Im sorry but are you nuts? That looks like a 2x4 Expedit you have that amp on!!! And it's on it's side a weaker orientation. I can see the shelves saging from all the record weight and the sides look to be bulging out. Just look at the effects that amp is doing to the left one opposed to the right one.
A better pre-amp means more dynamic range lower distortion and a tendency to want to listen at higher levels, it allows your Dynavector to strut its stuff. A better pre-amp deserves a better amp. Which deserves better speakers. See the connection! Your speakers will sound better with the C-48, your speakers will sound better and be protected by the newer amps with Power Guard and additional 20 db signal to noise, The system will sound better with updated speakers. Its a process, not just buying a pre-amp. Then items such as MEN 220 should be considered to help optimize the system to the room and your chosen listening position.
If you are happy with your system then I applaud you. I have the same TT you do, had the same arm and Like you have a Dynavector. But I have the itch for a new VPI Prime with the epoxy tone arm, or maybe a Aries IIID. 15 db lower rumble and other noises, 1/2 to 1/3 the wow and flutter than our TT and a better non resonant arm. That's a big step up in the scheme of things. But is vinyl worth the dollars? Obviously from your picture its something to consider for you as I consider for me. Having a C-48 or the C-22 III will improve your phono section. I wish Mac would build a separate phono pre-amp, so I could update my C-34. I can't use the new pre-amps because of the width increase and much deeper depth.
Me too! Those are going to be a very popular TT so hopefully we'll see a few appearing on the used market in a couple of years.But I have the itch for a new VPI Prime with the epoxy tone arm.
You're doing well and give hope to us all who have kids, or are thinking of having kids.It's not that I wouldn't love to collect a handful of McIntosh gear, but with 3 kids under 5
I'll second damacman's suggestion. Any stereo image will be disrupted by having the speakers that close. I don't know enough about acoustics to opine, but I would also worry about some kind of comb effect. Truly, repositioning the speakers will make a greater difference than changing the preamp.
On the preamp, can you explain why your choices are 32 vs 48 (which has a DAC built in)?
Unless you really want the DAC, it seems you've left out a bunch of alternatives, like 33, 34V, 40, 42, 46...
I have a C-42 in an office system, which is a more modern design than the C-32, but won't hit the bank like a C-48. And then, there's also a used C-220, which would allow you to play with tubes... choices, choices.
Hi Guys,
Just thought I'd put out a little update. I received the C48 last month and while a great unit, I could tell pretty quickly it wasn't for me. Compared to the C32 it sounded much sharper and more boxed in. While the JBL 4312's sounded good enough with it, the Meyer Sound HD-1 powered speakers sounded very harsh, almost unlistenable at high volumes. Even when cranked with just the JBL's there was some ear fatigue and the music didn't sing and dance around the room like with the vintage McIntosh stuff.
I called up the seller about an exchange and settled on a pristine C34V. It arrived the other day and voila! That's what I'm talking about! Great clarity and presence of sound even when cranked and all the speakers pair well with it. Whew! So the final system is now: McIntosh MC2300 - McIntosh C34V - Oppo BDP-105 - Thorens TD-125 MKII with SME M2-9R arm & Dynavector 20X2 cartridge - JBL 4312's - Meyer Sound HD-1's
Goes to show that not all units even from the same maker go well together (as we know) and that the tone one is searching for is major factor not to be underestimated. Happy listening and Happy Memorial Day everyone!