The 18/19 once properly restored displaced all the receivers, separates and some of the tube gear in my house. I hear comments like harsh…no. But until restoration there can be issues. And it takes a tech with a distortion analyzer to properly service a 19. Don’t just send it to any tech on Facebook advertising they’ll restore your 19. Some of them won’t attempt it anyways due to the point to point construction (more so on the 18) and lack of screen printed boards. I could go on and on but you just have to hear it to believe. 18 is more solid midrange sound and punchy, 19 is more defined and clean.I know this is a "troll" statement, but in the big picture of Marantz's history the 18 & 19 are not the pinnacle of this companys legacy. Yes they were made to a high standard. Designed and built with exceptionally quality of that time. But that time was the mid 60's. Technology, manufacturing process, material sciences, better understanding of the power supply circuits and the availablity of better cheaper parts eventually produced some of Marantz's prized pieces.
Having had a large number of Marantz's gear over the years. The 18 & 19 fits nicely in a nostalgic niche. And yes, are deserving of restoration and collecting. Much like the 3300 / 250 is an excellent example of mid 70's production, so are the 1x receivers an excellent example of the mid 60's.
charles
My Marantz Model 50 displaced ALL my gear. Tubes and all.The 18/19 once properly restored displaced all the receivers, separates and some of the tube gear in my house. I hear comments like harsh…no. But until restoration there can be issues. And it takes a tech with a distortion analyzer to properly service a 19. Don’t just send it to any tech on Facebook advertising they’ll restore your 19. Some of them won’t attempt it anyways due to the point to point construction (more so on the 18) and lack of screen printed boards. I could go on and on but you just have to hear it to believe. 18 is more solid midrange sound and punchy, 19 is more defined and clean.