Did I choose right? PLC-590 vs PL-L1 turntable

I'll keep you in mind, Theo, if I ever decide to sell it, as if I did I'd want it to go into the hands of an appreciative aficionado. That said, I'd suggest that you don't hold your breath while waiting. As I've said, if it works even half as well as it looks -- or even just barely as wel as the mid-fi stuff I've been using-- I'll still keep it, based on looks alone... and I expect it to work better than that! :D

I wouldn't say I'd NEVER sell it, because never is a long time, and lots of things can happen, but I suspect this may be a "lifetime" keeper for me. That is, one that I might keep as long as I can still enjoy the sounds of vinyl. The fact that I probably wouldn't ever find a chance to own one again (given how rare they apparently are) would also make me hesitate to sell it. It wouldn't be so easy to remedy "seller's remorse" on an item this uncommon.

Arkay,
No holding of breath here mate!
I own a PX-2.I know how good these turntables can sound. :music:
You won't be letting the PL-L1 go any time soon. :tears:
Good luck to ya. :thmbsp:
I've tweeked mine a fair bit with the Boston Audio Mat 1 carbon/graphite mat(which I rate as an essential upgrade).
The PX-2 currently sits upon a SAP Relaxa 3+ mag/lev stand,but I'm currently in correspondence with the 'Minus K' company in the US to buy one of their isolation devices($2700 US).
It's said "Put your money where your mouth is".I've been a supporter of these higher class Japanese Linear trackers for a while now(based solely upon how good they sound).Quite a few of the AKers who have consequently bought PX-2s have posted how the PX-2 supplanted the other turntables they owned as the preferred vinyl source.
I've invested (literally) thousands of dollars into the corollary equipment I use with the PX-2 because it is evident with all the better equipment,that the PX-2 still has more tricks up it's sleeve,and the better cartridge,phono stages are revealing yet more of what the PX-2 is able to retrieve from the groove.
I'm hoping that the Minus K will enable more still to be gleaned from this under-estimated deck.
I don't think you will want to let go of the PL-L1,and I think it will have more to do with how it sounds,as opposed to it's 'rarity' value.
Keep us up to date with your ongoing assessment of these two gems. :thmbsp:
 
Arkay,
No holding of breath here mate!
I own a PX-2.I know how good these turntables can sound. :music:
You won't be letting the PL-L1 go any time soon. :tears:
Good luck to ya. :thmbsp:
I've tweeked mine a fair bit with the Boston Audio Mat 1 carbon/graphite mat(which I rate as an essential upgrade).
The PX-2 currently sits upon a SAP Relaxa 3+ mag/lev stand,but I'm currently in correspondence with the 'Minus K' company in the US to buy one of their isolation devices($2700 US).
It's said "Put your money where your mouth is".I've been a supporter of these higher class Japanese Linear trackers for a while now(based solely upon how good they sound).Quite a few of the AKers who have consequently bought PX-2s have posted how the PX-2 supplanted the other turntables they owned as the preferred vinyl source.
I've invested (literally) thousands of dollars into the corollary equipment I use with the PX-2 because it is evident with all the better equipment,that the PX-2 still has more tricks up it's sleeve,and the better cartridge,phono stages are revealing yet more of what the PX-2 is able to retrieve from the groove.
I'm hoping that the Minus K will enable more still to be gleaned from this under-estimated deck.
I don't think you will want to let go of the PL-L1,and I think it will have more to do with how it sounds,as opposed to it's 'rarity' value.
Keep us up to date with your ongoing assessment of these two gems. :thmbsp:

I'm very happy to read your comments. Up to now (since I won't get it until this weekend) I have yet to hear what one of these beasts sounds like. That's why all I can talk about is the appearance, the rarity and my hopes. I'm hoping and betting (with the purchase money) that it will be really nice sonically, too. If what you say is true, then yes, this will be a "permanent" keeper.

