Here's an excerpt from
http://www.positive-feedback.com/pfbackissues/0604/pappas.spectron.6n4.html
(Note: John Ulrick is narrating the following)
"As time allowed, I started working on a digital switching amplifier based on my switching amplifier experience at Litton. Later my friend Dr. Jim Henderson, now a physicist at Hughes, joined in on the work. With Jim analyzing and me circuit designing, work progressed. Designing the power switching section with the parts available in the mid ‘70s was a real trick. I used power transistors from TRW which were very expensive. On a good day I could go through $200 worth of them. About a year before the winter CES show in Chicago we naively committed to showing a digital switching amplifier. As the show grew closer, the Infinity gang heard Bose was going to show a switching amplifier. Not wanting to end up second, we pressed on to get a working amplifier ready for the show. For the last three months of October, November and December several people worked straight through, no days off. We spent Christmas morning with our families and met at Infinity in the early afternoon on Christmas day and had the Rose Bowl game on in the lab on New Year’s day.
The first day of the show was about Jan 7th. I had airline tickets to fly to Chicago a couple of days before the show opened, but the amplifier wasn’t working. Finally, the night before the show, the amplifier was working, but the displays were making a ticking sound. Finally we just disconnected them, listened to the amp for about 15 minutes in the sound room and I caught the last flight that would make the show. I was picked up at the airport at 7 a.m. and rushed to the show. With my coat draped over it, I carried the amplifier past the line of press people waiting outside our room to see an amplifier they thought was in that room. We set it up and it worked! The doors opened at 9 a.m. and we showed the first digital switching amplifier ever. It was 125 watts per channel and ran flawlessly for the four days of the show. Bose didn’t show up with a switching amp — thanks!
Following the show, the amplifier was made production-ready and sold as the SWAMP I, a 250 watt per channel amplifier. The name SWAMP came from one of Jim Henderson’s computer programs with the file name SWAMP. Infinity sold a few hundred of them. Arnie and I sold our interest in Infinity and I left in 1979. Arnie stayed on as President till about 1990, when he left to start Genesis. Well, Infinity’s part of Harman now; they sell through those big chain stores, and the new gang even wears ties to work.
More fun. I had the opportunity to head up a new hi tech company, set up to develop a video multiplexer that allowed the transmission of two TV programs over a single satellite channel with a bunch of guys I loved working with, including Jack with 125+ patents, and Dr. Jim. Big mistake! By the time we completed the research, got all kinds of patents and licensed the thing to a big broadcast equipment company, MPEG had become the standard.
After some time running a computer company and an avionics company to make sure that wasn’t what I wanted to do, I started Spectron and began work on a new generation of digital/switching amplifiers. I have always believed in them. It took three years of very long hours. My 600 hp fuel injected drag boat’s deck has been used as a table and my Lotus formula Atlantic race car is just waiting to go racing. On the design side, one thing that sure has been a big help this time is all the computer aided math, PCB layout, drafting and simulation; MathCAD, AutoCAD, all that stuff.
It seems to have worked out. Enough people really like the sound, and unlike the Infinity amp, they are very reliable. (The addition of four diodes fixes the Infinity amp — wish I knew that then.) And they are small and light. Even back at Infinity I envisioned a one kilowatt amplifier.
Conceptually, digital amplifiers are simple. You just keep sending pulses of energy alternately from the plus rail and then the minus rail into the speaker and have a feedback circuit to control all these bundles of energy coming from the plus and minus rails. Controlling the voltage at the speaker is like guiding a hockey puck on the ice. First you push from the left and then from the right and you are always making corrections as you guide the puck along the ice. The digital amp gets interesting because you do this 500,000 times a second, so the digital circuits to control corrections must be very fast.
Conceptually, the digital amps are the way to go. They use virtually no analog circuitry (except the input buffer). This eliminates nearly all the analog gain stages, which are inherently slow, each adding a small amount of distortion and delay. It’s the slowness of analog circuitry that diminishes the benefits of loop feedback, resulting in an undesirable effect on the sound. In Spectron’s digital amp, the audio is converted into a digital signal at the input. From that point on it’s processed in high speed digital logic (TTL). The output section involves two FET switches, an inductor and a couple of capacitors which are not in the signal path. If the switches were perfect, with zero turn ON and OFF times, no ON resistance and the logic had no delays, the amp would be perfect. Of course, none of the parts are perfect, but they are getting closer every year.
If all goes well, next time you hear from me, about all I’ll have to say is the amps are working great, they just keep going out the door and ya, I’ve got time to do lunch."
My impression is that the Swamp was not too good.....prototype phase it would seem. The later development by J Ulrick, the Spectron, is probably more significant. But then, to have a piece of history, aka a Swamp 1....wouldn't that be something :yes:
For those who haven't read the links yet, here are the specs on the Spectron Musician III, a descendent of the Swamp 1:
"Technical Specifications • Power Watts per channel, both channels driven
600 watts at 8 ohms
800 watts at 4 ohms
1400 watts at 2 ohms • Peak current 50 amps •"
I think my Quantum 2s would appreciate that ....yhaaa..... I think so. :thmbsp: