• Please note that there are a few updates and clarifications made in the Audiokarma Rules, mostly relating to advertising and the addition of the new "Paying it Forward" & "Giving back" forums in the AudioKarma Audio Marketplace section.

Pioneer S-910, home and working...

Copa1934

My ears are bleeding
But before I begin, very big thank you to John (nerdorama) for "gifting" me the speakers. I'm confident I can't salvage the woofers, as is, but looking into some kind of recone that hopefully won't be paper. Not against paper, but more later.

First Road Trip! I learned about John and his 910 through my other "S" series post, the Pioneer S-710. You can read more here http://www.audiokarma.org/forums/showthread.php?t=583273 also in that thread are images of 910 woofers I acquired around the same time as the replacement 710 woofer. My thought, at the time, was trying both sets in the same cabinet. But before getting that far along John contacted me and boy am I glad. I'm near the SE corner of WA, or NE corner of OR. He's just south of Seattle, where we once lived many moon ago. Driving across the state of WA is like traveling to Barstow, Palm Springs, or through parts of UT or NV. Boring! Only entertainment is dumb drivers, and boy there are plenty. Made it safely and John and I had some great conversation. Similar interests, mostly audio related. Seattle area was 10 degrees cooler than where we live, but at 60+ unconventionally warm. Felt like a shorts and sandles day. Almost.

Got them home without incident. I'll take images of the woofers I received with these speakers later. For images of the woofers that I used, check the 710 link.

Thankfully the only thing I had to do was clean up some "extra" holes used by other woofers. Once done I was able to mount my woofers cleanly into the cabinets.

About the 910 speakers. Certainly these could be compared to HPM, like 100 and 900, the latter I'm not personally familiar with. People have written that the 100 is better constructed and I would agree. It's not terribly huge, but there are differences. First the 100 have a 1" baffle, where the 910 is 3/4". Still 3/4" is not bad. The bigger difference, to me, is the use of machine screws in all the 100 drivers, where the 710 and 910 use wood screws. Again, they work, but if after service the screws are not "started" correctly the wood can be stripped out. I didn't have issues with screws, well one and that was one screw was missing. Got bloody lucky as I had a couple dozen of exactly the correct speaker in my spare speaker parts case. I think the 100 had more insulation, but not positive. I can't compare either because I've already parted with the 100 (weeks ago).

I'll say I don't miss my 100. If that doesn't grab your attention, oh well. The latter model HPM and "S" series speakers have stamped metal frame woofers and so far I couldn't find ANYTHING negative about this in listening. I'll post T/S later, but the 910 are Fs(25), I'll double check this number later. The 710 are a respectable Fs(35). Two very obvious differences between 710 and 910 (size isn't huge, they need to be side by side to see the difference). First the 910 has contour for Mid and tweeter, where the 710 is just the mid. Second, the 910 tweeter is visually cooler looking, having metal parts, where the 710 is entirely plastic. I'll do more listening comparisons later, but they seem pretty close in the high end. Both speakers share the same mid, the only thing in common really.

Bass is not lacking at all, period. Easily equal to the 100, but more controlled, tighter sounding. I was surprised, but only because of the negative comments about stamped baskets. I think thoughts on this subject are misplaced or exaggerated.

OK, correction, the 710 does have one thing in common with the 910 and that is imaging. The tweeter, in both, really are pretty impressive with the edge going to the 910. And we're talking depth. I didn't play with placement at all. I plopped them where the 100 formerly were, hooked them up and let them run. I left the room entirely so the caps could break in (due to being idle for so long). Upon my return I sat down and gave them a listen and wasn't disappointed in the least. The one thing that let me down, and only slightly at first, was the bass. It was so powerful and present, especially at lower volume. But with material that tended to be bass "heavy", the bass would tend to sound exaggerated. Not as natural sounding. The other was a tendency to become overly "bright" at higher listening levels. The first thing I noticed about the 710 was the balance was better, though coming across a tad weak in the bass department, again comparing to the 100. But, as the volume was pushed, the bass would "catchup" with the other drivers, almost non-linearly, unlike the 100 which would simply continue to get brighter and brighter. Bass would increase, of course, but still lagged behind the mids and highs. I hoped for similar with the 910, but got more. The bass was better than the 710 and tighter than the 100. Double blessing.

I think I'm going to stop here so this doesn't become too long winded. I'll make more posts, along with images. Additional posts will be about specific listening experience, with artists and selections mentioned.

