pioneer CT-F1250 Heads nightmare

rotovator

Cassette deck fanatic
[This post discusses some tapedeck's head problems and DIY tests. It is probably not interesting to those not skilled or experienced in repairing vintage decks, and it's quite long]

I've been repairing my old aged Pioneer CT-F1250. When I bought it, it was probably the
most used and dusty deck I've ever seen. From outside, it looked quite correct. once open
the internals were covered in dust.

The deck was mechanically ill and electronically totally out of specs. Motor had no torque,
it couldn't rewind or ff with energy. Play position could't go for more than 20 seconds
Recording was totally impossible. Calibration procedure was pure fantasy. And playback
sound was dull and without highs.

I changed belts, tyres, cleaned the motor internals twice, replaced pinch roller tyres
cleaned many pulleys, azimuth adj. demag (several times with two devices), etc.

I tried to recalibrate the recording circuit and made recording possible, though with
low quality.

The only thing left was to get a decent playback response.
Upon close visual inspection, the heads looked fine. I used a magnifying glass and proper
illumination to check for any crack on the surface. I think those heads have a crystal
layer and are quite resistan to wear. The surface looked perfectly shaped, elyptical
without cracks or flat areas. I've run across several weared heads and can
tell the diference from a unweared one..

I checked all the things that I can think of, even the pots on the playback eq circuit.

So, at this point I had planned to either replace caps in the playback circuitery or
to test the circuitery from sources other than the mounted heads. I highly suspected
that the heads or playback circuit was bad.

One worrying symptom happened when recording and monitoring the response (tape position),
I could hear the highs from the original music played together with
the music readed off the tape. I think that the magnetic flux emitted by the
record head reaches the playback head and induces a response. I recorded withouth
any tape while the tape/source switch was set to tape and I could clearly listen
to that very high equalized signal I was sending to the record heads. Sometimes this
may happen, but this time was like I never heard before. To further experiment, I
placed a steel screwdriver over the head at a very close distance and it seems that
the magnetic flux from the record head was driven to the playback signal much more. the
level was loud and the sound was even more linearly equalized as if there was a real
tape passing by the heads.

To get more data I did the following test which can be interesting to other people willing
to repair their decks with similar problems. I took a Pioneer CT-F600, an old aged deck, I fixed it
from some of the problems it had. I put a new head because old was visually weared and didn't
play fine. The new head played much better .

I made a pair of shielded cables with alligator clips ((signal + ground) x 2) on
its ends to connect the output of the heads (input of the amplifier circuit) of
one CTF600 deck to the same point in the CT-F1250 (input of the amplifier circuit).
this is: both decks shared both heads. It is like if one deck used the heads of the other deck


Besides, I connected the line output of the small CTF600 deck to the record rca input of
the CT-F1250. And the output of the big CT-F1250 to the amplifier.

This way I could:
Play a tape in the small CT-F600 with new heads use the head amplifier
section of any deck and compare them by swaping tape/source in the
CT-F1250. I could also adjust playback levels ( recording level) to my
needs.

Or I could do just the same but with the cassette inserted in the
CT-F1250.


During any test only one of the two decks had a cassette in it, the other was playing empty.

Results:

The tape, when played with the new head of the CT-F600 sounded crisp and clear
on both decks. CT-F1250 seemed to amplify better; but, probably due different
equalization, lacked some bass. So I calibrated the playback equalization (only
possible in the CT-F1250 AFAIK) and both decks showed similar playback
response.

When the tape was played with the heads of the CT-F1250 (on either of the two decks
amplifying the heads signal) the sound was dull, without heighs
on any of the two decks (azimuthed ok). This time, the CT-F1250 was also better, but
the sound was so bad that it was unimportan to think about it.

The test showed that I couldn't get any acceptable sound quality from the CT-F1250's head.
While other head did sound much better.



conclusion so far: The venerable crystal head is damaged or degradated somehow.
I think The test made leaves no doubt.

I need new heads for my beast, and I highly suspect they are unobtanium.
 
Register to hide this ad
I have a CT-F900 that plays tapes ok and sounds great but it will not FF or reverse.
I would like to fix it eventually.
There was a guy on that auction site parting out a pioneer Ct-F900 I don't know if yours uses same head?
 
Rotovator, you've done a great deal more than I would have done under these circumstances. If you're confident that the head isn't magnetized, azimuth alignment is optimized, and tape is tracking smoothly over the head with correct tension, then the head is toast. You'll probably need a better lens to see the damage, but trust me, it's there.
 
I'm aware that any other CT-F1000, ct-F1250 and maybe ct-f950 can be a donnor deck from which take the head.

I thank you for your advice to see your great american site of auctions, but It is not practical for me (spain) to buy there. I can buy in Germany, where the auction market is huge (about twice that of the USA) but the germans, western europe enthusiats and many other europeans are going mad for getting quality decks. Final prices on faulty decks are going insane.

I'm limited to find some cheap unit from spain, which may take some time and some luck.

I have a CT-F900 that plays tapes ok and sounds great but it will not FF or reverse.
I would like to fix it eventually.

Probably the idle tyre, cleaning it may help. I changed mine as well.
 
With a ferrite head it is quite difficult to tell what the condition is without a proper microscope. The picture attached is of a gap in an old Sony F&F head (similar to heads used in TC-177SD, TC-229SD etc.) Even with a strong magnifying glass that head looks near perfect. Drop me a PM, I may be able to help you with a suitable head for the CT-F1250.

Alex
 

Attachments

  • Sony_HPF_head.jpg
    Sony_HPF_head.jpg
    94.4 KB · Views: 113
Back
Top Bottom