JBLs with 10" Woofers L26, L50, L110

clang444

Active Member
So fortune (and a lot of junk shop and estate sale visits) has brought into my possession 3 pairs of vintage JBL speakers with 10" woofers:
L26 Decade, L50, L110.

All are in very good+ condition and have been re-foamed and re-capped by me. From what I can gather, all 3 of these speakers were available for sale in the late 1970s - early 1980s, so if you walked into a store in '78 or '79, you could have purchased any one of these speakers. What really surprised me when putting them next to each other is that the dimensions are different for each speaker, so it looks like JBL started from scratch with each design with no consideration for production streamlining/simplification.

How do they sound? I am not a super critical listener, but I've always been a 3-way speaker fan. A tweeter, midrange and big woofer just seems right to me. My gold standard speakers are JBL 4312A Control Monitors. They were my first "real" speakers and I bought a pair new when I was in the Army in West Germany in the '80s. I've owned and listened to many speakers since then, but the 4312As are still my favorites. I was dumb enough to sell my original pair many years ago, but I have since bought and reconditioned another pair. I also prefer solid state amps and used an old Technics SU-V707 90 watt/channel integrated amp when comparing these speakers. That being said:

L110 - very close in all ways to the 4312As. Base may be a little tighter but maybe I'm jaded knowing the woofer is smaller. Great speaker. Like the 4312As, they tend to be unforgiving of poor recording quality, but that's to be expected from an accurate speaker.

L50 - pretty darn close to the L110s, but the highs are not quite the same. Not worse, just different, maybe a little warmer. I assume its because the L110 has a dome tweeter vs the cone tweeter in the L50s. My hearing doesn't go up past ~14kHz any more, so maybe a younger ear would see more of a difference. Speaker grills make a difference. You want to turn the tweeters down a notch or two if you listen without the grills.

L26 - listening to these is like listening to the L50s with the bass and treble knobs turned up a notch on the amp. Not a bad thing, especially at lower volume. I miss the midrange driver visually, but the sound does not suffer badly.

Some other notes:
All 3 sets of speakers are a pleasure to listen to. When spaced properly, they put you "in" to the music. I couldn't do blind testing because I'm alone, but maybe I'll get to it in the future.

I didn't do a direct comparison, but I believe the L50 and L110 crossovers are of similar design to the 4312As. The L26 crossover was very simple, there was only 1 cap to replace.

The L26 and L50 speakers are rated 35 watts/channel RMS while the L110s are 75 watts/channel RMS
 

Attachments

  • 20260122_180348.jpg
    20260122_180348.jpg
    129.4 KB · Views: 35
  • 20260122_180403.jpg
    20260122_180403.jpg
    110.2 KB · Views: 32
  • 20260122_180409.jpg
    20260122_180409.jpg
    105.9 KB · Views: 28
  • 20260122_180510.jpg
    20260122_180510.jpg
    112.8 KB · Views: 32
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
So fortune (and a lot of junk shop and estate sale visits) has brought into my possession 3 pairs of vintage JBL speakers with 10" woofers:
L26 Decade, L50, L110.

All are in very good+ condition and have been re-foamed and re-capped by me. From what I can gather, all 3 of these speakers were available for sale in the late 1970s - early 1980s, so if you walked into a store in '78 or '79, you could have purchased any one of these speakers. What really surprised me when putting them next to each other is that the dimensions are different for each speaker, so it looks like JBL started from scratch with each design with no consideration for production streamlining/simplification.

How do they sound? I am not a super critical listener, but I've always been a 3-way speaker fan. A tweeter, midrange and big woofer just seems right to me. My gold standard speakers are JBL 4312A Control Monitors. They were my first "real" speakers and I bought a pair new when I was in the Army in West Germany in the '80s. I've owned and listened to many speakers since then, but the 4312As are still my favorites. I was dumb enough to sell my original pair many years ago, but I have since bought and reconditioned another pair. I also prefer solid state amps and used an old Technics SU-V707 90 watt/channel integrated amp when comparing these speakers. That being said:

L110 - very close in all ways to the 4312As. Base may be a little tighter but maybe I'm jaded knowing the woofer is smaller. Great speaker. Like the 4312As, they tend to be unforgiving of poor recording quality, but that's to be expected from an accurate speaker.

