• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

AR Cloth Surround Sealant?

Kevin64

Member
I am restoring my AR-2ax and purchased some cloth surround sealant from vintage ar. After a little research I am reading conflicting opinions on this sealing practice. Do not want to ruin these by over doing it.
Please help. Thanks
 
Register to hide this ad
I am restoring my AR-2ax and purchased some cloth surround sealant from vintage ar. After a little research I am reading conflicting opinions on this sealing practice. Do not want to ruin these by over doing it.
Please help. Thanks

Kevin,

Although AR woofers seldom need much in the way of re-sealing, the sealant sold by Vintage AR will not negatively affect compliance. One or two light coats will be fine. The toluene in the product may also serve to rejuvenate the old sealant somewhat.

Roy
 
Thank you for the advice, I will go ahead and give them a coat or two.
I found these that had been sitting in a garage for years. Did not know anything about them, except they looked vintage. Sent a good friend a couple of photos, he replied "Buy Them", so I did. $20.00 for the pair!
At his house we did a quick external clean up and put the power to them. What a disappointment. Did some research on the web and discovered great reviews and decent value.
Thanks to the AK community answering questions for this project. The most important was my first post "Restore or Sell" and the overwhelming response to restore them. That started the process of taking them apart and looking inside where no man has been since 1966 (stamped on the woofers) and that itchy rock wool (which I did reuse). Now with new caps, controls and refinished cabinets they sound amazing!
Thanks again to all the advice from AK members.
 
The AR2ax is on my want list. But I most likely will have to make an ebay purchase to get them, so the price has got to be low in order to pay shipping. Amazing what new caps and a coat of surround sealant will do on the AR's & KLH's. On my first set of KLH 23's I just recapped them initially. Not too exciting results, kinda take it or leave it. It wasn't until I resealed the surrounds that I learned what all the hub bub was about on the 23's. They were a totally different speaker. Enjoy the AR's!
 
I would research very thoroughly the original surround engineering before sealing them. Some speakers were not sealed or selectively sealed to provide "breathability".
The issue is less about compliance and more about what was intended.
 
I would research very thoroughly the original surround engineering before sealing them. Some speakers were not sealed or selectively sealed to provide "breathability".
The issue is less about compliance and more about what was intended.

The AR-2ax was a straight forward acoustic suspension design requiring a sealed cabinet and a very compliant woofer. Much can be learned here:
http://www.classicspeakerpages.net/

Only some versions of the AR-4x were aperiodic in design.

Roy
 
Last edited:
I would research very thoroughly the original surround engineering before sealing them. Some speakers were not sealed or selectively sealed to provide "breathability".
The issue is less about compliance and more about what was intended.

I agree, my Hartke 4-10 bass cabinet one could see right through the surrounds the day I bought it brand new.

I've seen/heard other cabs that people "sealed them properly"
It doesn't sound as good.
 
Breathability and aperiodic are different animals. The former allows for changes in weather (among other things) i.e. barometric pressure, temperature, height above sea level etc.
 
Breathability and aperiodic are different animals. The former allows for changes in weather (among other things) i.e. barometric pressure, temperature, height above sea level etc.

They are not at all different animals...just a matter of degree.
With the exception of the AR-4x, AR models of that era did not use the surrounds for "breathability". Acoustic suspension designs almost always have adequate leakage. It is the reason why the "slow woofer return" push test works to test the seal (as described in Edgar Villchur's patent). The rear label on AR speakers of that era warned of breaking the "acoustic" seal. It is the reason these woofers must be very compliant (very low Fs).

Roy
 
Last edited:
RoyC is correct in that breathability was not provided exclusively by the surrounds in that era). Much was achieved through the porous nature of the of the cone material. Leaky cabinets/driver installs were however a no-no. The early Heathkit AR Speaker kits had stethoscope included in the kit to check for cabinet leaks after assembly.
But we have digressed from the question about doping the outer cone supports (surrounds). My friend bought a pair of AR kits through Allied Electronics back in 68. These proportedly had high threadcount tight weave silk surrounds which were not (and did not entertain) doping (stethoscope included).
Therein lies my caution about doping.
 
My friend bought a pair of AR kits through Allied Electronics back in 68. These proportedly had high threadcount tight weave silk surrounds which were not (and did not entertain) doping (stethoscope included).

They sent a stethoscope with the kit? That is a method to make sure there are NO cabinet leaks.

I have no idea what kit your friend received, but NO original AR cloth surround of the 60's into the early 70's (when foam arrived) was not treated with a butyl or butyl/latex compound. This has been discussed and documented at length in the Classic Speaker Pages forum. The information was provided by Tom Tyson, AR historian, and personal friend of E Villchur, as well as Roy Allison himself (designer of these AR models). This information is the basis upon which Vintage AR's sealant was developed.

Below is a photo of an original, untreated AR surround given to me by Tom Tyson from the mid-60's AR factory. It was a reject, as it was improperly cut, but it is very light and porous. The surrounds were treated after installation.

Roy
 

Attachments

  • AR cloth surround.JPG
    AR cloth surround.JPG
    155.5 KB · Views: 231
They were Heathkit AS 2's (AR2's) licensed by AR. Notice these were bought in mid 59. Yes Stethoscope!
Excellent Speakers.
 
They were Heathkit AS 2's (AR2's) licensed by AR. Notice these were bought in mid 59. Yes Stethoscope!
Excellent Speakers.

Interesting...That was very early in the game. Perhaps it was intended to be airtight without treatment. The stethoscope would have been used to verify an airtight seal, but would not be able to discern a specific degree of breathability.

Whatever was going on in the kits of 1959, I have never seen an AR-2/2a/2ax series speaker without treatment on the cloth surround. The only change was the addition of lampblack to color it somewhere down the line.

At this point the greatest threat to AR (and KLH) woofers related to re-sealing is slathering something on that stiffens and decreases compliance, which will compromise the type of bass response these acoustic suspension speakers are known for....so, possibly for different reasons, we do agree on prudence in the matter. :)

Roy
 
RoyC, I whole heartedly agree. It is unfortunate that in many instances, the laws of science (mostly physics) are arbitrarily applied not considering the constraints of living in a living/breathing earthly enviornment. Perfect acoustic suspension would possibly achievable under perfect conditions. As long as the outer edges and centers of the cones need to be held on the proper axis, trade offs will be necessary.
My (same as you just posted) original post was to have the OP do as much research as possible before sloshing stuff (even the new AR dope) on the surrounds because somebody somewhere said that was what to do.
Enjoyed your input. It is well regarded and informative.
Still looking for a pair of 2's along the roadside since they are old (junk? - unlikely)
John
 
I am not sure exactly where on the speaker I spread this sealant. Is there a diagram or video?

Kevin,

Are you saying you don't know what part of the woofer the surround is, or how to apply the sealant to the surround? I believe the sealant box includes a small brush and instructions.

Roy
 
Roy,
Yes, is the sealant applied from the aluminum rim to the cone? Should it overlap onto the cone? What about the flat center section? Thanks
 
Apply it to the fabric. If a little goes past the edges, it's fine. The factory applications were pretty sloppy.

Here's a pic of 3 KLH's with the sealer on the surrounds, and my AR 4x woofer surround resealed. The KLH's have two coats applied, the AR on very light coat. It really helped the bass response.

 
Back
Top Bottom