• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Collection of various RCM machines and methods videos

Register to hide this ad
Man, ain't those Hannl's just beautiful! Truly works of art, in which many high end Turntables don't look as good! Of course that level of build quality comes at a price. Mark
 
The sixth video you posted - man this guy really takes it to another level! And what's that static thing he uses after he's all done? You guys recommend that?
 
THIS is what he was using in the video I linked to above (originally posted by chadnliz). Man, another 400+ beans to remove static?
 
If you look closely at that video, the record starts out spinning true. As soon as he begins to apply the steam, note the warpage that is occuring to the record! Most of that warpage may be temporary, but some residual warpage may remain. Not to mention what possible damage that heat may cause to the groove itself?

Using good cleaners, and rinses one should never need to resort to steam. IMO this is a real fubar for record cleaning, and I suggest avoiding the temptation like the plague. Mark
 
If you look closely at that video, the record starts out spinning true. As soon as he begins to apply the steam, note the warpage that is occuring to the record! Most of that warpage may be temporary, but some residual warpage may remain. Not to mention what possible damage that heat may cause to the groove itself?


I noticed that too! I had to replay it just to be sure. There's no way in hell I'd do that to a record. It looks like it flattens back out, but how close does it come to its original dimensions? Wonder what the steam does to the label? That's just taking it too far. The records I wash in the sink sound great.
 
Yeah, its not the steam method I'm talking about though. The reason I mentioned that video is because he says (near the end of the video) that anyone who uses a RCM will get static build up. At the very end he uses the FURU-DESTAT that I linked to above. Anyone ever use one? Any other simple (less expensive) ways to reduce static from using a RCM?
 
Some use a Milty ZeroStat gun for like $80, thats why on dry cycle you should try to keep it to 2 revolutions.
 
Thanks for posting!

I like how guy #6 had a second vac wand for the 2nd rinse cycle> I like his thinking. Don't think I'll get a steamer any time soon though. Guy #5 was a classic.

I've been recently thinking that there needs to be a record cleaning sticky thread with all the various methods. Any thread regarding this topic always gets many different responses. I feel for the newbies that come home with some secondhand vinyl dying to give it a spin on their new TT only to be disappointed by the surface noise. It's great that they can start with a simple and effective "sink" method that won't cost them a cent and slowly move up in their technique. Not saying that sink methods are the best but they are better than not doing anything at all.

Here's some pics of my current method. It started with sink and has progressed over the year thanks to this site. Hand spin, Disc Doctor brushes, home brew isopropyl mix, demineralised water and vacuuming with microfibre towel over the nossel. Second pic is the new inner and outers getting changed out. Third is dirt on a towel from a record that had already been "sink" washed but "scrubbed" with a solution then vacuumed.

I like the hand spin method for two reasons. 1) I'm on solar power and the 1100W alone from the vac is luxury enough. 2) I can focus more on the dirtier spots and have free movement with speed and backwards to forwards motion. The whole kit is a fairly easy set up and pack down. I find it more practical than sink as I don't need to wash the dishes before I wash records!

Eventually I'd like the components in a more compact unit like the other DIY RCMs out there, but for the time being this has been an easy way to knock over 10 or 12 records on a Sunday afternoon.
 

Attachments

  • RCM 008.jpg
    RCM 008.jpg
    86.4 KB · Views: 119
  • RCM 010.jpg
    RCM 010.jpg
    62.1 KB · Views: 113
  • RCM 012.jpg
    RCM 012.jpg
    30.5 KB · Views: 100
Last edited:
Lee, that scene looks awfully familiar! What are the various fluids you've got? Is that dark red one part of the process, too? :D
 
Lee, that scene looks awfully familiar! What are the various fluids you've got? Is that dark red one part of the process, too? :D

That red one is a special fluid needed for best record cleaning results. Like most of my solutions I find it more cost effective to purchase in the bulk 4L cardboard box. Known locally as "goon" it can be found at most fluid retailers.
 
Thanks for posting!

I like how guy #6 had a second vac wand for the 2nd rinse cycle> I like his thinking. Don't think I'll get a steamer any time soon though. Guy #5 was a classic.