L50 - pretty darn close to the L110s, but the highs are not quite the same. Not worse, just different, maybe a little warmer. I assume its because the L110 has a dome tweeter vs the cone tweeter in the L50s. My hearing doesn't go up past ~14kHz any more, so maybe a younger ear would see more of a difference. Speaker grills make a difference. You want to turn the tweeters down a notch or two if you listen without the grills.

L26 - listening to these is like listening to the L50s with the bass and treble knobs turned up a notch on the amp. Not a bad thing, especially at lower volume. I miss the midrange driver visually, but the sound does not suffer badly.

Some other notes:
All 3 sets of speakers are a pleasure to listen to. When spaced properly, they put you "in" to the music. I couldn't do blind testing because I'm alone, but maybe I'll get to it in the future.

I didn't do a direct comparison, but I believe the L50 and L110 crossovers are of similar design to the 4312As. The L26 crossover was very simple, there was only 1 cap to replace.

The L26 and L50 speakers are rated 35 watts/channel RMS while the L110s are 75 watts/channel RMS

I’ve had every one of those speakers, the L26 will do best 6-8” off the ground and 6-8 feet apart towed in slightly.

The L-50s are JBL budget attempt; they sound similar to the L-36 but the 26s sound better.

The L-110 is considered to be a bookshelf and lacks low frequency, it’s actually a mid bass driver designed for mid range you need a sub or another set that will produce lower frequencies to have them achieve proper sound stage.

Cool stuff!!

Sell all of them and purchase a set of L-16s they all best all of them in SQ :)
 
jobrewer1983 said:
"Sell all of them and purchase a set of L-16s they all best all of them in SQ :)"

Interesting. I had a set of L-16s and they did not impress me at the time. Maybe I wasn't using expensive enough speaker wire...
 
Last edited:
Those are nice- but IMHO, the L96 (especially if modded with the 4313B crossover- which is pretty simple to do) is the best of that era JBL 10"-based home audio speakers. And better than the L16 or L19.

If you go a bit newer- the L80T is better than even that, at least to my ears.

Regards,
Gordon.
 
Nice story and great collection of some JBL legacy speakers. Not to be overlooked watch for their model L80 or L80T3 the latter of the models was the better of the two. It is another 10” 3 way speaker from them just a little newer
 
L-16 Decade?

Yep

IMG_5359.jpeg

Decade 16s

I’ve got a few sets of them, the L-19’s 4301b as well. 4401 as well. L-16s are the best small JBLs. The bottom end is ran open in the crossover, gives them great midrange and they do not lack bottom end. The LE25 pairs well with the 116s.

IMG_5332.jpeg

Some cool inductors I’m using in a set right now IMG_5335.jpeg

I’ve refoamed a good 40-50 116A/H drivers :)

IMG_4859.jpeg

IMG_4913.jpeg

Another L-16 crossover ^^
 
Those are nice- but IMHO, the L96 (especially if modded with the 4313B crossover- which is pretty simple to do) is the best of that era JBL 10"-based home audio speakers. And better than the L16 or L19.

If you go a bit newer- the L80T is better than even that, at least to my ears.

Regards,
Gordon.
I agree! L80T3 are excellent and dig even deeper with GordonW modifications :)
 
jobrewer1983 said:

"The L-110 is considered to be a bookshelf and lacks low frequency, it’s actually a mid bass driver designed for mid range you need a sub or another set that will produce lower frequencies to have them achieve proper sound stage."

"L-16s are the best small JBLs. The bottom end is ran open in the crossover, gives them great midrange and they do not lack bottom end. The LE25 pairs well with the 116s."

So you are saying the 2-way L16's with 8" 116A woofers have good bass, but the 3-way L110's with 10" LE111As are actually mid bass drivers and the speakers are lacking in bottom end? I didn't realize the 111A woofers were so poorly regarded.
 
I had the L-50s back in the day. I'd give them a rating of.. meh. They were the secondaries to my 4311B mains. The L-50s were weak compared to the 4311s.
 
jobrewer1983 said:

"The L-110 is considered to be a bookshelf and lacks low frequency, it’s actually a mid bass driver designed for mid range you need a sub or another set that will produce lower frequencies to have them achieve proper sound stage."