The images are one woofer prior to new rubber surround and after surround attached. Since I haven't listened to a pair with foam surrounds I can't comment on the difference. But I can say they work, they work well, and the rubber looks really cool. The other images are of the crossover and back of the speaker. I'll check my 710 again but I don't believe that it's marked (R) or (L) even though my 710 are mirror image.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1968.jpg
    IMG_1968.jpg
    83.1 KB · Views: 183
  • IMG_1969.jpg
    IMG_1969.jpg
    99.6 KB · Views: 185
  • IMG_1997.jpg
    IMG_1997.jpg
    80.5 KB · Views: 169
  • IMG_2004.jpg
    IMG_2004.jpg
    62 KB · Views: 156
  • IMG_2005.jpg
    IMG_2005.jpg
    56.2 KB · Views: 152
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
It was great to meet you. I enjoyed our conversation but wish we had more time for the visit. Hope you have some good fun with the speakers.
John
 
It was great to meet you. I enjoyed our conversation but wish we had more time for the visit. Hope you have some good fun with the speakers.
John
Definitely would have been nice. I'll have to let you know next time I'm in the neigborhood. Still have friends there so could happen.

I'm growing impatient. I don't normally get time in with my equipment on weekdays, so weekends I may spend hours in the man cave. My friend wants the 910, but will "settle" for the 710. He bought my HPM-100 and already fascinated with the "S" series speakers.

So far I'm truly enjoying them. I think the room and equipment I'm using is a nice match. The Pioneer SX-680 is next to the bottom of the line receiver, and yet delivers quite well on sound. Looking forward to using my SA-7500II, but one channel is acting up. Needs service. I'd like to find a 8500 or 9100 or 9500 Pioneer. That would be very cool to drive all these buggers.
 
More images...

Side views and front. The finish on these, while not wood veneer, is pretty nice. Also seems to be more durable than typical vinyl. Sorry the images suck.

Note the differences in the tweeters. The 710 is all plastic, where the 910 is metal, or mostly I believe.

Got the 710 stacked and inverted and tweeter inboard, like the 910. This DOES give the best imaging, at least in my room that was the case.

To the right of the 710 is an HPM-60. Still have my 40's down stairs in the HT system, but that may not be for long. But that's another story.

Those Rubber surrounds really look nice. Since I'm not the original owner and haven't heard these with foam I can't say how rubber changed things. I just know I like them. Period.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2012.jpg
    IMG_2012.jpg
    69.9 KB · Views: 189
  • IMG_2010.jpg
    IMG_2010.jpg
    44.8 KB · Views: 147
  • IMG_2009.jpg
    IMG_2009.jpg
    83.4 KB · Views: 226
  • IMG_2008.jpg
    IMG_2008.jpg
    82.9 KB · Views: 126
  • IMG_2007.jpg
    IMG_2007.jpg
    86.3 KB · Views: 124
Nice. :)
These are very accurate speakers...the 710 I measured was extremely flat across the bandwidth.
I thought an SX-737 sounded very sweet with all my DSS and S series.

Unless I am wrong...the 910 has a berrylium ribbon tweeter like the DSS-9.???
The 710 has an aluminum ribbon.(Still reaches over 30k in the specs)
EDIT...poly mids on the 910 and 710...boron on the DSS-9...EDIT cuz I was wrong ;)

They all have polygraphite woofers...with the DSS having a dual coil cast frame woofer.
None of them are slouches and are good enough to show up bad recordings.
:)

Sadly,my 910s are not mirrored...all my others are.
 
Last edited:
Nice. :)
These are very accurate speakers...the 710 I measured was extremely flat across the bandwidth.
I thought an SX-737 sounded very sweet with all my DSS and S series.

Unless I am wrong...the 910 has a berrylium ribbon tweeter like the DSS-9.
The 710 has an aluminum ribbon.(Still reaches over 30k in the specs)
They all have a boron mid and polygraphite woofers...with the DSS having a dual coil cast frame woofer.
None of them are slouches and are good enough to show up bad recordings.
:)

Sadly,my 910s are not mirrored...all my others are.
The mids on mine don't appear to be the boron. Retail for the 710/910 mid is $68ea where the DSS9 is $238! There's a pair on ebay, but one is clearly damaged.

I would have to drive to either Spokane or Seattle to find a pair of DSS9. I can't recall seeing any listed in CL before.

In any case, the 710 and 910 are definitely respectable speakers. No complaints from me.

Even though they cut corners in manufacturing (thinner mdf, stamped steel frames, etc.) the performance is still superior to the HPM line, though I have not yet heard a 700/900 speaker system. I've read the bigger speakers are better still, like the 150/1500 etc. But those aren't much easier to find, than the DSS line.

Maybe some day, but for now I'm happy, and my friend wants my speakers so I know I'm doing good.
 
