Audiokarma.org
Audiokarma Featured Sponsor

Go Back   AudioKarma.org Home Audio Stereo Discussion Forums > Grant Fidelity


We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-12-2011, 06:28 PM
iGrant's Avatar
iGrant iGrant is offline
Grant Fidelity Forum Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,126
Lightbulb TubeDAC-11 Tube Rolling

Hoping owners will share their tube rolling experience with the TubeDAC-11 here and hope you will compare to stock what direction the roll went until you find your reference.

If you haven't tried it yet, check out the DAC Direct out, this is a handy reference for me to keep a handle on detail and balance.

Thanks,
Ian
__________________
www.grantfidelity.com

If in Calgary, please visit our Calgary Showroom and see and hear what we do :)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-31-2011, 11:03 AM
Wolfbane's Avatar
Wolfbane Wolfbane is offline
What's going on?
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 301
I've been a happy DAC-09 owner for nearly a year but became even happier with this DAC when I rolled out the original tube that came with it from GF. In the last year Iève rolled in just about every NOS 396A, 2C51 and 5670 tube into the DAC-09from Western Electric to GE 5 Star to Bendix red label to Raytheon, Tungsol, RCA and GE 'US Army'. Every NOS tube I tried in the DAC-09 was a big improvement over the original, and an instant audio change.

Now, I'm doing a compare of the DAC-09 to the DAC-11 and rolling in some different brand tubes as time allows.

First up after 125 hours on the original tube is a Tesla ECC88. The result ten hours later with this tube: No significant audio difference from the tube that came from the factory! This is a real surprise. I still need more listening time on the Tesla before I move on to another NOS tube. Telefunken, Phillips and Mullard ECC88 tubes to come.

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-04-2011, 12:56 AM
keithpgdrb's Avatar
keithpgdrb keithpgdrb is offline
AK Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bolingbrook, IL
Posts: 1,927
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolfbane View Post
I've been a happy DAC-09 owner for nearly a year but became even happier with this DAC when I rolled out the original tube that came with it from GF. In the last year Iève rolled in just about every NOS 396A, 2C51 and 5670 tube into the DAC-09from Western Electric to GE 5 Star to Bendix red label to Raytheon, Tungsol, RCA and GE 'US Army'. Every NOS tube I tried in the DAC-09 was a big improvement over the original, and an instant audio change.

Now, I'm doing a compare of the DAC-09 to the DAC-11 and rolling in some different brand tubes as time allows.

First up after 125 hours on the original tube is a Tesla ECC88. The result ten hours later with this tube: No significant audio difference from the tube that came from the factory! This is a real surprise. I still need more listening time on the Tesla before I move on to another NOS tube. Telefunken, Phillips and Mullard ECC88 tubes to come.

VERY much looking forward to your further findings. you are clearly well practiced, and have a method!!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-08-2011, 10:16 PM
ssouci's Avatar
ssouci ssouci is offline
AK Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Vancouver, BC, CANADA
Posts: 354
Quote:
"...The result ten hours later with this tube: No significant audio difference from the tube that came from the factory!.."
that seems very odd... all I've ever read is that "the stock Chinese tubes are terrible" on the DAC-09, so figured it would be the same for the DAC-11

why the improvement?

are these better quality tubes that can't really be improved upon? or, is the circuitry/design of the DAC-11 somehow different so that the tube plays a much lesser role? or, is the tube even hooked into the circuit or just there for show and the nice glow!!!???

would love to hear some possible explanations, and of course any further tube rolling results for the DAC-11

thanks!


PS: I'm considering getting a DAC-09 (if I can find one used at a decent price.... no luck so far at all), or perhaps a DAC-11 then?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-08-2011, 10:50 PM
iGrant's Avatar
iGrant iGrant is offline
Grant Fidelity Forum Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,126
I never read where the stock tube in the TubeDAC-09 sounded terrible and for the past nearly 3 years all I have ever run them with is the stock tube, I still have the first one that has been left on almost constantly since day one.

You have to remember that with any piece of tube gear , the stock tube was how it was designed and tested. Rolling of course can bring different flavours and with the 09 only 3 tubes seemed to stand out as being a worthwhile roll and try and get them now for the price they were before they became something to roll in the 09. Hmm, maybe that is why the rollers are being quiet so far, or they are just enjoying the stock tube sound or they haven't got it broken in yet.

I tried all 3 of these tubes in my Rita Reference System (RITA-880, RBS-1, CD-1000 transporting to the TubeDAC-09) and they all sounded great, but the stock Military Grade Shuguang 6N3 tube sounded the way I wanted it to.

Everyone's system and ears are different, so hopefully lots of different suggestions of what tube is great will come, the TubeDAC-11 has multitudes more rolling options that the 09 had, but my guess is that there will only be again a handful of tubes that rollers find hands down beat the stock tube, this time a Military Grade Shuguang 6N11.

