Audiokarma.org
Audiokarma Featured Sponsor

Go Back   AudioKarma.org Home Audio Stereo Discussion Forums > McIntosh Audio


We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-24-2008, 09:36 AM
Nikko75's Avatar
Nikko75 Nikko75 is offline
Listener and Music Lover
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NZ
Posts: 1,859
McIntosh MC2505 very curious

I am wondering where the MC2505 stands as far as sound quality and reliability. I have no experience with that amplifier.
__________________
The Hydrogen Fuel Car, brought to us from the people who conceived the Hindenburg.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-24-2008, 10:10 AM
Mike Gibson's Avatar
Mike Gibson Mike Gibson is offline
Modulator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dufur Oregon
Posts: 7,300
I've had one since 1971 and it's been in the shop once. It's been a daily player in one capacity or another. It's probably one of three or four amps that were the most popular in it's day and they still get a lot of attention today.

This was one of the first SS amps that McIntosh built and the sound is one of three reasons I bought the amp. The other two were the three year warranty (unheard of at that time) and looks.

I've been told at an amplifier clinic they tried to voice it like a tube amp. IMHO they succeeded admirably. There were something like 11-12K sold so they must have done something right.

The only caution I can think of is it should be serviced if it hasn't been already. To modernize the caps and such.
__________________
Yorx All in Wonder, Sound Design speakers, Mickey Mouse TOTL TT, Spongebob CD player. These components are fed pure clean mountain fresh AC power from a Jameson Current Bush


"Speed is fine but accuracy is final". Wyatt Earp 1888.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-24-2008, 11:53 AM
Nikko75's Avatar
Nikko75 Nikko75 is offline
Listener and Music Lover
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NZ
Posts: 1,859
I think I would like one to see what MC was like back then.
__________________
The Hydrogen Fuel Car, brought to us from the people who conceived the Hindenburg.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-24-2008, 05:34 PM
onemug's Avatar
onemug onemug is offline
Wanna play?
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,010
I had one for a long time. Took it to a Mac clinic, way back when, and it tested at 73 watts per channel.

SQ is very representative of the ol Mac sound.

Reliability, well it's closing in on 40 yrs old. I would have a tech check it out and it will probably last another 40.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-25-2008, 07:06 AM
Gregory's Avatar
Gregory Gregory is offline
Radical Lab Animal
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Potomac Falls, Virginia
Posts: 2,573
Quote:
Originally Posted by onemug View Post
I had one for a long time. Took it to a Mac clinic, way back when, and it tested at 73 watts per channel. Reliability, well it's closing in on 40 yrs old. I would have a tech check it out and it will probably last another 40.
A few months ago after sorting through the aftermath of an interstate move, I hooked up the 2505 and it sounded good.. and ran fine after all these years without ANY signs of malfunction. It could use a good servicing including caps, deoxing and lube. The sheet metal screws had turned green but are shined up now. When switching to the 2205 however, it becomes apparent there was a whole different level of power and sound quality present. The 2505 is still a fine specimen of electronics from the early Solid State era!!

-Gregory
Reply With Quote
Audiokarma
  #6  
Old 05-25-2008, 09:41 AM
onemug's Avatar
onemug onemug is offline
Wanna play?
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,010
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gregory View Post
A few months ago after sorting through the aftermath of an interstate move, I hooked up the 2505 and it sounded good.. and ran fine after all these years without ANY signs of malfunction. It could use a good servicing including caps, deoxing and lube. The sheet metal screws had turned green but are shined up now. When switching to the 2205 however, it becomes apparent there was a whole different level of power and sound quality present. The 2505 is still a fine specimen of electronics from the early Solid State era!!

-Gregory
Gregory,

We were on similar paths. I noticed a big difference also when I got my 2205. I really loved that amp. Next was the 2255, not so different.

What has been your path after the 2205?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-25-2008, 10:41 AM
Gregory's Avatar
Gregory Gregory is offline
Radical Lab Animal
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Potomac Falls, Virginia
Posts: 2,573
Quote:
Originally Posted by onemug View Post
Gregory,

We were on similar paths. I noticed a big difference also when I got my 2205. I really loved that amp. Next was the 2255, not so different.