Ironically, today I had an hour free, so I went to an audio shop that I know has a bunch of old Japanese audiophile mags, to see if I could find anything about the PL-L1. No luck yet on that front --they had too many mags for me to get through them all in one sitting-- but they DID have a number of new (vintage) turntables for sale there. For the first time, I saw not one but TWO old Technics direct drive tables: SP-15 and SH-1583. They looked virtually identical, except the plinths were different. The shop also had a Denon DP-3000, a Micro Seiki DDX-1000, and a few others. No linear trackers, but a lot of direct drive eye candy. I've never seen so many high-end direct-drive TTs in one week before. There were a few others (Thorens 125 MkII with SME 3009 - identical to the arm I'm getting on the PL-C590), but what hit me was the sudden wealth of Japanese DD tables. They were all in about the same price range as I'm paying for the PL-L1, but I think (hope) I'm getting a better deal. At least I'm getting a bit more engineering, more machinery and more weight! LOL

Theophile, after I get my PL-L1 home and have had a chance to clean it up and listen to it as-is for a while, I'll be interested in what tweaks make sense for it. I'm probably not ready to plunk down $2700 for an isolation table (and if I should, please don't tell my wife! LOL), but I'm definitely looking forward to hearing this table, and experimenting with things like isolation methods to get the most I can out of it. When the time comes, I hope you won't mind if I PM you for some advice. Being a complete newbie to this kind of deck, and recognizing that it is a fundamentally different technology, I may benefit from your experience and knowledge. As any audio nut would, of course, I would like to get the most I can out of this interesting new (to me) component.
 
I'm very happy to read your comments. Up to now (since I won't get it until this weekend) I have yet to hear what one of these beasts sounds like. That's why all I can talk about is the appearance, the rarity and my hopes. I'm hoping and betting (with the purchase money) that it will be really nice sonically, too. If what you say is true, then yes, this will be a "permanent" keeper.

Ironically, today I had an hour free, so I went to an audio shop that I know has a bunch of old Japanese audiophile mags, to see if I could find anything about the PL-L1. No luck yet on that front --they had too many mags for me to get through them all in one sitting-- but they DID have a number of new (vintage) turntables for sale there. For the first time, I saw not one but TWO old Technics direct drive tables: SP-15 and SH-1583. They looked virtually identical, except the plinths were different. The shop also had a Denon DP-3000, a Micro Seiki DDX-1000, and a few others. No linear trackers, but a lot of direct drive eye candy. I've never seen so many high-end direct-drive TTs in one week before. There were a few others (Thorens 125 MkII with SME 3009 - identical to the arm I'm getting on the PL-C590), but what hit me was the sudden wealth of Japanese DD tables. They were all in about the same price range as I'm paying for the PL-L1, but I think (hope) I'm getting a better deal. At least I'm getting a bit more engineering, more machinery and more weight! LOL

Theophile, after I get my PL-L1 home and have had a chance to clean it up and listen to it as-is for a while, I'll be interested in what tweaks make sense for it. I'm probably not ready to plunk down $2700 for an isolation table (and if I should, please don't tell my wife! LOL), but I'm definitely looking forward to hearing this table, and experimenting with things like isolation methods to get the most I can out of it. When the time comes, I hope you won't mind if I PM you for some advice. Being a complete newbie to this kind of deck, and recognizing that it is a fundamentally different technology, I may benefit from your experience and knowledge. As any audio nut would, of course, I would like to get the most I can out of this interesting new (to me) component.

Arkay,
I usually suggest that folks should listen to the stock unit(ie get familiar with it's stock sound),before undertaking any tweeking.The sound of 'stock' providing the 'control' for the tweeking experiment.
Live with it for a few months,optimising the tracking force,overhang etc.
I picked-up my old copy of Telarc Omnidisc the last time I was in Sydney.The Omnidisc has a side which has a tangential groove,to facilitate the correct overhang for linear trackers.Keep your eyes out for one. :yes:
Feel free to PM me.
 
