• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Long awaited addition: Technics RS-9900

SaSi

Seriously Illogical
I am a fan of the Technics systems of the late '70 era. I've been looking for this deck and here it came now.

It has a few bruises but all cables are there and it works fine. It needed new belts for the spools (FF was marginal and REW just wasn't there). And a good cleaning. The pictures of the area around the heads are revealing.

The deck already has new belts and is already playing fine and winding fine. Azimuth was really off (thankfully as the previous owner thought it wasn't good any more).

I cleaned the basic parts of the transport around the cassette compartment. Lot's of dust inside. Same as the M85 from the same era. I will eventually want to make a better cleaning inside. And by the way, it shares several mechanical components with the RS 673 and more with the 671. It's nice that I once got 2 RS673 for 5 euro each.

In terms of specs, it's 3 heads (with discrete rec/play heads and a tiny erase head on the left of the left pinch roller), dual capstan and 3 motors. The reels are belt driven with a motor each. The capstan motor is direct driving the take up shaft and belt driving the supply side. An extra belt is magnetically measuring the rotation speed of the take up reel and converts that into remaining time on a separate VU meter style display. Looks cool but the real time counter on the RS-1500 is better.

Impressions?
Mixed. As it was and still is one of my dream machines, I am a happy owner. It sounds good and records well as well. It looks and feels huge and solid. Larger than two heavyweight amps stacked together.

Internally, comparing it with, say, a Revox B710, the Revox wins hands down. The transport on the Technics feels flimsy compared to the Revox. And although the B710 most likely has more PCB surface, the nice modular slotted arrangement makes for a neater deck.

But what I really like on this deck is that it's a snapshot of a design era that is gone and will never come back again.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_37287s.jpg
    IMG_37287s.jpg
    80.7 KB · Views: 808
  • IMG_37286s.jpg
    IMG_37286s.jpg
    102.8 KB · Views: 299
  • IMG_37269s.jpg
    IMG_37269s.jpg
    69.3 KB · Views: 229
  • IMG_37260.JPG
    IMG_37260.JPG
    104.9 KB · Views: 226
  • IMG_37265.jpg
    IMG_37265.jpg
    89.3 KB · Views: 255
Register to hide this ad
OK, now I'm beginning to dislike you, SaSi. :grumpy:

But I'll muddle through with 2 Revox B-215's I just bought. :banana:

Man, that deck would look reel nice next to my RS-1500..... :drool:

You lucky SOB. :thmbsp:
 
I do love that Technics series of gear. I've had the tuner (the big one, dont remember the model nr), and the Elcaset deck. How I'd love to have that entire series! One has to make choices though ;)

Do you plan to get an entire set-up from this Technics series?
 
I do love that Technics series of gear. I've had the tuner (the big one, dont remember the model nr), and the Elcaset deck. How I'd love to have that entire series! One has to make choices though ;)

Do you plan to get an entire set-up from this Technics series?
The tuner you refer to must be the ST-9600.

One thing brings another and it never stops. A friend of a friend heard about my collection addiction of lately and this deck in particular and suggested I take a look at another friend's old system. He said there was a Technics TT, Preamp, some amps, some "filter or something" and a tuner. He described from memory from when they would listen to the system at his friend's house when they were at high school. This set's the timeline to '78-79, which is good. The possibility of "a few amps" really makes it interesting for my active speaker project for next year.

I am guessing it is from the 9xxx series, so I said I'm interested if the condition is ok and the price right. They are still searching to find in which corner of the basement "this old stuff is stored".

So yes, I will probably end up with the complete system, one way or another. I don't think I have the mental strength to avoid it.

BTW, I still have the full set of sales brochures for the 9010, 9020, 9030, 9060, 9060 series somewhere. It's all I could get my hands on back in the day attending HiFi shows.
 
Yes, it was the ST-9600.

So i'm thinking this is what you'll be getting coon:
2509_item_pict_big_technics_rack_b_1.jpg


but with a higher-end cassette deck ;)

EDIT:http://wegavision.pytalhost.com/technics77/ is the actual full '77 line-up. Imagine those Pre/power amps, your cassette deck, the Elcaset, the reel to reel, and those monster-speakers (and maybe some of those EQ's). Now that would be one hell of an TOTL setup!
 
Nice rack!
I've done some research and realize that the 9600 pre and power amps are "lesser" than the newer 9070 and 9060 counterparts. The specs of the 9070 are better than the 9600, although the big amp is 120w while the 9060 is "only" 70 or so. And lacks the VU meters, for which Technics brought out a separate unit for just that.

It appears I am not that far away from the complete series. I already have a black SL-1510, two R2R (1500 & 1506), the 9900 and 3 (no less) RS-673. I think a complete system should have two cassette decks and two R2R, otherwise how can anyone dub a tape?

So, for a "basic complete" system, I'm lacking the pre and poweramp and for a complete system I also need a tuner and equalizer.

And I was thinking that the Behringer 30+ zone equalizers were fine.

Let's not get carried away though. We are talking tape here.
 
Something I just had to share with you. The inevitable comment from my wife for this deck.

