![]() |
|
||||||||
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Sketchup is better than you guys are giving it credit for. It's absolutely not a replacement for AutoCAD or Revit and it doesn't pretend to be. You have to think in 3 dimensions, and you have to think about the level of detail that's useful for modeling a listening space. I'm not talking about modeling in the sense that it performs an acoustical analysis, only in the sense that it allows you to convey the physical realities of your listening space to others perfectly. But that doesn't mean that it will never be able to do acoustics analysis. Do a search for ray-tracing plugins and you might find yourself surprised at its spacial modeling capabilities. I've not found an acoustic ray-trace plugin, but that just means no one has written one yet. The ability to assign material properties to surfaces is built in and it uses Ruby to run scripts, which is the most user-friendly language known to man. Writing an acoustic ray-trace plugin will be far, far easier than writing a LISP routine to accomplish the same thing in AutoCAD. Actually, now that I think about it, there is a new sketchup-based product on the market for outdoor noise analysis called Olive Tree Lab. The author posted the beta version in an acoustics group on Linked-In and I tried it out a few months ago. It seemed promising. It was a little rough, but I think he's made some refinements since then (and started charging for it). That software isn't useful for audiophiles, since our problems are single room, indoor, but it illustrates very nicely that Sketchup can be an excellent platform for acoustical analysis. Quote:
I guess it would be cool for a mono system, but this would absolutely wreck a stereo image. It'd sure be loud, though! Here's me in Seattle in front of the children's museum. They have a set of "whisper dishes" set up, which are a blast to play with. There's a little iron ring on each dish which shows you where the focal point is. One person stands at each dish with their heads near the rings and you can hear each other whispering clearly across the courtyard.
|
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
No doubt, canyon carving' in the 70's on street tires was very, um...harcore. I gotta know, were you pumpin any tunes during those twisty two-lane assaults and if so, what/who put in the zone? Sorry I'm off topic guys, but this is pretty radical stuff for a car guy. I gotta' ask. |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ok, no concave walls.
I was just thinking of how great the little fiberglass round dome house a friend rented and how the accustics in there sounded with a little stereo back in the '70's. I guess I can't remember how Sketch worked except that I couldn't do anything with it, and wondered how people were drawing such unbelievably good car drawings with itThat car is so loud that you couldn't hear the 7 watt cassette deck anyways, but it was Led Zepplin and Pink Floyd.
__________________
Last edited by VolvoHeretic; 09-22-2011 at 12:21 PM. |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
A casette deck in your car in the 70's. You must've gotten all the chicks with that thing! Too cool, man....too cool.
|
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Think in three dimensions? AutoCAD and Revit are both extremely capable 3D modeling applications. I think it's safe to say we're all thinking in three dimensions here. You keep referring to "modeling" a listening room, but if you read the first post of this thread you will realize that what the OP is actually looking for is analysis, not modeling. In post #5 you can see that he has already modeled his room in AutoCAD. How can Sketchup possibly improve upon what he has already done? Sketchup's forte is rendering, and even in that tiny area ACAD is far superior. Quote:
Analysis with a LISP routine? I've written a lot of LISP routines for myriad situations and the idea of performing acoustic analysis with one is ridiculous to me. I'm not saying it's impossible, but way, WAY outside anything I've ever seen done with LISP. Quote:
|
| Audiokarma |
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
This is the original request: Quote:
This is why I suggested modeling his room in Sketchup, because a Sketchup model would transmit the same information to us in a format that would be useful to any of us, not just those of us with AutoCAD. I'm not suggesting that he re-model his room, btw. In his first post he said that he could model it in AutoCAD, not that he had. The motivation for touting the use of Sketchup for us in this forum to communicate our rooms to one another comes from experience. I do acoustical engineering analysis on a daily basis and I've found Sketchup to be more useful than AutoCAD for many tasks. Of course we have AutoCAD at our firm, but I actually don't use it very often (only to read client drawings). When we make recommendations for acoustical treatment or mitigation, the important parts of what we're telling a client, what to do and why to do it, can easily get lost in an AutoCAD drawing. In Sketchup I can de-emphasize absolute dimensions and emphasize the principals at work. I don't actually send Sketchup models to clients, but I sometimes take snapshots from inside a model to insert as figures into a report, and they usually do a great job of getting the point across. I'm really not the first to think of this use for Sketchup, not by a long shot. If you want an example of how Sketchup can be useful for a forum like ours, spend a little time checking out the models people have built at the John Sayers forum. They've been using it for years there to help one another do great acoustics. |
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I agree that this is the root of our disagreement. I also agree that Sketchup can be used to aid in visualization, but I see that as being an extremely primitive form of acoustical analysis. So, if the OP walked into your firm, how would you use Sketchup to dissuade him from the curved back wall idea? Or better yet, how could HE use Sketchup to determine the viability (or lack thereof) of his curved wall idea? He already knows how to use AutoCAD, so the learning curve point is moot. Sent from my BlackBerry 9800 using Tapatalk |