Arkay,
I usually suggest that folks should listen to the stock unit(ie get familiar with it's stock sound),before undertaking any tweeking.The sound of 'stock' providing the 'control' for the tweeking experiment.. Live with it for a few months,optimising the tracking force,overhang etc.

Thanks for the good advice. I completely agree, and will do that. I think it will take me some time just to get all the adjustments made correctly, anyway, as I've never had a good LT before, and am thus inexperienced in setting them up properly. Then I'll need time to get accustomed to (i.e., "learn") the sound, as you say, so that I'll be able to judge fairly whether or not any changes are really improvements.

I picked-up my old copy of Telarc Omnidisc the last time I was in Sydney.The Omnidisc has a side which has a tangential groove,to facilitate the correct overhang for linear trackers.Keep your eyes out for one. :yes:
Feel free to PM me.


Thanks a lot for that tip. I'll keep an eye out for that disk, and ask my local LP dealers to keep an eye out for it, too. Eventually, I'll find one and use it.
 
Done deal - I'm getting BOTH turntables!

FIRST, THE PL-L1:

Tonight I met up with the guy I'm getting the PL-L1 from, and paid for it in full. It's all mine, and I'll bring it home on Monday or Tuesday. :banana: The seller closed down his retail shop several months ago, and is only dealing from his warehouse these days. The warehouse is way out in another (more remote) district, so we met up midway at a restaurant and concluded the deal over a meal and conversation.

He confirmed that all the motors and such are working correctly on it, but said that I will have to make the usual adjustments on it for tracking force, etc... He mentioned that I'd probably need to open up the bottom and adjust the servo. [Not repair it, just fine-adjust it for the correct speed.] That's fine, although never having done these on this kind of TT, and I'll have to learn how! LOL

We had an interesting conversation. He has been in the business for a few decades, and is extremely knowledgeable about audio stuff. He also has very definite, fixed ideas about what is good and what is not. He is obviously a confirmed supporter of BIG speakers with HORNS. According to him, my Infinities just won't cut it. Have to have big speakers with horns! [He admitted, though, that few people in Hong Kong had living rooms large enough for such speakers.] He said that my 3650 pre-amps are not good enough, but said I should use the Esotec SC-6 instead; it sounds better than the 3650, in his opinion. :scratch2: I'm not sure that I agree, but presumably it does on the big systems with horns that he prefers.

He also said that one should ALWAYS replace All caps in an older amp --100% of them-- because even when the caps measure out okay on an ESR meter, caps still change sonically for the worse over time. Old caps just won't cut it. He said to recap one section at a time, and listen between doing each section, to hear the differences. Ironically, that is exactly what I have been doing, but mostly because I don't have an ESR meter, and don't trust my work well enough not to check it after each board! :D

He emphasized at one point that I was getting a really good deal (low price) on the PL-L1. He said on the day I first saw and bought it, a mainland buyer had actually been willing to pay more, but he didn't like the way the mainlander was "negotiating", nit-picking about little scratches and such, so he decided to sell it for less to me, instead. If he still had his shop, the price in the shop would have been double what I'm paying. I think I believe him, as I always felt his prices were a little on the high side, but the price on this seems very reasonable to me. I did tell him that I'd seen one on offer from a high-end shop in Japan, for well over a thousand dollars, but we agreed that Japan is a different market from Hong Kong, with different pricing.

Now if anyone knows of good resources/info on how to set up/adjust this linear tracker, or knows where I can get the user manual and/or service manual for it, I'd really appreciate it. I may try one of those services that helps people buy stuff from Japan (and will even translate it), for the service manual.


