Hello, guys!
I want to recap my newly (few months ago) acquired Renaissance 90. I actually did it already, but I find out that there are some tiny details like original caps ESR, that are not matching the new caps, which is expected ofc. My goal is to get the original sound when new, but I am also aware that is better to have greater quality caps in the crossover and gonna do some replacements, just not all at once. Also not replacing any coils for now. Firstly I did direct electrolytic caps to electrolytic replacement with Mundorf ECAP100 RAW, which made good results, but not good enough I know that this electrolytes are not the same type as the original, they use different electrolytic technology and behave differently when talking about ESR, which plays major role in this great speakers. On the bass section it doesnt really matter what kind of electrolytes you put, so there is no need to discuss it, which narrow the entire conversation to only 4 capacitors. I can exclude one of them, its marked as C2 (3uf) on my scheme, because he barely plays in role at all. But also feel free to correct me if you dont think so.

Which leave us with this 3 capacitors:

If you pay attention to the detail you will notice 2 major things in this photo. C3 (72uf) and C1 (33uf) are both orange color, which I suspect is to mark them as greater quality capacitors than the purple ones. I suspect they have lower ESR. Second major thing for noticing is that the C1 (33uf) is marked as tolerance of 2% instead of 5%. Which makes me think that it might have even lower ESR, because of using better electrolyte material to achieve better tolerance rating.
What you CAN'T see on the scheme is the ESR of the capacitors I currently use. So I will describe them here:
C1 (33uf): Its Mundorf Evo stack, it basically has no meaningful ESR, you can consider it as 0.01 ohms. On the scheme you can see that I've put R1 with 0,56 ohms of resistance. (on the pic is 0.51ohms)
C2 (3uf): Its single 3uf JB JSX MKP cap, no resistor there, originally here we had 3.1uf purple type electrolytic, which could have a lot of resistance, but I believe it doesn't matter.
C3 (72uf): I've tried here different combinations stack of ECAP100's, but currently is stack of Monacor MKT, which also have low ESR, something like 0.01 ohms. I am planning better caps here, just wanna figure out first the best ESR.
C4 (138uf): Since this is huge capacitance I am using stack of ECAP100's here, which has total ESR of 0.22 ohms, which makes it the only place where you have invisible on the scheme additional resistance. With the added resistor of 0.15 ohms it totals as 0.37 ohms.
I also have little mismatch on the C4 and C2 as you can see, please feel free to address it if you believe this might cause a problem.
The speakers sound pretty good now, but I feel this are not the correct values and there is a room for improvement. And is mostly in the department of the midbass I feel it little bit of muddy, crawling over the EMIM details, but really just a little bit. I tried to theory craft it with AI and to think of possible combos like: If C2 is 0.39 ohms, which makes it to align perfectly on phase, then C3 should be 0.18 ohms, because its the same orange type, which leads to the purple 140uf be like ~2.5 larger ESR and be something like 0.30ohms. I tried to theory craft like that and did some tries, but there I noticed the 2% tolerance rating of the C1, which dramatically trashed my theories and decided to share my pain with you guys. There might be a guy who already figured them out, so I am here giving it a try with you.
Also to include another fun fact in the post, I own Kappa 8.2i which also went into electrolytic recap, and there are only purple electrolytic caps inside, no orange. Which makes me think of the precise work that has been done here in the Renaissance 90.
I am planning to use better type of capacitors here, but I want to make the calculations first, then try it with whatever I actually have atm, so no need to inform me that there are better type of capacitors, I know it and I assure you, they are gonna be used!
After all that useless to some people info, here is the main question of the post:
If you happen to know the original ESR of any of this capacitors from the second picture when they were new, it will directly help me to resolve the ESR mystery. Or if you know the Loss Factor same type cap just little bit different capacitance, it will allow me to calculate this caps original ESR, which will lead to the same victory scenario. So anybody knows ? You can also post if you have already recapped your Renaissance 90 and have some great results, I've read the other thread couple of times, I actually have read all Renaissance 90 threads here and didn't find any useful data there, but if you have any further data please share it. This post is also about all people's experience of recapping this great speakers, so feel free to post your data here.
I want to recap my newly (few months ago) acquired Renaissance 90. I actually did it already, but I find out that there are some tiny details like original caps ESR, that are not matching the new caps, which is expected ofc. My goal is to get the original sound when new, but I am also aware that is better to have greater quality caps in the crossover and gonna do some replacements, just not all at once. Also not replacing any coils for now. Firstly I did direct electrolytic caps to electrolytic replacement with Mundorf ECAP100 RAW, which made good results, but not good enough I know that this electrolytes are not the same type as the original, they use different electrolytic technology and behave differently when talking about ESR, which plays major role in this great speakers. On the bass section it doesnt really matter what kind of electrolytes you put, so there is no need to discuss it, which narrow the entire conversation to only 4 capacitors. I can exclude one of them, its marked as C2 (3uf) on my scheme, because he barely plays in role at all. But also feel free to correct me if you dont think so.