Wife: What is this?
SaSi: That's a cassette deck.
Wife: No, that's two cassette decks.
SaSi: No, that is a cassette deck in two halves. First half for the cassette, second half for electronics.
Wife: OK, why did Technics not manage to fit everything in one single box? We have here another box from the same company fitting two cassette decks, not one (showing an RS-TR575), and it is lighter and it doesn't need these handles and the remote control works with that.
...
Can't really argue with her so I decide to try a metaphore
...
SaSi: Remember those old days when cars were much bigger and heavier and slower? Don't you like those cars better than the new tiny tinboxes?
Wife: OK, so long as you don't start bringing cars in the house...
 
imagine the joy a tapedeck like that would be in 1978
shure a big one and it still works can´t say on many revox without service
 
Hi, I have this deck as well, but I don't have the cable that connects the two units together. You said that you have all the cables. Can you tell me anything about how they are connected. Is it just the one cable? Can I buy it somewhere or have someone make one, or am I sol? I totally don't understand the plug on the back.

It's nice to see someone with this deck and people who know something about the Technics rackmount series. It's hard to talk about this stuff with people without the inevitable "Technics sucks" attitudes.
 
Nice rack!
I've done some research and realize that the 9600 pre and power amps are "lesser" than the newer 9070 and 9060 counterparts. The specs of the 9070 are better than the 9600, although the big amp is 120w while the 9060 is "only" 70 or so. And lacks the VU meters, for which Technics brought out a separate unit for just that.

It appears I am not that far away from the complete series. I already have a black SL-1510, two R2R (1500 & 1506), the 9900 and 3 (no less) RS-673. I think a complete system should have two cassette decks and two R2R, otherwise how can anyone dub a tape?

So, for a "basic complete" system, I'm lacking the pre and poweramp and for a complete system I also need a tuner and equalizer.

And I was thinking that the Behringer 30+ zone equalizers were fine.

Let's not get carried away though. We are talking tape here.

I have both the SE-9600 and the SE9060 power amps.
They are both excellent sounding.
The FTC Rule power rating of the 9600 is 110w full bandwidth at .002THD
The SE9060 is like you say, 70 WPC.
The main difference is the headroom is greater with the SE-9600.
It's way overbuilt, as is the 9060. I can't say one sounds better than the other. Both are distortion free, neutral sounding and quiet.
 
Hi, I have this deck as well, but I don't have the cable that connects the two units together. You said that you have all the cables. Can you tell me anything about how they are connected. Is it just the one cable? Can I buy it somewhere or have someone make one, or am I sol? I totally don't understand the plug on the back.

It's nice to see someone with this deck and people who know something about the Technics rackmount series. It's hard to talk about this stuff with people without the inevitable "Technics sucks" attitudes.

You need two cables to connect the two units together. One is a "DIN" like cable with 6 pins (IIRC) - just check the sockets in the back of the machines - and another cable that has 3 rows of pins.

You could modify a DIN cable to include the center pin and I think I've seen such plugs although they may be more common in Europe than they are elsewhere.

The large three row plugs are totaly proprietary to Technics and this deck. Never seen them elsewhere. If you feel handy with the soldering iron, you could perhaps improvise and use a small PCB to which you could attach pins to fit the socket. It's certainly a tedious job but seems to me it's doable.
 
Congratulations SaSi, nice deck! I will soon that kind o wife talk, when my 2 ne Studers A80 arrive - she knows that they are on their way but assumes they are like the PR99...
Cheers
 
Those pinchrollers look pretty shiny, you had better replace them. The condition is critical on a dual capstan machine, and is probably responsible for the alignment issues. Unless the previous owner mucked with the alignment, why would it change?
Really nice looking deck. Is it difficult to get to the heads to clean them? I always found the front access, horizontal mechanism decks (notably Kenwood and Marantz) to be a real SOB to clean.
 
Those pinchrollers look pretty shiny, you had better replace them. The condition is critical on a dual capstan machine, and is probably responsible for the alignment issues. Unless the previous owner mucked with the alignment, why would it change?
Really nice looking deck. Is it difficult to get to the heads to clean them? I always found the front access, horizontal mechanism decks (notably Kenwood and Marantz) to be a real SOB to clean.

IIRC those pinch rollers are in better shape than the picture shows. In a couple of weeks I will be able to get the deck out of storage and set up the listening room system. I will give it a good clean and an overhaul then.

There's a plastic cover over the heads and the compartment cover gives enough clearance for a swab to reach the heads. Furthermore, the top cover of the cassette compartment is a mirror and there's also some light bulbs above so visibility is good.
 
hi, i keep coming back here to see that monster... i've been fantasizing about it for a while and now i finally can get one at "reasonable price" (whatever it means...).
i own a 9600 and will get a 9030 pretty soon so you understand the craving...
but these tape decks are such sorrow-machines, i still have second thoughts... it's supposedly playin nicely but i fear service will be a nightmare when times come, and they always come... i know i will regret it if i let it pass but still... whatever, i just felt like sharing :)
 

Attachments

  • 9900.jpg
    9900.jpg
    35 KB · Views: 36
Back
Top Bottom