THE PL-C590:

I also met up with the guy with the PL-C590. He had already been holding it for me, but I paid him a deposit of $125 to secure it, and he gladly agreed to keep holding it for me for a while, no rush. I'll get it in a couple of weeks, when I get my next installment of "audio cash". [I allocate a certain segment of my income for audio, and try not to spend more than that each month.] So I'm definitely getting BOTH of these TTs! :banana: [Please forgive my bananas, but I'm very pleased with these.:D ]

He told me that the man who brought in the turntable and sold it to him was an elderly man, around 70 years old. The old man lived in his own house and had originally used it with some very large B&O speakers and a good amp (don't know what one), The man had sold the amp and speakers quite a while ago, but kept the turntable, because he loved it so much he just couldn't bring himself to part with it.

But finally the man realized that it wasn't any use keeping the turntable just to have it sit there without any amp and speakers to use it with, so he very reluctantly decided to part with it. He just felt "too old to get back into it". The old man said he had always kept the turntable completely covered with a thick cloth whenever it wasn't in use, to protect it. I believe that, because the thing looks virtually new, as if it was unpacked a few weeks or months ago, not years ago. The one or two tiny scratches on the dust cover my friend (the dealer) admitted were put there by him, when he first moved it into the warehouse and was moving gear around. :sigh: After that, he put it up high on top of a stable stack (where it is now), so that no further scratching would occur. he also put some newspaper on top of it, to help protect it. I asked him to PLEASE continue to keep it completely untouched and undamaged, until I pick it up, saying it would be a shame for something that old that had survived so well, to be damaged after all these years. He agreed. I said I would continue to keep it covered after I got it, and protect it like the old man had done,, which I will do. :yes: In fact, I think I'll eventually design/make a nice custom cover for it, maybe with the Pioneer logo or something like that.

The old man had also emphasized to my friend (the wholesale dealer I'm getting it from) that he must NOT sell the turntable cheaply. It had cost him a LOT of money when he had first bought it (over a thousand US$),, and was WORTH A LOT, or so the old man was at great pains to emphasize. His "instruction" was to sell it for AT LEAST $650 at an absolute minimum. I'm paying substantially less for it, of course. :D I don't know how much my friend (the dealer) paid the old man for it, but don't worry, he's still making a profit. We both know it could fetch more in an upmarket shop downtown, but that is the nature of the business. Guess I'm buying in the "right" locations for relative bargains.

So I'm getting both of these Pioneer turntables, for certain. I'm very pleased about it, needless to say. I will now FINALLY sell off the bunch of mid-fi and lesser TTs I have around. Funny how psychology works: I thought about doing that for a long time, to free up room (and funds) for something better, but kept putting it off. Now that I actually HAVE got something better,it is very easy for me to let go of the others. It will feel good to reduce some of the lesser audio 'clutter' and make a few bucks, too.

It's a little surprising to me that things turned out this way, in that when I previously thought about what turntable(s) I'd really LIKE to find, Pioneer did not really come to mind. I thought of maybe a Thorens or a nice Micro Seiki, or perhaps a Linn, but Pioneer? :no: :thumbsdn: I just didn't associate the brand with really good TTs, and I didn't realize how nice these models were, until I saw them "in the flesh". Now I'm perfectly contented to become a "Pioneer TT guy", instead. :yes:

And yes, I know you all want/need PICS. Please be patient, as I haven't even brought the TTs home yet! But they are among the first things I will (eventually) photograph and post on AK, just because I think they are so 'pretty'. :yes: :D

Thanks to all for your comments/advice so far. Y'all helped me make up my mind to get both of these (although I knew I wanted both, all along), and I'm grateful for that. :yes: :thmbsp:
 
You have more Pioneer to go. One of their better Reel machines should be sitting in that future custom cabinet. One source of Pioneer analog is not enough. I would never say that a Pioneer tape deck was the be-all, end-all - but they are very nice and I love my RT901. There are better. Just keep your eyes open.

Pioneer is odd for me. Some of their stuff is killer good and some is pretty mediocre. I think it all depends on the design team and the price/market point they were trying to reach. There is no argument that they knew/know audio and electronics.

