Back when in production they were not well thought of sonically. Harsh on the highs, large amounts of coloration and prone to self destruct. As for looks, strictly simplistic and plain Jane; a killer look that all designers should have followed. The matching tuner was not hot, typical something designed for use in the Boston market. The receiver was a combo of both. Turn them around and you could see that designers and layout team probably also did the KLH 27. If you want physical presentation that attacted get the tuner, amp, matching AR table and a set of 3s. Set it up as well as a nice Mc system and back then a Scott or Fisher and amazingly the crowd will look at the AR over the others. Simple designs can be the most impressive.
AR had a high rate of repairs on these and finally got them reliable but the sound was where it missed. The tuner while not the last word on sound still will be competent. As for using the amp, we used to suggest the KLH Five as a better mate than the 3 or 5 as it seems to tame the high end harshness better but nothing could really compensate for the coloration.
Most of these look pretty ratty today. Yours look like it has been well treated and you should explore maybe mating it up with the tuner, the AR table and a nice set of period AR speakers for a nice period vintage system.