I've been recently thinking that there needs to be a record cleaning sticky thread with all the various methods. Any thread regarding this topic always gets many different responses. I feel for the newbies that come home with some secondhand vinyl dying to give it a spin on their new TT only to be disappointed by the surface noise. It's great that they can start with a simple and effective "sink" method that won't cost them a cent and slowly move up in their technique. Not saying that sink methods are the best but they are better than not doing anything at all.

Here's some pics of my current method. It started with sink and has progressed over the year thanks to this site. Hand spin, Disc Doctor brushes, home brew isopropyl mix, demineralised water and vacuuming with microfibre towel over the nossel. Second pic is the new inner and outers getting changed out. Third is dirt on a towel from a record that had already been "sink" washed but "scrubbed" with a solution then vacuumed.

I like the hand spin method for two reasons. 1) I'm on solar power and the 1100W alone from the vac is luxury enough. 2) I can focus more on the dirtier spots and have free movement with speed and backwards to forwards motion. The whole kit is a fairly easy set up and pack down. I find it more practical than sink as I don't need to wash the dishes before I wash records!

Eventually I'd like the components in a more compact unit like the other DIY RCMs out there, but for the time being this has been an easy way to knock over 10 or 12 records on a Sunday afternoon.

I like the proximity of the cigarettes to the Costco sized bottle of rubbing alcohol! :nono:

Edit- While drinking a Costco sized glass of wine!
 
having wanted a real store bought machine vs my hand spinner , shop vac hand held wand hodge podge unit I think I will stay with mine . I can get way better scrubbing in both directions and can spend as much time as I want or don't want on cleaning a side . If I could put the shopvac in another room I would be very happy as it howls , but other than that I think the manual method can give better results . Now the loricraft or monks look to be a different breed ?
Just my 2 cents .
thanks for the time to link all those vids .
 
having wanted a real store bought machine vs my hand spinner , shop vac hand held wand hodge podge unit I think I will stay with mine . I can get way better scrubbing in both directions and can spend as much time as I want or don't want on cleaning a side . If I could put the shopvac in another room I would be very happy as it howls , but other than that I think the manual method can give better results . Now the loricraft or monks look to be a different breed ?
Just my 2 cents .
thanks for the time to link all those vids .

You've sort of lost me here? "You can get way better scrubbing in both directions and spend as much as you want, and the manual method can give better results", versus what other method are you referring to here?

There's too many videos here in this thread to know what you are referring to?

Before I comment any further, I'll await your answers. Mark
 
You've sort of lost me here? "You can get way better scrubbing in both directions and spend as much as you want, and the manual method can give better results", versus what other method are you referring to here?

There's too many videos here in this thread to know what you are referring to?

Before I comment any further, I'll await your answers. Mark

Yeah not to clear I guess ? It seems that most of the auto units just have the brush sit there as the record spins in the cleaning cycle . I think I can get better results with holding my brush and changing the angle or pressure etc . I can go back and forth over an area numerous times if I think it will help . Does it help ? Well maybe , maybe not . Not owing a VPI or other I can't say , but I am sure that my hand spinner must work at least as good as the auto machines . I use a VPI brush at the moment and Nitty Gritty pads on the 2 wands . Again all manual , would be nice to have motor drive on the vacum cycle at least as that is dead simple and doesn't seem to require any human intervention . But it's what I have and seeing the VPI in action , and some of the others , I am actually pretty happy with my rig .
 
Hello ARJohn, with a machine such as the relatively simple VPI 16.5, you can do all those things too. Perhaps in the other current VPI thread, this wasnt explained clearly enough?

The way we've seen these machines used in these videos, is they apply fluids, lazily hold the brush in one place upon the record, then continue to let the platter spin. Then vacuum.

This is not the method I use, and concur with your methods as a better way.
I'll apply fluids, insure I have completely covered every last square millimeter from the edge of record, right to the label area, without wetting the label.