|
#23
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
But to answer your question, I would use Sketchup, AutoCAD, or a sheet of paper in the same way to dissuade him from using a curved back wall. It's not a very complicated concept, so it really doesn't require software to communicate it. I would draw lines showing how an inwardly curved back wall would focus reflections to the center of the room, thereby allowing both speakers to "exist" on both sides of the room simultaneously, wrecking the stereo image. Quote:
Quote:
The most important room acoustics programs I know of are CATT, ODEON, and EASE. Is it one of these? There are some other packages out there that aren't as popular, as well. I haven't used CATT, but I have used both EASE and ODEON. All 3 of them can work with Sketchup models, by the way. And a lot of people prefer Sketchup to any other interface for modeling a room. Like I said before, Skeptchup's level of detail is very consistent with the level of detail needed to do acoustical analysis. ODEON: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Axys DDA: Quote:
L-Acoustics Soundvision: Quote:
And hey, look what I found: http://forums.sketchucation.com/view...df6b4ba80cf1bc. Sketchup plugin for acoustic ray-trace. I don't know how well it works but maybe it's useful for us. |
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ok, I don't want to beat a dead horse here, as it's obvious we are talking about two different things, but what I see above is this: You've listed a bunch of programs that WILL perform the task at hand (acoustic analysis), and illustrated the fact that they are all compatible with Sketchup in some capacity. You've proposed the idea that someone trained in acoustics could use Sketchup alone to perform basic raytracing, but that the same person could also use a pencil and a sheet of paper to the same end... Which pretty much echos what I've been trying to say in the last several posts: Sketchup is not the right tool for performing any kind of acoustical analysis, even if the analysis required is so basic as to solely require simple raytracing. (Because even then, someone like yourself would have to provide the knowledge to do the raytracing properly and to then draw intelligent conclusions from the resulting data.)
I still don't see how it will help a guy trying to figure out the effects of a curved back wall on overall sound or where to place his chair to avoid standing waves... Maybe the OP can chime in here to clarify the original question. Specifically, what he meant by "sound modeling". |
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Both AutoCAD and Sketchup models of his room would be helpful, because both would enable us to quickly extract distances between meaningful locations with a few clicks of the mouse. This is why I suggested he consider creating a Sketchup model instead, as it would be a quick and convenient way for him to transmit all of the room's dimensions in one model that anyone here could download and observe, not just those of us with access to AutoCAD. His second question, later in the thread, was about having a concave surface. It's a great question to ask on a forum like this, because I'm sure there are at least half a dozen people here who would instantly know not to do that. Problem solved. It does not require any software to determine that a concave curved surface in a critical listening room is a bad idea. We don't even need room dimensions. Running a ray-trace on a room with a curved wall would reveal to us the location of the focal point, which I guess could be interesting, but it's not useful information in terms of answering the question. Knowing that there will be a focal point is all that's important. Quote:
What I have been saying, over and over and over, is that Sketchup is a great tool for creating a model that can be transmitted to anyone. Such a model can inform someone of room dimensions for doing a hand calculation, or it can be imported into all of the major room acoustics software packages. And that is the is the original intent of this thread. Quote:
It is also true that a Sketchup model could be used for the exact same task and, in fact, would be more useful, because it could be transmitted to anyone on the forum who was interested in taking a look. Quote:
|
| Audiokarma |
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks guys. When I first posted, I didn't have a model, but it only took 15 minutes to create and twice that long to upload to the server and post. I was hoping you guys used software that could show all of the sound anomalies similar to that Olive Tree Terrain, but it's just like CFD analysis, everything you find on the internet is stuff for sale, but no one to providing the services, but I haven’t actually looked either.
I will just continue to try and visualize sound without a clue, my best luck so far is to thing of the 2D waves splashing around in a crowded pool and how the waves in the corners build up and splash out. How about convex walls then?
__________________
|
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ugh. How about this: We stop bickering over this stupid software issue and you answer the guy's intensely simple question that apparently only requires room dimensions and a calculator. Ok?
|
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Sorry man, I'm going to stop clogging your thread with BS and maybe someone will hook you up with a quick and dirty analysis. |
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
|
Much better than concave, but really not necessary. It would take up space that you don't have to sacrifice.
So can you give us the basic dimensions of your room and the existing surfaces? I can see from the picture you've posted that it's long and skinny but that's about all I can tell. |
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
|
It's not that long. I just measured it and will post it up when I get a chance. I will also recheck Sketchup and see if it doesn't suck so much this time.
__________________
|
| Audiokarma |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|