They are one of dozen best out of Japan from the hay day of vintage gear. You dun real good young man :)
 
Arkay,
The wholesaler who is selling the PL-L1 is being somewhat economical with the truth(by my own reckoning).
I'm certain that as part of the user adjustable functions on the PL-L1,taking the bottom off the unit(in order to adjust the speed)wasn't one of the factory sanctioned steps.
This man is 'knowledgeable' about things 'Hi-Fi',but he doesn't see anything out of the ordinary about an 'adjustment' which requires partially dismantling the TT.
It sounds to me as if he already knows that it doesn't run at the correct speed. :scratch2:
Just my suspicious mind. :smoke:
 
You have more Pioneer to go. One of their better Reel machines should be sitting in that future custom cabinet. One source of Pioneer analog is not enough. I would never say that a Pioneer tape deck was the be-all, end-all - but they are very nice and I love my RT901. There are better. Just keep your eyes open.

I wouldn't turn down a good Pioneer R2R, by any means, but my heart is really set on a Revox B77, or at least top-class studio deck of that caliber. I thought I had one once, but due to some mis-communication, it slipped through my fingers. :tears: I have several mid-level R2Rs, and won't buy another unless it is a real "spitzenklasse" upgrade. In fact, just as with the turntables, I want to get rid of what I have and keep just one or to of the best.

Pioneer is odd for me. Some of their stuff is killer good and some is pretty mediocre. I think it all depends on the design team and the price/market point they were trying to reach. There is no argument that they knew/know audio and electronics.

In complete agreement. :yes:

They are one of dozen best out of Japan from the hay day of vintage gear. You dun real good young man :)

Double thanks. First, for confirming that I got something good this time, and secondly for calling me a young man. :thmbsp: It's been a few years since anyone called me that! [Okay, I know you are referring to the older dealer and I note the smiley, but let me enjoy it, anyway... :D ]

Arkay,
The wholesaler who is selling the PL-L1 is being somewhat economical with the truth(by my own reckoning).
I'm certain that as part of the user adjustable functions on the PL-L1,taking the bottom off the unit(in order to adjust the speed)wasn't one of the factory sanctioned steps.
This man is 'knowledgeable' about things 'Hi-Fi',but he doesn't see anything out of the ordinary about an 'adjustment' which requires partially dismantling the TT.
It sounds to me as if he already knows that it doesn't run at the correct speed. :scratch2:
Just my suspicious mind. :smoke:

You may well be partly right, but I think he was at least trying to be honest. I wasn't a walk-in retail customer; we've known each other a while, and he knows I also buy from the wholesale end of the market (where nothing is tested, even, and repairs are expected) and usually do my own restoration work. He was straightforward about what worked correctly (e.g., platter speed is correct and stable, bearings are okay) and what needs work (linear tracking controller needs adjustment, and tone arm settings of course will need adjustment), which is more information than I usually get when I buy gear. Just to clarify: the linear arm on this is motorized with servo controllers; it is in this area that adjustment is needed. I was a little concerned about that area, as I have limited (only theoretical,from looking at drawings and examining a similar one a while back) knowledge and no experience at all with this particular motor system, but he said it was an easy adjustment from underneath. I think he'll show me/help me out if I get stuck. I could pay him extra to just fix it up for me, but I'd rather buy it as-is and do it myself, for the experience. He's being helpful telling/showing me the details of what needs to be done, and when I asked him, he suggested where I could try to locate the owner's and service manuals, and have them translated. It is understood on both sides what I'm buying and what I'm not, and the price also reflects this fairly. If I run into any surprises, it will more likely be due to my misunderstanding of some technical Cantonese terminology than his being deliberately deceptive.

