Ok, I like the Monoprice premium interconnects. I've always had good luck with them and they are way better than what one can get from rat shack or the ones that come in the box with new gear.
I have also always disbelieved the hype about the uber expensive interconnects and speaker cables. I just don't see the justification for them.
That said though I am curious. I have recently had a 1 hour course in interconnect cables from a guy I met when I bought my Pioneer PL-530 and HPM100s from.
He works with cables a lot and he was showing me some and explaining them to me although I was grasping only part of it (It was a lot of info and such for an hour). He also runs them on his system which is fairly high-end to me, but it's not all that expensive. It's also separates.
Anyway, he was encouraging me to pick up one or two PBJ cables. They are the "budget line" from some uber expensive cable maker (I forget the name). Even though "budget" (I don't think $70 is very budget for one cable) they are still made just as well as the other more expensive models from this particular maker. He told me that if I hook them into where my most important interconnect would be I would notice a big difference.
Let's take money, personal preference and bragging rights out of the equation. Let's pretend I could easily afford these expensive cables. (Believe me, it's overtaxing my imagination on that one).
My question is this:
My modern system is not separates. I have an Onkyo TX-R705 with and Onkyo C390 CD player (decent dac in that thing), a Yamaha DVD player and a Sony TT linear tracking which I don't use anymore because it's cheap sounding. (It really doesn't sound all that good) I'm currently running 25 year old Kenwood towers which I got for a song back in 1985.
Now with that gear would I really notice an improvement in SQ to make it cost effective for those expensive interconnects? If so, could you explain why? Also do you think the most important interconnect is between the receiver and the CD player?
OR
Am I already as good as it gets with the monoprice stuff I run.
I have also always disbelieved the hype about the uber expensive interconnects and speaker cables. I just don't see the justification for them.
That said though I am curious. I have recently had a 1 hour course in interconnect cables from a guy I met when I bought my Pioneer PL-530 and HPM100s from.
He works with cables a lot and he was showing me some and explaining them to me although I was grasping only part of it (It was a lot of info and such for an hour). He also runs them on his system which is fairly high-end to me, but it's not all that expensive. It's also separates.
Anyway, he was encouraging me to pick up one or two PBJ cables. They are the "budget line" from some uber expensive cable maker (I forget the name). Even though "budget" (I don't think $70 is very budget for one cable) they are still made just as well as the other more expensive models from this particular maker. He told me that if I hook them into where my most important interconnect would be I would notice a big difference.
Let's take money, personal preference and bragging rights out of the equation. Let's pretend I could easily afford these expensive cables. (Believe me, it's overtaxing my imagination on that one).
My question is this:
My modern system is not separates. I have an Onkyo TX-R705 with and Onkyo C390 CD player (decent dac in that thing), a Yamaha DVD player and a Sony TT linear tracking which I don't use anymore because it's cheap sounding. (It really doesn't sound all that good) I'm currently running 25 year old Kenwood towers which I got for a song back in 1985.
Now with that gear would I really notice an improvement in SQ to make it cost effective for those expensive interconnects? If so, could you explain why? Also do you think the most important interconnect is between the receiver and the CD player?
OR
Am I already as good as it gets with the monoprice stuff I run.