Me too! (and the wife's irritated they are stored in her office). I used an E-place source for the foam.I am curious to see what happens with these as I have a pair of S.A.s I refoamed that are sitting around doing nuthin'.![]()
Wear protection, folks....Hole(y) 2K suckout Batman...
Hole(y) 2K suckout Batman...
Here is MY challenge...Use the tools availble in 1972 and design a better sounding affordable bookshelf speaker...:yes:
Specifically, one tight layer of 20ct flax linen, about 1/2" in front of the drivers...Wear protection, folks....![]()
Maybe a dumb question...but do my Advent/1s count as "smaller Advents"?
Thanks
Jeff
We determined in earlier Large Advent studies that the "fried egg" tweeter interferes with itself and the cabinet recesses and edges producing a conspicuous notch in the response. The grille serves to mitigate the problem, in part, at least, acting as the actual "baffle" at a forward plane. In further substantiation of this thesis, here is the tweeter playing alone without any interference from the woofer:The 2k "suckout" is a measurement artifact. It is caused by the crossover between the drivers and the directional pick up of the measuring microphone.
You are dismissively telling everyone that these measurements are not meaningful, implicitly that the results are not "real," based upon an erroneous thesis. Present a valid one, and we'll discuss that.Measuring mikes even omnis are not completely omnidirectional.