Let me defend the dual well decks. Not the majority of course, not even a large percentage of them either. Just a bunch of models that were the top of the line and were remarkably good and well built.
And these bunch is made of at least 20-30 models that rival any two head decks in global score.
For example. Top of the line sony dual decks have amorphus heads, large flywheels, two motors per well, plenty of features (like dual recording, sequenced playing). Pioneer has double decks with digital signal processing that IMHO exceed any two head deck performance (CT-606DR, CT-806DR).
Sansui D-W9 and W10 feature sankyo transports with three motors, "random music program search" "compu/syncro" (don't ask, haven't learned what it is

. I bought three of them at very low price, just to have spares, But I find myself using them.
AIWA has a double deck with one well autoreverse, and the other beign a three head well.
Marantz has a double three head deck which I don't know
Technics has double decks with dbx
I find it rather suprising that sometimes in this forum we congratulate someone for enjoying a regular average two head deck, but most of us reject the double deck idea. There are a sufficient number of them worth it.
And yes, most of these gems can be found for less than 50 eurs. But I also see asking prices going to 200 for the top of the line sony