Which leave us with this 3 capacitors:

If you pay attention to the detail you will notice 2 major things in this photo. C3 (72uf) and C1 (33uf) are both orange color, which I suspect is to mark them as greater quality capacitors than the purple ones. I suspect they have lower ESR. Second major thing for noticing is that the C1 (33uf) is marked as tolerance of 2% instead of 5%. Which makes me think that it might have even lower ESR, because of using better electrolyte material to achieve better tolerance rating.
What you CAN'T see on the scheme is the ESR of the capacitors I currently use. So I will describe them here:
C1 (33uf): Its Mundorf Evo stack, it basically has no meaningful ESR, you can consider it as 0.01 ohms. On the scheme you can see that I've put R1 with 0,56 ohms of resistance. (on the pic is 0.51ohms)
C2 (3uf): Its single 3uf JB JSX MKP cap, no resistor there, originally here we had 3.1uf purple type electrolytic, which could have a lot of resistance, but I believe it doesn't matter.
C3 (72uf): I've tried here different combinations stack of ECAP100's, but currently is stack of Monacor MKT, which also have low ESR, something like 0.01 ohms. I am planning better caps here, just wanna figure out first the best ESR.
C4 (138uf): Since this is huge capacitance I am using stack of ECAP100's here, which has total ESR of 0.22 ohms, which makes it the only place where you have invisible on the scheme additional resistance. With the added resistor of 0.15 ohms it totals as 0.37 ohms.
I also have little mismatch on the C4 and C2 as you can see, please feel free to address it if you believe this might cause a problem.
The speakers sound pretty good now, but I feel this are not the correct values and there is a room for improvement. And is mostly in the department of the midbass I feel it little bit of muddy, crawling over the EMIM details, but really just a little bit. I tried to theory craft it with AI and to think of possible combos like: If C2 is 0.39 ohms, which makes it to align perfectly on phase, then C3 should be 0.18 ohms, because its the same orange type, which leads to the purple 140uf be like ~2.5 larger ESR and be something like 0.30ohms. I tried to theory craft like that and did some tries, but there I noticed the 2% tolerance rating of the C1, which dramatically trashed my theories and decided to share my pain with you guys. There might be a guy who already figured them out, so I am here giving it a try with you.
Also to include another fun fact in the post, I own Kappa 8.2i which also went into electrolytic recap, and there are only purple electrolytic caps inside, no orange. Which makes me think of the precise work that has been done here in the Renaissance 90.
I am planning to use better type of capacitors here, but I want to make the calculations first, then try it with whatever I actually have atm, so no need to inform me that there are better type of capacitors, I know it and I assure you, they are gonna be used!
After all that useless to some people info, here is the main question of the post:
If you happen to know the original ESR of any of this capacitors from the second picture when they were new, it will directly help me to resolve the ESR mystery. Or if you know the Loss Factor same type cap just little bit different capacitance, it will allow me to calculate this caps original ESR, which will lead to the same victory scenario. So anybody knows ? You can also post if you have already recapped your Renaissance 90 and have some great results, I've read the other thread couple of times, I actually have read all Renaissance 90 threads here and didn't find any useful data there, but if you have any further data please share it. This post is also about all people's experience of recapping this great speakers, so feel free to post your data here.
Last edited:







