How the heck did somebody shoe-horn an "80"-sized pack into a CR-640? (Never mind why?)
It looks like the "80" pack might not be sitting flat on the heat sink. If that is so, it's a problem for that channel, whether that pack is currently functional or not.
The "40" is not a correct part, either. It should be an STK-0050II.
All properly-made STK00x0II packs are electrically very similar for low output levels, and will more or less work at such levels. The main difference is their ability to handle higher power levels, and their package size.
I continue to think that replacing the pack in the distorting channel with a 50-watt Pyramid module is a sensible thing to do, at least from a functional point of view. Whether it makes sense economically is another question.
(If the other pack is indeed ill-fitting mechanically, then it should also be replaced.)