What has been your path after the 2205?
My McIntosh amplifier path was the following second-hand Mc dealer trading:

11-28-1987, purchased MC2120........... $795
11-28-1987, purchased MC2120 panel, 045-022.. $ 41.34
12-19-1987, traded-in.. MC2120.......... ($795)
12-19-1987, purchased MC2200........... $950
06-12-1989, traded-in.. MC2200.......... ($800)
06-12-1989, purchased MC2205........... $1100

The only upgrade after the MC2205 was the Thiel 3.5 speakers on 12-08-2007 some 18-1/2 years later. As already stated the 2205 is one `wicked powerful´ amplifier. The 2255 was a big jump in price and I wasn't too keen on the diagnostics circuitry. I also regret peddling the 2200 now.

Let's not forget this discussion is about the 2505, which I purchased 8-21-1989 for $350 from EZ in Chicago.

-Gregory

Last edited by Gregory; 06-08-2009 at 07:58 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-25-2008, 02:53 PM
onemug's Avatar
onemug onemug is offline
Wanna play?
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,010
"Let's not forget this discussion is about the 2505,"

Yes, apologies to Nikko75. Should have used the PM feature.

Best way for me to describe the 2505 is "non fatiguing" and as a tip for anyone buying one: Have it packed to the nth degree. The glass can break real easy during the shipping. The 250 is the same amp, cheaper and no glass to break if you are just looking for the sound.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-27-2008, 06:15 PM
musicmessiah's Avatar
musicmessiah musicmessiah is offline
AK Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 106
My MC2505 is my first Mc piece and puts out 70 watts of beautiful music in my den. It may be the baby boomer in the family but it's aged gracefully IMO. Unfortunately it's now back at AC being serviced and is truly missed at the moment.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-28-2008, 08:57 AM
painterman's Avatar
painterman painterman is offline
AK Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 38
From MC225 to MC2505

I recently swapped my MC225 with an MC2505, on loan from my Dad. He bought it new in 1969 and it's been in use ever since. As compared to the 225, I've only had it for a few days, and it does have a similar sound as I understand it was voiced to do so. One difference I have noticed is that the extra power seems to drive my Sonus Faber Concertino speakers a bit better, and does benefit the phono section, which has a slightly fuller sound than with the 225. Both are paired with an MX 110 brought to spec and anyway, they all sound great.
Good luck with your 2505.
__________________
MX 110/MC 225/SF Concertino
Reply With Quote
Audiokarma
  #11  
Old 05-28-2008, 09:10 AM
Gaucho1's Avatar
Gaucho1 Gaucho1 is offline
AK Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 521
My two Mc Vintage amps are a 5100 integrated and a MC2105 both from the same era as the 2505. If 50 watts is all you need, I'm sure it will sound beautiful. When I got my 5100 back from Terry Dewick, I was astonished at the quality of sound coming from my rather inexpensive Infinity speakers that I had connected to it. The imaging was unexpected and quite startling.
__________________
C500T - MC252 X 2 Bridged Mono - Sonus Faber Cremona Auditors - KABUSA Technics SL1210M5G - PS Audio Digital Link III - Mac Mini Server
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:49 PM.



Friends of Audiokarma
We appreciate your help in keeping this site going.
Stereo Repair World
Herbies Audio Lab
Vintage Home Audio
Amps and Sound
Pro DJ Headphones - click here
Organ Donor Parts
Wargos Electronics
Parts Connexion
Sonneteer
Take Five Audio
Sound Stage Direct
Audio Salon
AudioClassics
Audience AV
AV Solutions
Simply Speakers
Tone Arm Audio
BD Enterprise
Musical Paradise
Howard Products
Classic Sound Repair
FM DX Antenna
McIntosh Cabinets
Siliconray
BOI Audio Works
Vinyl Magic Record Cleaner
Amplifiedparts
Grant Fidelity
RSL Speakers
Yesterday's Audio
Urban Antigue Radio
DeWick Repairs
Many Moons Audio
Vintage Electronics Repair
The Tube Store
Politicalchat.org
Audio Doctor
Antique Radio Classifieds
MCM Electronics
Videokarma.org
   
   
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©Copyright 2002-2014 AudioKarma.org, All rights reserved.