Nikon D610 and Z8. The jpegs are pretty good from both, but that only means they are some software engineers best guess at what scenes will probably look like. I want them to be MY vision of the scene... I'm the one that was there. Same as when I shot film; I wanted to develop and print my own photos. I didn't get to very often because I didn't have regular access to a darkroom, but I wanted to. Digital post-processing is the same to me.
Ultimately it's everyone's choice as to how they go about determining what they want to use. I almost never use jpegs, and until just a few days ago I didn't even have the camera configured to generate them. I typically generate TIFFs from RAW files and upload them to Smugmug.
I had a darkroom years ago. Anyone can develop and print black and white. Color took considerably more work. I don't miss it, and I agree that post processing in the digital age is essentially the same as what darkroom processing was to film.
I've seen a fair number of people make derogatory comments about post processing digital images here, but if they don't think the same thing went on in a darkroom they're sadly mistaken. I've also seen a fair number of images where people go crazy on the post processing trying to make something out of an image that isn't there. Oversharpening seems to be a staple process for some.
Insofar as the few SooC jpegs I've posted lately, they are a good representation of what I saw at the time I was taking the pictures. Yesterday when I looked at the skyline and saw that sliver of color on the horizon (the last picture I posted), the jpeg was pretty much what I saw.
I just ran through a quickie post process on the RAW file from that image, where I cropped it to a 3:1 aspect ratio to better balance the image, adjusted the exposure, worked on the contrast and denoised it. What I ended up with looks like the jpeg for the most part aside from the aspect ratio -- and it's a much cleaner image too. The jpeg was pretty noisy and didn't respond to denoise well. I didn't touch anything directly color related. Somewhat surprised me actually.
What really surprised me is that I shot that at 1/20 exposure (this time with IBIS turned on). I was leaning against a door frame which definitely helped.
This is the image I wanted, and the jpeg came pretty close overall.