I won't be disappointed if it needs a little work; I expect to re-furbish anything this old, anyway, and I do want to gain a fairly intimate understanding of how this thing was engineered. I want to make it like new, if possible by myself, and would only fear a unit that was unrepairable due to unobtanium, etc... I'm assured that this isn't remotely in that bracket. He says it needs no repairs, just routine adjustments. That may well be repairman's routine adjustments; not an average Joe Retail-buyer's adjustments, which is fine with me. I had three years of pre-engineering studies in college, and am comfortable with much (although not all) that is electro-mechanical. I'd take the bottom off to study the "guts", even if it worked perfectly! If the thing actually turns out to be hopeless, I can probably still get my money back, but that shouldn't be the case.

I will test this thing out pretty quickly, but I don't plan to put it into regular service anyway until I've re-done my entire main system's racks and built a platform for it. I want to get the owner's manual and the service manual, too.

If, when I get into going over it, there is anything it needs that I'm not confident enough to handle myself, I'll find the right person to do it. All this could take from a couple weeks to a couple months,but I figure this baby deserves the best treatment I can give it, and I'll be patient. I have the rest of my life to enjoy it (should I choose to), after all.

One thing I bitterly regret now. Just earlier this year (several weeks back) I saw actually saw one of those Minus K laboratory-grade vibration isolation platforms at the scrap-metal recycling place. I looked at it for about ten minutes, examining what I could see of its internal mechanisms. playing around with putting one hand on the platform and rapping the side of the case to "feel-test" the absorption, and thinking hard about whether I should get it.

I actually wanted it, but I couldn't see a practical enough use for it. It was a bit too small and a bit too tall for most audio gear to sit atop without turning it into an awkward pedestal under a mushroom cap, and I knew it would be overkill for the gear I had at that time. I didn't know that I would be getting this grade of turntable so quickly, to sort-of justify having it. I'm trying to "declutter" some of the piles of miscellaneous gear I've accumulated, so I passed up on it.

NOW (with 20/20 hindisight) I know I would have had a good use for it, and I've thought of a great way to solve the "mushroom" issue, using modifications to a smallish Solid Steel rack I found. Perhaps the worst thing is knowing that I could have paid around ten bucks for it, when they sell new for US$2700 and up, a price I don't think I'll ever pay just to squeeze out that last percent (or two) of vibration. There was also a large argon laser there i wanted, but it had been damaged including breakage of the glass tube, so it was easy to walk away from that. Don't see things like that very often; some lab must have closed down, but I can always hope that there might be another. From here out I'll have my eyes peeled for any more vibration-isolation tables! :yes:
 
If I win the lottery, could I send you a bunch of money and let you go shopping for me?:D

Absolutely! I'd love to go shopping with your money and get myself lots of stuff I want. :D [ JUST JOKING, of course.] If you win the lottery come on over and we can go shopping together, or send the money and I'll get you some good stuff. 'twould be fun, either way! :yes:


Congratulations on both the TTs. I think you wil be very pleased with them.

Thanks, onepixel. I think so, too! :yes: :D
 
Arkay,
I hope you see that I wasn't trying to make your good fortune taste sour. :no:
From what you just said,it's obvious that your connection is an honourable person,and a straight shooter. :yes:

That's freaky(what you said about seeing a Minus K at the scrap metal dealers).
I realise that the 'K's are expensive,but I'm committed to a long term analogue future with my system(Thank GOD for the vinyl revival).The Minus K will be useful under both my present turntable,and any future ones I may purchase.
I'm actually(in the distant future)considering a Grand Prix Monaco direct drive with a linear tracking arm.
Even if I change around my amps and speakers(from what I've got at the moment),I'd like to have the vinyl front-end component to be as good as I can afford.Strangely enough,it's the amazing sound quality of my PX-2 which has set me on this course.I like what I hear from superior vinyl front-ends,and I want more of it. :yes:
Arkay,I remember saying to you last year that,given your exposure to the very high quality gear that pops-up in HK,you should aim for the best sounding gear in order to pare down the growing number of items which were stacking-up at chez Arkay.
Well I still believe that it's a good strategy,and I still believe that (with your connections and all)you are in a unique position to assemble a vintage super system just by holding-out for the premium pieces.
They are out there(moreso in HK).
Go get 'em. :D
 
So, Arkay, did you bring them home yet? What's the verdict?