Finding a used 09 might not be as easy as one would think, I have suggested to many that for the price, hang onto it, it is a great sounding DAC, if you have the 11, the 09 still has it's magic full tube sound that works great with secondary systems and for many has found a nice home in their main system, especially vintage and all SS systems.

Personally, I'd go for the 11, no contest to my ears in my reference systems.

For those in Calgary, I just found three more 09 demos and one new in the box, drop by the showroom if you want one. Hmm, maybe I should auction off the new one.

Cheers,
Ian
__________________
www.grantfidelity.com

If in Calgary, please visit our Calgary Showroom and see and hear what we do :)
Reply With Quote
Audiokarma
  #6  
Old 11-09-2011, 04:58 PM
Wolfbane's Avatar
Wolfbane Wolfbane is offline
What's going on?
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 301
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssouci View Post

why the improvement?

are these better quality tubes that can't really be improved upon? or, is the circuitry/design of the DAC-11 somehow different so that the tube plays a much lesser role? or, is the tube even hooked into the circuit or just there for show and the nice glow!!!???

would love to hear some possible explanations, and of course any further tube rolling results for the DAC-11
I found an instant audio improvement over the Chinese tube that came with my DAC-09 when I pulled it out and replaced it with a NOS Sylvania. The Sylvania tube I had on hand was the standard 1960's tube and not the Gold Brand. I then rolled that tube out and replaced it with a Western Electric
396A tube which was subsequently replaced with a 5 Star GE (white label), then a GE US Army, then a Gold Brand Sylvania, a Tungsol, a Raytheon a CBS Hytron, RCA, GE 5 Star red label and finally a Bendix 2C51 Red Label US Military. All of the NOS 5670 type tubes were a significant improvement over the original tube. I've got hundreds of hours on the DAC-09 and only 55 hourds on the DAC-11.

The Tesla ECC88 tube is now out and I've (just now) got a NOS Telefunken ECC88 tube in its place now. The DAC-11 audio characteristics was not significantly changed when I put the Tesla in. This does not mean that the stock tube sound is not great but just the opposite - it sounded great with the stock tube. To my ears the DAC-11 is a cleaner, less tubey sounding DAC then the DAC-09 with both the original tube and the Tesla ECC88. Tesla ECC88 tubes came from the factory in my mono-block amps and I replaced these tubes in the mono-blocks with Siemens, then Telefunken ECC88 tubes. Right now I had some gold pin Phillips in these amps and they sound great!

I could live very happily with the DAC-11, as is, right out of the box, i.e. with the stock Chinese tube but I have a good stock of ECC88 and 6DJ8 in several brands and I enjoy listening to the different results I hear with different tubes and... it is fun looking for the Holy Grail of tubes!

Wb
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-10-2011, 04:48 PM
ssouci's Avatar
ssouci ssouci is offline
AK Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Vancouver, BC, CANADA
Posts: 354
Quote:
"To my ears the DAC-11 is a cleaner, less tubey sounding DAC then the DAC-09 with both the original tube"
Wb:
if I'm after a more tubey sound (to tone down digital harshness), then would the 09 be better? or is the 11 still quite tubey and also better overall?

(note: I would be feeding the DAC out of my Oppo 980H DVD player into a SS receiver (Marantz 2275)

thx!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-11-2011, 03:22 AM
keithpgdrb's Avatar
keithpgdrb keithpgdrb is offline
AK Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bolingbrook, IL
Posts: 1,927
I am finding the stock tube to be a "little" light in bass impact and fullness. It sounds great, but I would like to try rolling something in. Having said that, I might be slightly outside the additional 50 hours burn in on the stock tube.

For those of you with lots of rolling experience, suggestions on what might give me a but more on the bottom end? I'm actually pretty pleased with the highs and mids.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-11-2011, 09:18 AM
hibuckhobby's Avatar
hibuckhobby hibuckhobby is offline
AK Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Maple Grove, Minnesota
Posts: 529
while not a DAC...I just tried some vintage RCA cleartops in my GF 2A3 integrated and went back to the stock Shuguang 12AU7's...far more bass weight and a more balanced midrange.
__________________
Emotiva xda-1, a-100, modified Touch, F125 Fonken, Bottlehead Sex, HE500 phones
Marantz PM-11 S1, Marantz 15s1, Rega P25 w/AT440ml, Denon DP61F w/D103, ACI Jag. 2000LFM's
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-11-2011, 05:33 PM
Wolfbane's Avatar
Wolfbane Wolfbane is offline
What's going on?
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 301
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssouci View Post
Wb:
if I'm after a more tubey sound (to tone down digital harshness), then would the 09 be better? or is the 11 still quite tubey and also better overall?

(note: I would be feeding the DAC out of my Oppo 980H DVD player into a SS receiver (Marantz 2275)

thx!
To my ears the DAC-09 is the more mellow laid back tube sounding of these two DAC's right out of box; better yet with an upgraded NOS tube. If you are looking for a good unit to use to with headphones, even only occasionally, buy the Dac-11. The DAC-11 is more expensive to purchase, but this reflects the fact that it is built with better components and cost quite a bit more to manufacture.

