Used to love loudness, now I hate it. What changed?

I too have come to not use a loudness anymore either.Then again loudness equipped stereos are not part of my main systems anymore but I had started to not use it anymore.It just started to sound muddy to me at times but not always.
 
The only time I use loudness is when I am playing music as back ground music during dinner or serving drinks during polite conversation. Thats with the music at or below 50 db levels which really quiet. Your ears sensitivity to bass at those levels is more than 20 to 25 db below the 2 kHz octave band where the ear is most sensitive.
 
The only time I use loudness is when I am playing music as back ground music during dinner or serving drinks during polite conversation. Thats with the music at or below 50 db levels which really quiet. Your ears sensitivity to bass at those levels is more than 20 to 25 db below the 2 kHz octave band where the ear is most sensitive.

Same here. Most of my listening is done in rooms with ambient between 30 and 40 dB. When I listen at low levels, loudness is on because it sounds much better. Low level is where I can talk on the phone with the music playing and not worry about the music interfering with the call. That is between 40 and 50 dB for me.

I am currently listening to SRV at around 60 to 65 dB. Loudness is not needed nor wanted at this level and above.
 
Are my ears changing? Is my brain changing? Is my hearing changing? Is my equipment changing?

I used to think that without loudness, everything sounded anemic, with loudness everything sounds perfect. Now....loudness makes everything sound bloated and woofy. Without loudness it sounds right. Same gear, same recordings, same rooms.

This change was gradual, not overnight.

Thoughts?
You're going through Audio Puberty. You'll also start to like the alluring pops and crackles of vinyl surface noise. The worst thing, though, is the acne.
 
I think loudness is useful at low levels and while the OP said same gear, same room same material, didn't say same listening levels are the same, so possible the levels are higher.

I know when I've left my loudness on by mistake after late evening, low-level listening when I crank it up the next day, but if I were to slowly lower the volume, I suppose I would get to a point where it stops sounding horrible and the bass boost is actually pleasing. Wherever that point is would be the highest level I would ever consider using loudness - for me probably around 40 to 45db or so depending on the type of music.
 
I don't use the loudness. Not even the variable loudness on my Yamaha. When play my music at low levels, I enjoy the midrange and let my brain fill in the bass and all is good.
 
For me it was life,after 8 hours at work I need music that relaxes me more so as I've gotten older. I even enjoy more relaxing music like new age and jazz now. Don't get me wrong I still crank rnr but these days not so much.
The loudness button is to be used at low volume levels,it boosts the bass.
 
Last edited:
I haven't used loudness since my teens. I tried it once after I got my new speakers and it sounded worse than one of those ghetto sleighs with a couple of 15's in the truck. I disengage the tone controls on my pre-amp.
 
You grew older, and probably the wife doesn't like it loud.

I'm always being told to turn it down.... And I try turn it back up a little when I think she won't notice. With either level you don't have to raise your voice to talk though.
 
Same here. My tone settings, and or EQs are usually set flat, maby a tiny tweak depending on the song.
I do still love chest pounding bass you can feel in the air though, but that's mostly when I'm crankin it!
 
Good gear is the cure.
I'm always saying bass is like sugar. Get yourself off of it and you start tasting the actual flavor.
 
Are my ears changing? Is my brain changing? Is my hearing changing? Is my equipment changing?

I used to think that without loudness, everything sounded anemic, with loudness everything sounds perfect. Now....loudness makes everything sound bloated and woofy. Without loudness it sounds right. Same gear, same recordings, same rooms.
Once I got away from mid-fi, I realized I no longer needed it. I think in my case, it might have been tendency to listen slightly louder, and I am not using it for low-level background music anymore either. (I have a small tubed system on my work/computer desk.) The floor-standing speakers I own now also tend towards the warmer side of things, so at lower levels they don't thin out like other speakers I have used.

Although I had this cool trick for really late night listening, back when I had a lesser preamp. I own a dbx 118:

upload_2019-11-14_10-30-30.png

Dynamic range expanders are wretched sounding, but....what about the "Compress" side of the knob? It's perfect to level out the volume of music when listening at super-low levels, and that is what I bought it for. I had a newer model, a 1bx-ds, but unfortunately I bought it dirt cheap needing repair, and nobody has ever been able to determine the type of potentiometer it needs (linear vs. logarithmic) to replace the one that is missing. (I have the value, 100kΩ, but it makes no mention of the type.) I kept it in a tape monitor loop on my old preamp so I could cut it out of the path completely.
 
