Fisher X100 vs Scott 299 vs modern???

j free

j free

Active Member
I would like some thoughts. I currently have a Proton 550 integrated with big Mission 765 speakers. I'm looking to make a change. I've been eyeing out modern hybrids, in particular. Line Magnetic/Rogue Cronos/Vincent. I also see a vendor here with some nicely restored vintage units, the Scott and Fisher in particular. How would these vintage units stack up against modern? I love the idea of vintage, not sure if the sound will disappoint though. Any thoughts/info appreciated.
 
I have a Fisher x100B and had a Scott 299B.
299 was a much more robust unit with ginormus OPTs and PT.
Well built and killer looking with gold front panel and knobs
100B is a more 'classy' looking unit, well built, clean straight wireing, good sound, as the 299 did.
Either Scott or Fisher sound will definately please the ear.
Your choice.
 
I would look into one of the bigger Fisher's KX200, 202B, or the like unless you want
to use the the 7189 tube look into a 222C or D nice sounding amp.

Tube
 
The Fisher and the Scott are both great amps, and certainly stand up against comparable modern units.
Given the choice between those two specific models, I prefer the Scott.
 
I kinda regret letting go of a 299C but wouldn't be using it if I had it.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
 
What naptown Rob say's is true, I had a Conrad Johnson system before and tell you
the truth I love the sound of my Fisher's and Eico more. There's something about
the sound.

Tube
 
Pio1980 said:
I kinda regret letting go of a 299C but wouldn't be using it if I had it.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Why not?
So you guys feel this would function well as a main/living room amp. Vs keeping what I've got, or going modern hybrid?
 
j free said:
Why not?
So you guys feel this would function well as a main/living room amp. Vs keeping what I've got, or going modern hybrid?
Click to expand...

I was into assembling a transparent system, the amp had too much character of its own to be of interest in a working system. It'd still he the same situation, I can do better and have done so with a basic amp and a passive controller. The amp was too theatrically tubey sounding to be of interest to me.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
 
Sherwoods are sleepers. Little tighter working conditions. Great build quality, copper chassis is cool. Nice looking/ nice sounding units.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

2sixR
Seeking Advice - Fisher, Scott, Sherwood or New
Replies
17
Views
4K
robert_kc
robert_kc
Back
Top Bottom