My new passive preamp: S&B TX-102 transformer volume control

Redboy

a few good watts
Subscriber
doucanoe asked for pictures, so I thought a thread might be in order. This is new to me, but not new. It's a passive preamplifier, a transformer volume control built around a pair of Stevens and Billington TX-102 transformers. Single input, single output with a mute switch.

The previous owner bought it new, purchased from K&K Audio. They built it, and they certainly did a nice job!

That's a Seiden switch. High end Vampire RCAs. Check out the nice knob, too!

How does it sound? Pretty phenomenal, I think.

IMG_8958.JPG

IMG_8963.JPG

IMG_8966.JPG

IMG_8974.JPG

IMG_8967.JPG

IMG_8970.JPG

IMG_8971.JPG
 
Last edited:
Nice.

I assume you are giving it a test drive. In your pic you have two sources.

Where or how do you think you will use it?

Someday in my hifi journey I expect to give a passive preamp a try.
 
Sweet, what does the double toggle on the back panel switch?
If it is only1 ea. In and Out? Thanks, they did a nice build, I like 'm clean
 
Very cool and great photos. And I have no real understanding of a passive preamplifier or what it does.
 
Nifty!
I'm going to have to get over and hear it sometime soon. It will be interesting to compare with the Promitheus.

RC
 
Very nice. I've been curious about transformer-based volume controls - I'd be interested if you could elaborate on "phenomenal" as a description of the sound :)
 
I admire this apparatus, and certainly the quality of workmanship. But I seriously question the nomenclature.

Could it perhaps be called a volume control?

Passive Preamplifier seems a trifle oxymoronic....dontcha think....? :scratch2: Amplification is usually an active step. Transformers can indeed improve transmission, but amplify seems kinda extreme in describing what this inline variable attenuator does.... Mebbe I'm missing something here....

The English "language" is always intriguing to me....

Oh don't mind me; I know I'm a certified left-handed nut! :eek:

At any rate it must sound great. :thmbsp:
 
Very nice Nate! Very simple. Is it going to be a problem that it only has one set of inputs?

TC
 
I admire this apparatus, and certainly the quality of workmanship. But I seriously question the nomenclature.

Could it perhaps be called a volume control?

Passive Preamplifier seems a trifle oxymoronic....dontcha think....? :scratch2: Amplification is usually an active step. Transformers can indeed improve transmission, but amplify seems kinda extreme in describing what this inline variable attenuator does.... Mebbe I'm missing something here....

The English "language" is always intriguing to me....

Oh don't mind me; I know I'm a certified left-handed nut! :eek:

At any rate it must sound great. :thmbsp:

It may help to think of "pre" as "before" amplifier.
Besides, the transformers have a 6 db boost option making them amplifiers.
 
I assume you are giving it a test drive. In your pic you have two sources.

Where or how do you think you will use it?

Someday in my hifi journey I expect to give a passive preamp a try.
One of the first things I will do is rewire this thing to have two sets of inputs. I'll do away with the mute switch, I think, and make that a selector switch.

Sweet, what does the double toggle on the back panel switch?
If it is only1 ea. In and Out? Thanks, they did a nice build, I like 'm clean
The back panel switch selects between "connected" and "isolated" ground. So far I'm not hearing a difference between the two.

Very nice. I've been curious about transformer-based volume controls - I'd be interested if you could elaborate on "phenomenal" as a description of the sound :)
Rich, I've been a fan of simple potentiometer-based volume attenuators in my system. This one has similar characteristics, but the sound is somehow "fuller." There seems to be more detail at lower volumes especially, and resolution overall is excellent. I'm not very good at describing sound in general, but this is the best I've heard here.

I like the idea of as little as possible between me and the source. I know these things are quite system sensitive, having to do with input impedances and other things I don't understand. I hoped for a good fit based on my experience with other passives, and it has played out well so far.
 
Rich, I've been a fan of simple potentiometer-based volume attenuators in my system. This one has similar characteristics, but the sound is somehow "fuller." There seems to be more detail at lower volumes especially, and resolution overall is excellent. I'm not very good at describing sound in general, but this is the best I've heard here.

I like the idea of as little as possible between me and the source. I know these things are quite system sensitive, having to do with input impedances and other things I don't understand. I hoped for a good fit based on my experience with other passives, and it has played out well so far.

Thanks, Nate, that makes sense to me. I've found pot-based passives to sound a bit thin, so if it has their good features plus a fuller sound, that seems pretty much perfect.
 
I believe you would be isolated ground. Isolated would be to panel, via outside ground rod.
connected should be component to component ground.
Should be right, although...
 
I finally got around to adding another set of inputs to this thing. I sacrificed the Mute switch on the front panel and converted it to a Source selector.

Before (from the first post of this thread):

attachment.php




...and after:

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • IMG_9183.jpg
    IMG_9183.jpg
    70.9 KB · Views: 1,175
  • IMG_9199.jpg
    IMG_9199.jpg
    57.1 KB · Views: 406
Last edited:
The seller also included a second beautiful wooden knob, which I think looks mighty nice against ejfud's casework on my 2A3 amp... :yes:

attachment.php


attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • IMG_9190.jpg
    IMG_9190.jpg
    56 KB · Views: 251
  • IMG_9193.jpg
    IMG_9193.jpg
    58 KB · Views: 260
Back
Top Bottom