After a few hours into listening to the DAC-11 with a Telefunken ECC88 tube installed I'm (no surprise) happier with what I'm hearing. The change is not as audible to my ears as compared to upgrading the 5670 tube in the DAC-09 but this is the best I've got the DAC-11 sounding so far.

Wb
Reply With Quote
Audiokarma
  #11  
Old 11-14-2011, 05:55 PM
Wolfbane's Avatar
Wolfbane Wolfbane is offline
What's going on?
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 301
After 20 hours with the Telefunken ECC88 I've installed an Amperex ECC88 'pinched waist' gold pin tube. Initial impression of this combination is also very favorable!

Update to follow.

Wb
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-14-2011, 08:25 PM
ssouci's Avatar
ssouci ssouci is offline
AK Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Vancouver, BC, CANADA
Posts: 354
Wb (or anyone):

I'm wondering if using one of these DACs (-11 or -09) will make much of an audible difference in my setup?... is it worth the cost and extra complexity (extra box, wiring, etc.)?... what would be the biggest difference I would notice?

my setup is not high-end (perhaps "mid-fi"?), but last night I was listening to a good recording on CD and man it sounded very nice! I don't have too much to compare it to (except hearing systems at friend's homes, etc. over the years), and I'm not a fanatical audiophile, but I surely can tell if sound is good or bad

my system:
- Oppo 980-H DVD player
- receiver: old Marantz 2275 solid-state (fully recapped/restored)
- speakers: old DCM Timeframe TF-500s (refoamed, recapped)
- basic, thick stranded copper speaker cables


I would be playing standard CDs and feeding the DAC from my DVD player (via digital connection) then connecting to the receiver

any comments or advice greatly appreciated, thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-15-2011, 01:33 PM
GrantFidelity's Avatar
GrantFidelity GrantFidelity is offline
AK Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 304
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssouci View Post
Wb (or anyone):

I'm wondering if using one of these DACs (-11 or -09) will make much of an audible difference in my setup?... is it worth the cost and extra complexity (extra box, wiring, etc.)?... what would be the biggest difference I would notice?

my setup is not high-end (perhaps "mid-fi"?), but last night I was listening to a good recording on CD and man it sounded very nice! I don't have too much to compare it to (except hearing systems at friend's homes, etc. over the years), and I'm not a fanatical audiophile, but I surely can tell if sound is good or bad

my system:
- Oppo 980-H DVD player
- receiver: old Marantz 2275 solid-state (fully recapped/restored)
- speakers: old DCM Timeframe TF-500s (refoamed, recapped)
- basic, thick stranded copper speaker cables


I would be playing standard CDs and feeding the DAC from my DVD player (via digital connection) then connecting to the receiver

any comments or advice greatly appreciated, thanks!
The DAC-11 should improve upon the source - you will bypass the internal DAC in the Oppo to get less jitter, better clarity etc..

We sold many DAC-09 to Oppo DVD owners and they are very happy with the results. DAC-11 is superior on sound quality than the DAC-09 by design.

Hope this helps.
__________________
Grant Fidelity Home Audio
- High End, Not High Priced -
www.grantfidelity.com
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-17-2011, 03:43 PM
keithpgdrb's Avatar
keithpgdrb keithpgdrb is offline
AK Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bolingbrook, IL
Posts: 1,927
^this doesn't really belong in he tube rolling thread. And are you really asking GF who's dac is better? Mabey the mods can move this.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-17-2011, 03:49 PM
iGrant's Avatar
iGrant iGrant is offline
Grant Fidelity Forum Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,126
Quote:
Originally Posted by keithpgdrb View Post
^this doesn't really belong in he tube rolling thread. And are you really asking GF who's dac is better? Mabey the mods can move this.
Moved it to a new thread.

Cheers,
Ian
__________________
www.grantfidelity.com

If in Calgary, please visit our Calgary Showroom and see and hear what we do :)
Reply With Quote
Audiokarma
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:22 AM.



Friends of Audiokarma
We appreciate your help in keeping this site going.
Stereo Repair World
Herbies Audio Lab
Vintage Home Audio
Amps and Sound
Pro DJ Headphones - click here
Organ Donor Parts
Wargos Electronics
Parts Connexion
Sonneteer
Take Five Audio
Sound Stage Direct
Audio Salon
AudioClassics
Audience AV
AV Solutions
Simply Speakers
Tone Arm Audio
BD Enterprise
Musical Paradise
Howard Products
Classic Sound Repair
FM DX Antenna
McIntosh Cabinets
Siliconray
BOI Audio Works
Vinyl Magic Record Cleaner
Amplifiedparts
Grant Fidelity
RSL Speakers
Yesterday's Audio
Urban Antigue Radio
DeWick Repairs
Many Moons Audio
Vintage Electronics Repair
The Tube Store
Politicalchat.org
Audio Doctor
Antique Radio Classifieds
MCM Electronics
Videokarma.org
   
   
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©Copyright 2002-2014 AudioKarma.org, All rights reserved.