The S-910 does not have the boron cone mid. It's a PG cone. I own 910's and DSS-9's. The 910 is a very nice speaker in its own right, much better than the HPM-100 IMO, but the DSS-9 is in a significantly higher class sonically.
 
Congrats Copa! I think that it's great how AK members are so willing to help other members with their needs. I have received and try to pass the karma along with others. I hope you enjoy them, and good luck with the restoration.
 
Woofer image, bad woofers..

Here is an image of one of the bad woofers. This shows the worst of the two. The other can be made out to the right of the "coneless" woofer. The VC has been shimmed. The other woofer has multiple chips out of the cone and numerous cracks, the worst of which begin at the VC and goes outward. Due to gaps these can't be repaired so I'm thinking recone. I had a separate post regarding fiberglass vs kevlar and there weren't any comments last time I checked. I'm leaning towards using kevlar to reproduce the cone since I believe the stiffness will be closer to the graphite than paper or poly. Casting will not be without challenges, especially since the one cone is missing chunks and has cracks. Not the best piece to work with.

The woofers were in this condition prior to John getting them, and then passing them along to me.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2040.jpg
    IMG_2040.jpg
    94 KB · Views: 95
The S-910 does not have the boron cone mid. It's a PG cone. I own 910's and DSS-9's. The 910 is a very nice speaker in its own right, much better than the HPM-100 IMO, but the DSS-9 is in a significantly higher class sonically.

Thanks...I thought maybe my info on those was suspect.

Is the 910 tweeter berylium or aluminum?

I dislike spreading false information. :no: :music:
 
I've never been able to find anything that says that what material the ribbon is on the S-910. The service manual just describes it as a horn-loaded ribbon tweeter. It's a nice sounding tweeter though!
 
I've never been able to find anything that says that what material the ribbon is on the S-910. The service manual just describes it as a horn-loaded ribbon tweeter. It's a nice sounding tweeter though!
According to http://parts.pioneerelectronics.com/model.asp?modelNum=S910&x=21&y=10

It uses the PT-R14A, and at $72 I'm thinking something other than beryllium. But I could be wrong, Lord knows I have been in the past.

Looking at the DSS parts list http://parts.pioneerelectronics.com/model.asp?modelNum=DSS9 and the tweeter is almost twice that of the PT-R14A
 
According to http://parts.pioneerelectronics.com/model.asp?modelNum=S910&x=21&y=10

It uses the PT-R14A, and at $72 I'm thinking something other than beryllium. But I could be wrong, Lord knows I have been in the past.

Looking at the DSS parts list http://parts.pioneerelectronics.com/model.asp?modelNum=DSS9 and the tweeter is almost twice that of the PT-R14A
Oh my, the tweeter for the S710 retailed for more than the S910! Go figure.

http://parts.pioneerelectronics.com/model.asp?modelNum=S710
 
Detailed review, long winded, part 1

It's funny reading reviews, reading about how "accurate" something sounds, or similar impossible references, to me. Accurate is a technical word in that there is no almost, sort of, kind of, could be, it's either accurate or it's not. Period. Unless one was present for a particular recording how could one say "that recording is accurate"?

Listening to Lenny Kravitz "Are you gonna go my way". Good CD, but nothing "technically" spectacular to review. However, instruments do come across more natural sounding, for the most part. The first thing that always jumps out with these speakers (and HPM speakers) is bass. With some speakers to bring this up somehow automatically brings about thoughts of "...oh yeah, they always have too much bass...", "oh that's all they're known for..", etc. What I'm referring to is more the "wow, didn't know the bass was that good in that recording" or "that's the kind of bass I was expecting". So more the pleasant surprise, something of a gift of sorts. "Black Girl" just came on and the opening with the cymbals is incredible. Being a former drummer I often judge speakers by their ability to reproduce drums, but mostly cymbals. Instruments that have a more "airy" sound to them, or "crispness" are often bland, muddy or dull. Not always, but rarely that really crisp defined characteristic. Back to bass, briefly. When I listen to certain selections I get the impression that when something is "boomy", that is the intention, otherwise the selections that have very clearly solid hard hitting bass would come across boomy as well (with lesser speakers). So it seems that these speakers are presenting the recording as intended. To say intended is not to say accurate. I have no clue. But when instruments and vocals sound "real" to me I know the speakers are likely not coloring the sound. Maybe, of course to some degree, but again, not being present AT the recording how am I to say for certain?

