arias. Plus, with its double woofers, dynamics are very well handled. I think a Diappolito alignment with dual 6 1/2 inch Dayton aluminum drivers would be a little more fair. Anyway, the comparo is on.
I also plan to bring Indignia to Jaymana's June bash, so hopefully a few more opinions will be forth coming. Stay tuned!:thmbsp:
russellc