Burke said:First, am I correct in assuming that autoformer is quickspeak for autotransformer?
What effect do autoformers have on sound? Some people seem pro, some anti-.
As you can tell from my question, I am totally new at this, but psyched.
Whitehall said:Autoformers are a trademark of McIntosh, in so far as I know, and are output coupling transformers with roughly unity turns ratios - neither stepup nor stepdown supposedly.
However, since they have different taps for different load impedances, they have to have different secondary turns.
A big advantage is they block direct (unvarying) current. DC does not pass through the magnetic coupling of a transformer. Capacitors also block DC.
Direct coupled amps either have a set bias (DC voltage) or in more fancy designs, have active biasing. They also need protection circuits to remove power if things get out of hand.
As to sound, engineering is the art of tradeoffs. If autoformers were cheaper and lighter, more manufacturers would use them. McIntosh charges more for their products and are renowned for the quality of their house sound. Some significant segment of the market seems to be saying that the sound quality from autoformers is worth the premium.
I agree.
Read his post again. He said: "Autoformer" is a trademark not "Autotransformer". It is a subtle distinction, but it is there, nonetheless.Lefty said:I don't believe that 'autotransformer' is a trademark of Mac as even a varac is a autotransformer with a variable tap rather then fixed tapes. As in:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autotransformer
Lefty
goldear said:Read his post again. He said: "Autoformer" is a trademark not "Autotransformer". It is a subtle distinction, but it is there, nonetheless.
Yes, that seems quite evident.Lefty said:However could one say that a Mac autoformer is nothing more and nothing less then a autotransformer, that is a tapped single winding audio transformer :scratch2:
Lefty