L-82
Super Member
Eric (caddy) "new" to Mcintosh 
Quote:
Originally Posted by barsur View Post
In the picture is the MR 77 and MR 78. The MR 78 is far the better tuner (after some blind test, the difference are by far bigger as with the amps), but the MR 77 is the better looking tuner.
Bye
Martin
I'm pretty new to Mc as far as ownership is concerned but your comments about the MR-78 are very consistant with everything I've read on the subject of Mc tuners. At present, I'm using a 4300 with two 2505s. But when the time comes that I decide to go for all separates, I've decided that a mint MR-78 will be in my system. Thanks for sharing.
Regards, Eric
__________________
Main: McIntosh: MC 2125 x2, MC 2155, C32, MR80 MQ 101, CR 7; Polk: RTi A7, RTi A9; Snell J7; Pioneer PL 518; A/T 440 MLa; Yamaha CD S300
Vintage: McIntosh: MX 110Z, MC 240, MC 2505; Thorens TD 145; Shure V15 III; Altec 14. BA T1000
Other: McIntosh: MAC 1500; AS 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by barsur View Post
In the picture is the MR 77 and MR 78. The MR 78 is far the better tuner (after some blind test, the difference are by far bigger as with the amps), but the MR 77 is the better looking tuner.
Bye
Martin
I'm pretty new to Mc as far as ownership is concerned but your comments about the MR-78 are very consistant with everything I've read on the subject of Mc tuners. At present, I'm using a 4300 with two 2505s. But when the time comes that I decide to go for all separates, I've decided that a mint MR-78 will be in my system. Thanks for sharing.
Regards, Eric
__________________
Main: McIntosh: MC 2125 x2, MC 2155, C32, MR80 MQ 101, CR 7; Polk: RTi A7, RTi A9; Snell J7; Pioneer PL 518; A/T 440 MLa; Yamaha CD S300
Vintage: McIntosh: MX 110Z, MC 240, MC 2505; Thorens TD 145; Shure V15 III; Altec 14. BA T1000
Other: McIntosh: MAC 1500; AS 21