Just not to leave your question un-answered, YES, I got BOTH of them

The PL-L!:

Fiirst physical impressions: This is perhaps the most over-engineered and solid brand-name turntable I've ever seen. Its solidity and all-round heavy over-engineering makes its successor, the PL-L1000 (which I have also seen and examined, but not owned) look almost toy-like by comparison... and that is really saying something, as the PL-L1000 is a very fine TT by most standards. The only plastic on the PL-L1 is the dust cover, which perhaps illustrates what I mean.

No verdict yet on the PL-L1 sonically, as I am only gradually getting it back into top-notch condition. I'm doing this extremely conservatively, as I do not want to take even a very slight risk of damaging this XXX-rare, somewhat complex and somewhat exotic beast.

Specifically, it needs:
(1) One new foot: three feet are good, and one is damaged. I think these feet are unique to this model, so I need to find sources from which I can have an exact replica created. I have that end propped up for now, but won't use it until I can get a replacement for the foot, as similar as possible to the others.

(2) There is a crack in the back corner of the dust cover. Not very noticeable from the front, but there. I'm trying to find an old post wherein a plastics expert used some kind of specialist solvent (instead of a glue) to make a crack virtually "disappear". Until then, the crack makes no discernible
effect on anything, so I'll live with it. If I cannot make it "disappear", maye eventually I'll have the dust cover duplicated, instead.

(3) The platter drive is stable, dead quiet and spot-on accurate. no need to do anything there.

(4) The linear-tracking tone arm, when activated, moves over to the starting position, and then does an even, rhythmic sort of left-right dance, as if hunting for the correct starting point. This is what the seller was referring to, that must be corrected/adjusted "underneath" (where the controlling circuits are). I'm still researching how to do this properly, trying to source the original service manual, lest I step wrongly and screw things up. That's why I have no sonic report yet.

With other gear, I'd plunge in and figure things out as I went along, but I'm just not taking any chances with this particular TT. I don't really mind the wait, as I don't plan to put it into regular use before I've fully re-done my main system with new racks and such, anyway, so there will be a place to put this that will do it justice. To that end, I've also started working on a "base" for it to sit on, too (at least until I stumble on another Minus-K table). Not needed, but why not display one's "pride and joy" a little more nicely?!

(5). I've cleaned and shined the plinth. It looks very, very nice!


The PL-C590:
I finally brought this one home, and it is, simply put, the best turntable I've ever owned. Since nothing I've had sounded as good, and the (possibly) better ones I've heard were through different gear in different settings, I really have little to say except I LIKE THIS TURNTABLE! Beautiful to look at, beautiful to hear! :music:

Right now, it has the SME 3009 II tonearm on it that came with it, and I plan to leave it that way, at least until such day as I can get an original Pioneer arm for it, and it is still with the mid-range Shure cart that came on it. I will eventually be putting the V15 III on it later, though, which should improve things further. I have a lot of audio-related projects on hand now, and to be honest my first priority these days is selling off some of the accumulated gear I have "cluttering up" every available storage spot. When I have sold off the other turntables and some other stuff and improved the racks in my living room, THEN I'll tackle more tweaking on things like these turntables.

I'll be bringing home a copy of the Telarc Omnidisc in a week or so, and will use it to re-check and tweak or dial in the tonearm and cartridge alingments and settings on the turntables. I did the best I could with what I have (a stylus-force gauge, both a bubble spirit level and a laser-leveler, and a printed-out alignment grid I downloaded), but I'm sure things could be improved a little, and I'm hoping (and believe) the Omnidisc will help me to do it better.

Eventually (maybe in a few months) when the new racks are in, and all this is set up and fully tweaked to my satisfaction, I'll post again with pics and more substantive reviews/comments on these tables --hopefully even with pics! :D
 
Back
Top Bottom