Rush "Chronicles". Pretty cool collection of songs. I'm not a big fan, meaning I don't have a collection of their LP's or CD's. I do have a SACD/DVD sampler that is pretty cool. Rush just simply has a style I like. I can't put my finger on it, but it doesn't matter really. Those who enjoy Rush understand. "Working Man", certainly one of the more over played Rush tunes. This is one tune that no matter what system I listen to it one it doesn't get better. Seems like one of those recordings that you enjoy, without regard to the technical aspects, however, there are some standout moments like the early bass solo, which really sounded better on these speakers than I recall on other speakers. Sounded like a bass should sound, where you hear the harmonics, not just the cord itself. Sorry, have to touch on cymbals again. Neil Peart is one of the more incredible and highly regarded drummers of all time. Trust me, I grew up on Buddy Rich and Gene Krupa. All too often cymbals disappear or seam lack luster. That doesn't happen with these speakers. The snare sounds like I expect a snare to sound. "Fly by Night", another popular tune. My poor SX-680, getting such a workout today. Ah the drums, so cool in that track. "Anthem", nice drum opening. Boy these speakers are "tight". Drums sound awesome. The cool thing about the drums in Rush is that they are not just Rhythm, they are part of the performance. "2112", good instrumental, would have liked it more had it remained an instrumental. I think, honestly, one can tire of Geddy Lee's vocals. Amazing voice, to be sure. Listening to his voice track after track takes a toll on me. "Closer to the Heart". Not just well engineered, but provocative lyrics. One of my favorites, along with "Tom Sawyer", "Subdivisions", "New World Man"... " "La Villa", awesome instrumental. Loved that track. Hadn't heard it before today. I've never had the time or chance to sit through this collection, so nice to hear something I hadn't heard before. Betting this doesn't get much air time due to it's length. No excuse. But of course "Free will"! Man the drums really sound good with these speakers. Like I said, drums aren't just rhythm with Rush, Neil Peart is just as cool as the guitar players. He's a star, period.

Good grief what would these sound like with 240w (their max rating)? Wholly crap!

Switching gears. Rush CD's need cleaning! Dang! LP time.

Yes "Fragile". Roundabout. Love this tune. Dang, I need to clean this LP. Still, sounds great. Definitely the best this has sounded. love the acoustic guitar. I haven't listened to this LP in it's entirety, will do another day...

Gary Wright, "Dream Weacer". "love is alive". One of his more popular tunes. I think I'm beginning to see a pattern, one in which it all comes back to the amazing tweeters in these speakers. Of course I touched on the bass, that jumps out, but the highs are quite brilliant, in both it's meanings. Man the highs are impressive. And to think the DSS line is even better. Wow. Not likely to spend too much time on this LP, though honestly it grew on me quickly. The power of the bass shines through in "The Power of Love". Just as it does again with "Dream Weaver". Boy does that keyboard come on strong. There are things that do stand out with this LP, possibly because I haven't listened to it in a while. Really shines with hard hitting speakers.

Bob James "Three". "Westchester Lady". Really switching gears here, ha ha. I love this tune for it's use of so many instruments in "solos". Great montage of instruments. Varying in it's intensity, going from soft and cool to strong and vibrant. All over the place with instruments coming in, going out. Not, at the moment noticing anything startling different, with maybe the exception of highs being a little clearer, little bit better detail. Letting the LP play through I am noticing, once again, the highs. Nice, clear, crisp, more open sounding. Really depends, I'm noticing, with the types of music.

Just a moment of pause to reflect. What is becoming even more apparent to me is the engineering aspects of recordings. Many people will state that a bad recording sounds really bad on good equipment. I'm not sure now that I agree, though in the past I would. I would say that good equipment doesn't help. I don't find that the "poor" recordings necessarily sound any worse, they just don't get "lifted" the way good recordings do. A better way of stating it is "good recordings sound better on good equipment". Good equipment lifts good recordings to a new level of enjoyment.

Now, on to Toto "Toto" their first release. One of my older LP's, owned since new. Sounding good. One thing that seems to sound a tad more realistic is the keyboard. Overall enjoyable.

Something else came to mind. The medium, in this case LP. I'm thinking now that people often expect too much from their speakers. Think "the weakest link". Now I'm not saying or implying that my TT is the weak link here, however, it isn't unreasonable to conclude that the speakers (mine or yours) may not give you dramatic improvements (overall) without upping the "links" in the rest of the system. So I'm pretty sure that some of my opinions are pretty spot on, however, there may be instances where little to no improvement detected could simply be the result of the limitations of the TT, Cartridge, marriage of the "system" (i.e. compatibility of components). It's something, certainly, to think about.