"L-16s are the best small JBLs. The bottom end is ran open in the crossover, gives them great midrange and they do not lack bottom end. The LE25 pairs well with the 116s."

So you are saying the 2-way L16's with 8" 116A woofers have good bass, but the 3-way L110's with 10" LE111As are actually mid bass drivers and the speakers are lacking in bottom end? I didn't realize the 111A woofers were so poorly regarded.
The L110 are very good sounding speakers. I have a pair in my main listening room which is about 12' x 12'. I've had about a half-dozen others in there but the L110's sound the best.

I haven't heard the 4313B @GordonW refers to but I'm guessing the L110 are similar.
 
jobrewer1983 said:

"The L-110 is considered to be a bookshelf and lacks low frequency, it’s actually a mid bass driver designed for mid range you need a sub or another set that will produce lower frequencies to have them achieve proper sound stage."

"L-16s are the best small JBLs. The bottom end is ran open in the crossover, gives them great midrange and they do not lack bottom end. The LE25 pairs well with the 116s."

So you are saying the 2-way L16's with 8" 116A woofers have good bass, but the 3-way L110's with 10" LE111As are actually mid bass drivers and the speakers are lacking in bottom end? I didn't realize the 111A woofers were so poorly regarded.

Yes that is correct but they are not poorly regarded at all, it’s just that most folks don’t realize the 110s were bookshelves intended to be ran with a sub or other speakers. On their own they will lack some low frequency as they are not able to produce it. I still used them as stand alone speakers and they did fine.

If you really want to get into it you can research the 2 different types of crossovers JBL used on the 110 and 110A.

The 110A are my favorite over all shape of speakers for JBL I love the size and shape a lot, i wish they were standalone speakers.

Also if you hit the quote button it will actually quote me.
 
Yes that is correct but they are not poorly regarded at all, it’s just that most folks don’t realize the 110s were bookshelves intended to be ran with a sub or other speakers. On their own they will lack some low frequency as they are not able to produce it. I still used them as stand alone speakers and they did fine.


The L110 frequency response is 45Hz-20kHz, so maybe a Blue Whale would call that lacking in Bass. Back in the '70s, sub-woofers were not even a common thing. If you wanted lower bass, the answer was you used bigger woofers in a bigger cabinet.

JBL did have the L212 system in the '70s that came with 2 satellite speakers and an "ultrabass loudspeaker " unit. The satellite speakers were 3-ways with 8" "low frequency loudspeakers" like in the L16s. They needed a boost from the 12" woofer in the ultra bass cabinet which crossovered at 70 Hz and would go down to 28Hz. The woofer was powered by a 70 watt amp. The system weighed over 200 lb and cost about $2,400, which was more than half the price of a new car back then. Out of reach for most people.
 
So the L16's (8" 2-way) in a 20 ft. x 35 ft. room doesn't need a sub-woofer but the L110 (10" 3-way) does need a sub-woofer?.....:idea:

That’s what I was always told, and if you actually take a little time and do some actual research one would find that the LF drivers on the 110s are labeled by JBL as “mid-bass”. You can also probably find it in the JBL history book, yes it’s a real book.
 
The L110 frequency response is 45Hz-20kHz, so maybe a Blue Whale would call that lacking in Bass. Back in the '70s, sub-woofers were not even a common thing. If you wanted lower bass, the answer was you used bigger woofers in a bigger cabinet.

JBL did have the L212 system in the '70s that came with 2 satellite speakers and an "ultrabass loudspeaker " unit. The satellite speakers were 3-ways with 8" "low frequency loudspeakers" like in the L16s. They needed a boost from the 12" woofer in the ultra bass cabinet which crossovered at 70 Hz and would go down to 28Hz. The woofer was powered by a 70 watt amp. The system weighed over 200 lb and cost about $2,400, which was more than half the price of a new car back then. Out of reach for most people.

your incorrect the frequency response of the 110s are 35 Hz – 27,000 Hz.
 
Back
Top Bottom