Once this is done, I then shut the Platter motor off. I let the fluids sit, to do their job. Then with one hand on the platter switch, and one hand on a Mobile Fidelity Brush Pad, I begin a gentle scrub routine. I'll gently scrub in both directions, back, and forth carefully following the groove, do this 6-8 times to about a 1/4th of the record, then momentarily hit the Platter Motor Switch, rotate the record into a new position, and continue on until the entire record has been scrubbed.

Then the fluids are removed by vacuum. It is easier done than said.

Now with machines like the VPI 17F, and VPI Typhoon, these have a Cleaning Fluid Resovoir, with a Pump, and a Deck Mounted Scrubbing Brush. These machines have reversible Platter Motors, so one can pump fluids onto the record to their heart's content, and scrub back and forth all day if you want, with a simple flip of the Platter switch.

The one downside with these, the resovoir only holds one type of fluid, so if you prefer using a multi-step cleaning process, and then a final rinse, one still needs to resort to seperate bottles-holding vessels for these additional liquids. Hope this all makes sense. Mark
 
Last edited:
Hello ARJohn, with a machine such as the relatively simple VPI 16.5, you can do all those things too. Perhaps in the other current VPI thread, this wasnt explained clearly enough?

The way we've seen these machines used in these videos, is they apply fluids, lazily hold the brush in one place upon the record, then continue to let the platter spin. Then vacuum.

This is not the method I use, and concur with your methods as a better way.
I'll apply fluids, insure I have completely covered every last square millimeter from the edge of record, right to the label area, without wetting the label.

Once this is done, I then shut the Platter motor off. I let the fluids sit, to do their job. Then with one hand on the platter switch, and one hand on a Mobile Fidelity Brush Pad, I begin a gentle scrub routine. I'll gently scrub in both directions, back, and forth carefully following the groove, do this 6-8 times to about a 1/4th of the record, then momentarily hit the Platter Motor Switch, rotate the record into a new position, and continue on until the entire record has been scrubbed.

Then the fluids are removed by vacuum. It is easier done than said.

Now with machines like the VPI 17F, and VPI Typhoon, these have a Cleaning Fluid Resovoir, with a Pump, and a Deck Mounted Scrubbing Brush. These machines have reversible Platter Motors, so one can pump fluids onto the record to their heart's content, and scrub back and forth all day if you want, with a simple flip of the Platter switch.

The one downside with these, the resovoir only holds one type of fluid, so if you prefer using a multi-step cleaning process, and then a final rinse, one still needs to resort to seperate bottles-holding vessels for these additional liquids. Hope this all makes sense. Mark

Yeah I guess videos show the quick method for posting maybe , like you say, the soak I think is an important step that yields great results and the ability to scrub as you describe. So a semi auto machine would be the way to go , with manual fluid application and a quiet vacum , now we are talking .
here's my rig , I use a paint pad for spreading the rinse water until I come up with something better .
 

Attachments

  • Picture 017 (Medium).jpg
    Picture 017 (Medium).jpg
    78.7 KB · Views: 34
I like the proximity of the cigarettes to the Costco sized bottle of rubbing alcohol! :nono:

Edit- While drinking a Costco sized glass of wine!

Yes, my bad..."I just placed it there briefly for the photo honest officer!"

But in all seriousness this is a good pick up. This 100% stuff had to be shipped as a "dangerous good".

I keep mine down to a diluted 250mL spray bottle that I pour and spray with depending on the need. I started by having it in an open container like the distilled water but I found the it evaporated so quickly that by the time I was washing record five it had become half strength.
 
Yes, my bad..."I just placed it there briefly for the photo honest officer!"

But in all seriousness this is a good pick up. This 100% stuff had to be shipped as a "dangerous good".

I keep mine down to a diluted 250mL spray bottle that I pour and spray with depending on the need. I started by having it in an open container like the distilled water but I found the it evaporated so quickly that by the time I was washing record five it had become half strength.

That's a good idea. I generally mix a 3:1 Distilled H2O/IPA/Dawn solution in a rinse/scrub tub and work from there but I did notice, using the 100% IPA (pharmacy) in the winter (= closed windows) led to very stingy eyes. I never thought about the evaporation.
 
Back
Top Bottom