Styx "Pieces of Eight". Man it's been a while since I've listened to this LP. Bass? Not much improvement, but heck it's only the first track. But, again, the highs, wow. I'm going to emphasize that this is not ear splitting, overly bright highs, but rather clear and crisp. Am I repeating myself? Yup, but should come as no surprise, or more to the point it's not a fluke. Almost everything, up to this point, has seen some improvement, but mostly in the top end. Have you noticed that with some speakers cymbals tend to sound more like "tiss tiss" rather than "ting ting" when more in the background? Not here. They are definitely ting ting sounding, like they should. Listening to "I'm O.K." and man that organ is sounding good. Saw Styx with REO in Puyallup around 2004. That was fun. You know, the late 70's were a great time, with many great bands, etc. Just saying. Oooo, "Sing for the day". Wow that opening sounded good. Um, WOW "The Message"! I'm surprised the record wasn't skipping! Felt like sitting in a message chair. Wow. That was wicked. No distortion, just deep throbbing bass. Let me just remind you, this experience is being delivered by a little ol SX-680! I got back into LP's in the last couple years or so. Of course, in the beginning, I loved LP's. After my equipment was stolen in college I boxed my LP's and dragged them with me to where ever life lead me. Eventually I bought a TT, used, and it was OK. Problem was I didn't take the time and effort to dial it in. Later I would acquire a better TT and felt I should make the effort and it was worth it. Forgot just how nice LP's are, that is clean and in good condition LP's anyway. Need to do a better job cleaning some, I can hear the "noise" from being in less than ideal condition.
 
Detailed review, long winded, part 2

Boz Scaggs "Silk Degrees". Again the highs stuck out for me. I'm including this just for sake of variety so that people have some input from a variety of genre. Nothing really stood out, might just be that my other speakers did sufficiently well or this LP may not be special engineering wise.

Dave Brubeck "All the things we are". This is NOT my cup of tea. Jazz tends to be more about freestyle than continuity. Expressive is what some people would say, but I believe most music to be expressive. With true jazz you don't "color in the lines", you go where ever your mind tells you to. You color outside the lines. It's artistic sure. As for the engineering, good stuff, really good stuff. When engineers blend music in recordings it's like someone taking several colors of oil paints (my mom was an oil painter), and swirling them around and around till you have one color left. With a good recording, the individual colors remain, in swirls, overlapping, but never blending to the point they disappear into one color. A piano sounds like a piano, now granted miking plays a huge role. Not just placement but the type of mic as well. I admire Jazz recordings more than I enjoy them. I don't know, personally, that this LP is a good representation of "Jazz", but I believe it does as this is what the father of an old flame listened to, intently. My best friends father was a music instructor and loved Brubeck and Spyro Gyra (which I will cover later). Simply put, the instruments in this LP, played through the S-910, sounded the way I would expect them to sound. The recording reminds me of being in a club, and I am talking about "feeling" not just the content. Boy that piano sounds very close to real, more so than other speakers I've listened to, with maybe the exception of the Bose 901. I'll have to give this a listen on that system again.

The Cars Candy-O. Oh! Drums definitely sound better. The individual drums are more apparent, where with some speakers it sounds as though it was just a snair, bass and tom tom. Clarity is better. Man these speakers hit solid and hard. Not talking about exaggerated either, more realistic. Vocals, with all the recordings aren't muddied and background vocals don't seem lost, where you barely make them out, drowned out by leads or the instruments. And of course how can one not like LP cover art. Had to throw that in to see if anyone was actually reading this. Whoa, did I just hear sliding on the strings, on "It's all I can do"? I don't recall noticing this before. OK, someone tell me if that's what I'm hearing.

Police "Ghosts in the machine". Hmmm, now that is some bass. "Spirits in the material world", this IS the best I've heard it yet. Some impressive bass "licks" in this track. If you are a drummer, or just love drums these speakers are IT. Not to say other instruments don't sound good, it's just not characteristic of most speakers I've owned or listened to. No point doing track by track, these speakers love The Police, well the band at least, hoping my neighbors don't CALL the police. That's $0.50 well spent!!!

I'll be back with more next weekend. Will be listening to SACD, DVD Audio and other such stuff.
 
The comparison of the HPM-100 and S-910 cabinets is a good example of how much more important drivers/crossovers are than the sturdiness or "build" of the cabinet.

HPM-100's were built pretty solid but don't sound all that great. HPM-900's had the same size cabinet with less weight but better drivers and sound significantly better than the HPM-100's. The S-910 and DSS-9's use similar cabinet materials but much better drivers and blow away the HPM-100's even though the cabinets are not as well built. I'm still surprised at the sound my DSS-9's put out even after over a year of ownership.
 
Back
Top Bottom