Once I got away from mid-fi, I realized I no longer needed it. I think in my case, it might have been tendency to listen slightly louder, and I am not using it for low-level background music anymore either. (I have a small tubed system on my work/computer desk.) The floor-standing speakers I own now also tend towards the warmer side of things, so at lower levels they don't thin out like other speakers I have used.

Although I had this cool trick for really late night listening, back when I had a lesser preamp. I own a dbx 118:

View attachment 1672231

Dynamic range expanders are wretched sounding, but....what about the "Compress" side of the knob? It's perfect to level out the volume of music when listening at super-low levels, and that is what I bought it for. I had a newer model, a 1bx-ds, but unfortunately I bought it dirt cheap needing repair, and nobody has ever been able to determine the type of it needs (linear vs. logarithmic) to replace the one that is missing. (I have the value, 100kΩ, but it makes no mention of the type.) I kept it in a tape monitor loop on my old preamp so I could cut it out of the path completely.
You should post that question in the tape category about the potentiometer. Someone may have the answer you seek.
 
I too have come to not use a loudness anymore either.Then again loudness equipped stereos are not part of my main systems anymore but I had started to not use it anymore.It just started to sound muddy to me at times but not always.

You certainly made a point that is most notable.. :thumbsup:"Then again loudness equipped stereos are not part of my main systems".. and this is true for most newer systems that lean more towards detent controlled volume and digitally fed amplification. The "loudness" feature is non existent :no:

My :idea: theory: Analog signal power amplification needed a feature that would enhance the loss or cutoff frequencies at lower volumes of play, ergo.. the "loudness" button/toggle. Modern amps, processing mostly digital signals do not have to compensate for such a loss given the amplitude is more consistent across the bandwidth.

Also, note the difference in facial property used for the modern amp over "vintage". The older designs were chock full of switches, manipulating signal and gain, this seems to be non trending in modern audio equipment.

Sometime ago.. :blah: on an audio planet, far.. far.. away. A veteran audiologist mentored me in the following considering "pure audio" and components. He said, the greater the manipulation of the original signal to be reproduced, by said component.. the increase for "coloring" of the original signal or for that matter reproduced sound. I distinctly remember his components, which he had an extaordinary setup of individual "stuff", I can not recall to identify BUT each had or was limited to a on/off, indicator, and single button/rotary controller.

The sound.. of which he preferred classical was always.. OUTSTANDING!
 
You certainly made a point that is most notable.. :thumbsup:"Then again loudness equipped stereos are not part of my main systems".. and this is true for most newer systems that lean more towards detent controlled volume and digitally fed amplification. The "loudness" feature is non existent :no:

My :idea: theory: Analog signal power amplification needed a feature that would enhance the loss or cutoff frequencies at lower volumes of play, ergo.. the "loudness" button/toggle. Modern amps, processing mostly digital signals do not have to compensate for such a loss given the amplitude is more consistent across the bandwidth.

Also, note the difference in facial property used for the modern amp over "vintage". The older designs were chock full of switches, manipulating signal and gain, this seems to be non trending in modern audio equipment.

Sometime ago.. :blah: on an audio planet, far.. far.. away. A veteran audiologist mentored me in the following considering "pure audio" and components. He said, the greater the manipulation of the original signal to be reproduced, by said component.. the increase for "coloring" of the original signal or for that matter reproduced sound. I distinctly remember his components, which he had an extaordinary setup of individual "stuff", I can not recall to identify BUT each had or was limited to a on/off, indicator, and single button/rotary controller.

The sound.. of which he preferred classical was always.. OUTSTANDING!
Fletcher/Munson response is a physiological response, not electrical/digital.
 
Years ago I used loudness all the time. Now I think it blows. Better gear, better speakers, room treatments and room correction. It sounds gooder.....
 
Yeah same here, things sound best at mid to low volume, it's a reason I don't buy high powered gear, don't need it or want it unless somebody is giving something away. I still like distortion when using my guitar amp but it sounds fuller and more detailed to me at low volume.
 
Back
Top Bottom